某三级医院抗菌活性研究。2000-2005年期间的演变

Q4 Medicine Gaceta Medica de Bilbao Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gmb.2011.02.001
A. Alberte Castiñeiras , Ángel San Miguel Hernández , M.J. Rodríguez Barbero , C. Alberte Pérez , P. Pérez Pascual
{"title":"某三级医院抗菌活性研究。2000-2005年期间的演变","authors":"A. Alberte Castiñeiras ,&nbsp;Ángel San Miguel Hernández ,&nbsp;M.J. Rodríguez Barbero ,&nbsp;C. Alberte Pérez ,&nbsp;P. Pérez Pascual","doi":"10.1016/j.gmb.2011.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Knowledge of the antibiotic resistance in a specific healthcare area is essential for suitable application of the antibiotic policy, which can be understood as the use of recommendations for the application and consumption of antimicrobial agents, as well as for education and continual surveillance to achieve the most effective, rational and least expensive antibiotic therapy possible.</p><p>We performed a study of antimicrobial susceptibility between 2000 and 2005 in the Health Area of the West of Valladolid (Spain) corresponding to the Rio Hortega University Hospital, with a catchment area of approximately 235,0000 inhabitants.</p><p>The microorganisms tested were obtained from isolates of distinct samples from patients with infectious processes. The agents were considered causal. The most frequently isolated agents were described.</p><p>The antibiotics tested were those that showed acceptable <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> activity against each isolated species. The criteria considered were clinical effectiveness, the prevalence of resistance, a low possibility of developing resistance, indications for clinical use and being the first treatment choice or alternative. The results were expressed in percentages of susceptibility or sensitivity to the antibiotics analyzed.</p><p>The sensitivity criteria of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (USA) were followed. The category of SENSITIVE to a given antibiotic implies that the infection caused by the isolated bacterium can suitably be treated with the routine dosage of this antibiotic. The RESISTANT category implies that isolated bacteria are not inhibited with the routine dosage of this antibiotic.</p><p>The antibiotic types studied followed general lines and the following agents were taken as representative of their class: Ampicillin (ampicillin and amoxicillin derivatives), Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid(ampicillin/sulbactam), Cefalotin (cefazolin, cefaclor, cephradine, cefalexin, etc), Cefoxitin (cefmetazole), Cefotaxime (ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem), Gentamicin (netilmicin, tobramycin), Ciprofloxacin (ofloxacin), Ofloxacin (levofloxacin). In Enterococci: Gentamicin synergy (gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and amikacin). Streptomycin synergy (streptomycin).</p><p>The results obtained in the study were grouped in different antibiotic activities:</p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against Gram-positive bacteria: a. Antibiotic activity against to <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. b. Antibiotic activity against <em>S epidermidis</em>. c. Antibiotic activity against <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> d. Antibiotic activity against <em>E. faecium.</em> e. Antibiotic activity against <em>Streptococcus agalactiae</em>.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against Gram-negative bacteria. a. Antibiotic activity against Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic activity against <em>Escherichia coli</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> and <em>K. oxytoca</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Enterobacter cloacae</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Serratia marcescens</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Proteus mirabilis</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Morganella morganii</em>.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against <em>Non</em>-<em>fermenting Gram</em>-<em>negative bacilli</em> (NFGNB). Antibiotic activity against <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em>.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against miscellaneous microorganisms. a. Antibiotic activity against <em>Branhamella catarrhalis</em>. b. Antibiotic activity against <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em>.</p></span></li></ul><p>Therefore, although many antibiotic-resistant bacteria exist, there are some strains that frequently cause infections and cannot be treated with common antibiotics. Consequently routinely-used therapeutic regimens should be changed. These bacteria are usually particularly virulent and cause serious infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35686,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Medica de Bilbao","volume":"108 1","pages":"Pages 15-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gmb.2011.02.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estudio de la actividad antibacteriana en un hospital terciario. Evolución durante el período 2000-2005\",\"authors\":\"A. Alberte Castiñeiras ,&nbsp;Ángel San Miguel Hernández ,&nbsp;M.J. Rodríguez Barbero ,&nbsp;C. Alberte Pérez ,&nbsp;P. Pérez Pascual\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gmb.2011.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Knowledge of the antibiotic resistance in a specific healthcare area is essential for suitable application of the antibiotic policy, which can be understood as the use of recommendations for the application and consumption of antimicrobial agents, as well as for education and continual surveillance to achieve the most effective, rational and least expensive antibiotic therapy possible.</p><p>We performed a study of antimicrobial susceptibility between 2000 and 2005 in the Health Area of the West of Valladolid (Spain) corresponding to the Rio Hortega University Hospital, with a catchment area of approximately 235,0000 inhabitants.</p><p>The microorganisms tested were obtained from isolates of distinct samples from patients with infectious processes. The agents were considered causal. The most frequently isolated agents were described.</p><p>The antibiotics tested were those that showed acceptable <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> activity against each isolated species. The criteria considered were clinical effectiveness, the prevalence of resistance, a low possibility of developing resistance, indications for clinical use and being the first treatment choice or alternative. The results were expressed in percentages of susceptibility or sensitivity to the antibiotics analyzed.</p><p>The sensitivity criteria of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (USA) were followed. The category of SENSITIVE to a given antibiotic implies that the infection caused by the isolated bacterium can suitably be treated with the routine dosage of this antibiotic. The RESISTANT category implies that isolated bacteria are not inhibited with the routine dosage of this antibiotic.</p><p>The antibiotic types studied followed general lines and the following agents were taken as representative of their class: Ampicillin (ampicillin and amoxicillin derivatives), Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid(ampicillin/sulbactam), Cefalotin (cefazolin, cefaclor, cephradine, cefalexin, etc), Cefoxitin (cefmetazole), Cefotaxime (ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem), Gentamicin (netilmicin, tobramycin), Ciprofloxacin (ofloxacin), Ofloxacin (levofloxacin). In Enterococci: Gentamicin synergy (gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and amikacin). Streptomycin synergy (streptomycin).</p><p>The results obtained in the study were grouped in different antibiotic activities:</p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against Gram-positive bacteria: a. Antibiotic activity against to <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. b. Antibiotic activity against <em>S epidermidis</em>. c. Antibiotic activity against <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> d. Antibiotic activity against <em>E. faecium.</em> e. Antibiotic activity against <em>Streptococcus agalactiae</em>.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against Gram-negative bacteria. a. Antibiotic activity against Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic activity against <em>Escherichia coli</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> and <em>K. oxytoca</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Enterobacter cloacae</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Serratia marcescens</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Proteus mirabilis</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Morganella morganii</em>.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against <em>Non</em>-<em>fermenting Gram</em>-<em>negative bacilli</em> (NFGNB). Antibiotic activity against <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em>. Antibiotic activity against <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em>.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>Antibiotic activity against miscellaneous microorganisms. a. Antibiotic activity against <em>Branhamella catarrhalis</em>. b. Antibiotic activity against <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em>.</p></span></li></ul><p>Therefore, although many antibiotic-resistant bacteria exist, there are some strains that frequently cause infections and cannot be treated with common antibiotics. Consequently routinely-used therapeutic regimens should be changed. These bacteria are usually particularly virulent and cause serious infections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Medica de Bilbao\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gmb.2011.02.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Medica de Bilbao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304485811000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Medica de Bilbao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304485811000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解特定卫生保健领域的抗生素耐药性对于适当实施抗生素政策至关重要,这可以理解为使用抗菌剂的应用和消费建议,以及教育和持续监测,以实现最有效、合理和最便宜的抗生素治疗。我们在2000年至2005年期间对巴利亚多利德西部卫生区(西班牙)的抗微生物药物敏感性进行了一项研究,该地区与里约奥尔特加大学医院相对应,集水区约有23.5万居民。所测试的微生物是从感染过程患者的不同样本分离物中获得的。这些因素被认为是因果关系。描述了最常被分离的药剂。测试的抗生素是那些在体外和体内对每个分离物种都显示出可接受的活性的抗生素。考虑的标准是临床有效性、耐药发生率、发生耐药的可能性低、临床使用的适应症以及作为第一治疗选择或替代方案。结果以对所分析抗生素的敏感性百分比表示。按照美国国家临床实验室标准委员会的敏感性标准。对某一抗生素敏感的类别意味着由分离的细菌引起的感染可以适当地用这种抗生素的常规剂量治疗。耐药类别意味着这种抗生素的常规剂量不能抑制分离的细菌。所研究的抗生素种类遵循一般路线,以下列药物为代表:氨苄西林(氨苄西林及阿莫西林衍生物)、阿莫西林/克拉维酸(氨苄西林/舒巴坦)、头孢丁(头孢唑林、头孢克洛、头孢定、头孢氨苄等)、头孢西丁(头孢美唑)、头孢噻肟(头孢曲松、亚胺培南、美罗培南)、庆大霉素(奈替米星、妥布霉素)、环丙沙星(氧氟沙星)、氧氟沙星(左氧氟沙星)。肠球菌:庆大霉素协同作用(庆大霉素、妥布霉素、奈替霉素和阿米卡星)。链霉素协同(链霉素)。本研究得到的结果按不同的抗生素活性进行分组:对革兰氏阳性细菌的抗生素活性:a.对金黄色葡萄球菌的抗生素活性。b.对表皮葡萄球菌的抗生素活性。c.对粪肠球菌的抗生素活性d.对粪肠球菌的抗生素活性e.对无乳链球菌的抗生素活性。抗革兰氏阴性菌的抗生素活性。a.对肠杆菌科的抗生素活性。对大肠杆菌的抗生素活性。对肺炎克雷伯菌和产氧克雷伯菌的抗生素活性。对阴沟肠杆菌的抗生素活性。对粘质沙雷氏菌的抗生素活性。对奇异变形杆菌的抗生素活性。2 .对摩根氏菌的抗菌活性。对非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌(NFGNB)的抗菌活性。对铜绿假单胞菌的抗菌活性。鲍曼不动杆菌的抗菌活性。对嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌的抗菌活性。对各种微生物的抗生素活性。a.抗卡他氏布氏菌的抗生素活性。b.抗流感嗜血杆菌的抗生素活性。因此,尽管存在许多耐抗生素细菌,但仍有一些菌株经常引起感染,无法用普通抗生素治疗。因此,应改变常规的治疗方案。这些细菌通常毒性特别强,会引起严重的感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estudio de la actividad antibacteriana en un hospital terciario. Evolución durante el período 2000-2005

Knowledge of the antibiotic resistance in a specific healthcare area is essential for suitable application of the antibiotic policy, which can be understood as the use of recommendations for the application and consumption of antimicrobial agents, as well as for education and continual surveillance to achieve the most effective, rational and least expensive antibiotic therapy possible.

We performed a study of antimicrobial susceptibility between 2000 and 2005 in the Health Area of the West of Valladolid (Spain) corresponding to the Rio Hortega University Hospital, with a catchment area of approximately 235,0000 inhabitants.

The microorganisms tested were obtained from isolates of distinct samples from patients with infectious processes. The agents were considered causal. The most frequently isolated agents were described.

The antibiotics tested were those that showed acceptable in vitro and in vivo activity against each isolated species. The criteria considered were clinical effectiveness, the prevalence of resistance, a low possibility of developing resistance, indications for clinical use and being the first treatment choice or alternative. The results were expressed in percentages of susceptibility or sensitivity to the antibiotics analyzed.

The sensitivity criteria of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (USA) were followed. The category of SENSITIVE to a given antibiotic implies that the infection caused by the isolated bacterium can suitably be treated with the routine dosage of this antibiotic. The RESISTANT category implies that isolated bacteria are not inhibited with the routine dosage of this antibiotic.

The antibiotic types studied followed general lines and the following agents were taken as representative of their class: Ampicillin (ampicillin and amoxicillin derivatives), Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid(ampicillin/sulbactam), Cefalotin (cefazolin, cefaclor, cephradine, cefalexin, etc), Cefoxitin (cefmetazole), Cefotaxime (ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem), Gentamicin (netilmicin, tobramycin), Ciprofloxacin (ofloxacin), Ofloxacin (levofloxacin). In Enterococci: Gentamicin synergy (gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and amikacin). Streptomycin synergy (streptomycin).

The results obtained in the study were grouped in different antibiotic activities:

  • 1.

    Antibiotic activity against Gram-positive bacteria: a. Antibiotic activity against to Staphylococcus aureus. b. Antibiotic activity against S epidermidis. c. Antibiotic activity against Enterococcus faecalis d. Antibiotic activity against E. faecium. e. Antibiotic activity against Streptococcus agalactiae.

  • 2.

    Antibiotic activity against Gram-negative bacteria. a. Antibiotic activity against Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic activity against Escherichia coli. Antibiotic activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca. Antibiotic activity against Enterobacter cloacae. Antibiotic activity against Serratia marcescens. Antibiotic activity against Proteus mirabilis. Antibiotic activity against Morganella morganii.

  • 3.

    Antibiotic activity against Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB). Antibiotic activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotic activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotic activity against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

  • 4.

    Antibiotic activity against miscellaneous microorganisms. a. Antibiotic activity against Branhamella catarrhalis. b. Antibiotic activity against Haemophilus influenzae.

Therefore, although many antibiotic-resistant bacteria exist, there are some strains that frequently cause infections and cannot be treated with common antibiotics. Consequently routinely-used therapeutic regimens should be changed. These bacteria are usually particularly virulent and cause serious infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gaceta Medica de Bilbao
Gaceta Medica de Bilbao Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluación quirúrgica de la linfadenectomía pélvica por laparoscopia en el tratamiento de neoplasias ginecológicas Técnica del ganglio centinela en el cáncer de colon Premios Dr. José Carrasco/D. Máximo de Aguirre. VI edición, 2012 Vómitos asociados al consumo de cannabis Deontología y colegios de médicos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1