服务质量影响交付决策:对坦桑尼亚农村产妇护理的定性研究

Angela Kimweri , Sabrina Hermosilla , Elysia Larson , Godfrey Mbaruku , Margaret E. Kruk
{"title":"服务质量影响交付决策:对坦桑尼亚农村产妇护理的定性研究","authors":"Angela Kimweri ,&nbsp;Sabrina Hermosilla ,&nbsp;Elysia Larson ,&nbsp;Godfrey Mbaruku ,&nbsp;Margaret E. Kruk","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The relationship between utilization of quality health services and positive health outcomes is well documented, however in low resource settings there is both a shortage of quality services and low utilization of existing services. We assessed women and men's understanding of quality in health facilities and their application of this understanding in selecting place of delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten focus group discussions (FGD) were held between May and December 2011 (five with women and five with men). The groups had 6–11 respondents. FGDs were conducted, recorded, and transcribed in Swahili then translated into English. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo 9 software. Conceptual framework confirmatory analysis was conducted to compare results from FGDs with pre-existing frameworks for understanding health center quality in low resource settings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>High education and positive attitude of delivery staff, close proximity to the health facility, availability of providers, and modern equipment were cited as reasons for facility delivery. Expectations of complications and better care led to seeking care at higher-level institutions. The one aspect of quality that men focused on more than women was disrespectful care and health worker attitude. The choice to deliver in a hospital versus a primary care clinic or at home was not always the woman's – it was greatly influenced by providers, the husband and the mother-in-law.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that quality improvement efforts should focus on both technical and nontechnical aspects of care and target not just women, but those who influence their choice of delivery location.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ISRCTN17107760.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.10.002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service quality influences delivery decisions: A qualitative study on maternity care in rural Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Angela Kimweri ,&nbsp;Sabrina Hermosilla ,&nbsp;Elysia Larson ,&nbsp;Godfrey Mbaruku ,&nbsp;Margaret E. Kruk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The relationship between utilization of quality health services and positive health outcomes is well documented, however in low resource settings there is both a shortage of quality services and low utilization of existing services. We assessed women and men's understanding of quality in health facilities and their application of this understanding in selecting place of delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten focus group discussions (FGD) were held between May and December 2011 (five with women and five with men). The groups had 6–11 respondents. FGDs were conducted, recorded, and transcribed in Swahili then translated into English. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo 9 software. Conceptual framework confirmatory analysis was conducted to compare results from FGDs with pre-existing frameworks for understanding health center quality in low resource settings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>High education and positive attitude of delivery staff, close proximity to the health facility, availability of providers, and modern equipment were cited as reasons for facility delivery. Expectations of complications and better care led to seeking care at higher-level institutions. The one aspect of quality that men focused on more than women was disrespectful care and health worker attitude. The choice to deliver in a hospital versus a primary care clinic or at home was not always the woman's – it was greatly influenced by providers, the husband and the mother-in-law.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that quality improvement efforts should focus on both technical and nontechnical aspects of care and target not just women, but those who influence their choice of delivery location.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ISRCTN17107760.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X16300523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X16300523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:利用优质保健服务与积极的健康结果之间的关系有据可查,但在资源匮乏的环境中,既缺乏优质服务,又缺乏对现有服务的利用。我们评估了妇女和男子对卫生设施质量的理解以及他们在选择分娩地点时运用这种理解的情况。方法于2011年5月至12月进行了10次焦点小组讨论(FGD)(女性5次,男性5次)。每个小组有6-11名受访者。fgd是用斯瓦希里语进行、记录和转录的,然后翻译成英语。使用NVivo 9软件分析转录本。概念框架验证性分析是为了比较fgd的结果与了解低资源环境下卫生中心质量的现有框架。结果分娩人员受教育程度高、态度积极、距离卫生机构近、服务提供者可及性强、设备现代化是分娩设施提供的主要原因。对并发症和更好护理的期望导致他们到更高级别的机构寻求治疗。男性比女性更关注质量的一个方面是不尊重护理和卫生工作者的态度。选择在医院分娩还是在初级保健诊所或在家中分娩并不总是由妇女决定——这在很大程度上受到提供者、丈夫和婆婆的影响。结论:这些结果表明,质量改进工作应集中在护理的技术和非技术方面,不仅针对妇女,而且针对那些影响她们选择分娩地点的人。registrationISRCTN17107760审判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Service quality influences delivery decisions: A qualitative study on maternity care in rural Tanzania

Background

The relationship between utilization of quality health services and positive health outcomes is well documented, however in low resource settings there is both a shortage of quality services and low utilization of existing services. We assessed women and men's understanding of quality in health facilities and their application of this understanding in selecting place of delivery.

Methods

Ten focus group discussions (FGD) were held between May and December 2011 (five with women and five with men). The groups had 6–11 respondents. FGDs were conducted, recorded, and transcribed in Swahili then translated into English. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo 9 software. Conceptual framework confirmatory analysis was conducted to compare results from FGDs with pre-existing frameworks for understanding health center quality in low resource settings.

Results

High education and positive attitude of delivery staff, close proximity to the health facility, availability of providers, and modern equipment were cited as reasons for facility delivery. Expectations of complications and better care led to seeking care at higher-level institutions. The one aspect of quality that men focused on more than women was disrespectful care and health worker attitude. The choice to deliver in a hospital versus a primary care clinic or at home was not always the woman's – it was greatly influenced by providers, the husband and the mother-in-law.

Conclusions

These results suggest that quality improvement efforts should focus on both technical and nontechnical aspects of care and target not just women, but those who influence their choice of delivery location.

Trial registration

ISRCTN17107760.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fate of the germ cells in mammalian ovary: A review Endocrine disruption and female reproductive health: Implications on cross-talk between endocrine and autocrine/paracrine axes in the ovary Cyclic nucleotides regulate oocyte meiotic maturation and quality in mammals Gene profiling the window of implantation: Microarray analyses from human and rodent models Does elevated serum progesterone on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration decrease live birth rates?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1