2016年新代孕条例草案:排除是有效监管的唯一形式吗?

Soma Dey
{"title":"2016年新代孕条例草案:排除是有效监管的唯一形式吗?","authors":"Soma Dey","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we discuss some of the features of the New Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 in India and ask whether the extreme step of a complete ban on commercial surrogacy is an appropriate response to the underlying issue of exploitation of surrogate mothers and children. The paper asserts that the negative externality associated with commercial surrogacy is low. Appropriate regulations can ensure that the rights of surrogate mothers are protected and both the parties to the process are equipped to understand the consequences of their choices. The non-availability of even altruistic surrogacy for certain groups of people has been criticized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.11.005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The New Surrogacy Bill 2016: Is exclusion the only form of effective regulation?\",\"authors\":\"Soma Dey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we discuss some of the features of the New Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 in India and ask whether the extreme step of a complete ban on commercial surrogacy is an appropriate response to the underlying issue of exploitation of surrogate mothers and children. The paper asserts that the negative externality associated with commercial surrogacy is low. Appropriate regulations can ensure that the rights of surrogate mothers are protected and both the parties to the process are equipped to understand the consequences of their choices. The non-availability of even altruistic surrogacy for certain groups of people has been criticized.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.11.005\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X16300808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X16300808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了印度2016年新代孕(监管)法案的一些特点,并询问完全禁止商业代孕的极端步骤是否是对剥削代孕母亲和儿童这一潜在问题的适当回应。本文认为,与商业代孕相关的负外部性较低。适当的法规可以确保代孕母亲的权利得到保护,代孕过程的双方都有能力了解自己选择的后果。某些群体甚至无法获得无私的代孕,这一点受到了批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The New Surrogacy Bill 2016: Is exclusion the only form of effective regulation?

In this paper we discuss some of the features of the New Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 in India and ask whether the extreme step of a complete ban on commercial surrogacy is an appropriate response to the underlying issue of exploitation of surrogate mothers and children. The paper asserts that the negative externality associated with commercial surrogacy is low. Appropriate regulations can ensure that the rights of surrogate mothers are protected and both the parties to the process are equipped to understand the consequences of their choices. The non-availability of even altruistic surrogacy for certain groups of people has been criticized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fate of the germ cells in mammalian ovary: A review Endocrine disruption and female reproductive health: Implications on cross-talk between endocrine and autocrine/paracrine axes in the ovary Cyclic nucleotides regulate oocyte meiotic maturation and quality in mammals Gene profiling the window of implantation: Microarray analyses from human and rodent models Does elevated serum progesterone on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration decrease live birth rates?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1