职业生活方式再设计方案对中风的长期疗效

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.09.001
Serena S.W. Ng, Dora Y.L. Chan, Marko K.L. Chan, Kathy K.Y. Chow
{"title":"职业生活方式再设计方案对中风的长期疗效","authors":"Serena S.W. Ng,&nbsp;Dora Y.L. Chan,&nbsp;Marko K.L. Chan,&nbsp;Kathy K.Y. Chow","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>To devise an Occupational Lifestyle Redesign Programme (OLSR), in addition to the existing conventional therapy programme, in a local rehabilitation hospital in order to help stroke outpatients improve their self-efficacy and commitment in self-management after a stroke attack using goal-oriented, challenging, and well-being building activities. The long-term effect on the poststroke quality of life (QOL) and community integration has to be explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective study performed to compare two groups of matched samples of participants (25 each) who have or have not joined the OLSR programme. A telephonic interview was performed to gather the participants' responses. Self-reported outcome measures, including sickness impact [Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 (SA-SIP30)], motivation for general activity [General Activity Motivation Measure (GAMM)], community integration (Community Integration Questionnaire), and subjective well-being [World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)] scores were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Subjective well-being measures had significantly higher scores in the OLSR group (<em>F</em> = 5.52; <em>p</em> = .023). The OLSR group also reported a significantly better score in social integration (<em>F</em> = 4.302; <em>p</em> = .043). The SA-SIP30 mean score of the OLSR group [mean = 6.64; standard deviation (SD) = 4.35] was much lower, however, with significant difference in Mobility (<em>F</em> = 4.47; <em>p</em> = .04) and Household Management (<em>F</em> = 6; <em>p</em> = .015) subscores. The mean score of GAMM was also high in the OLSR group (mean = 41.32; SD = 11.98; <em>p</em> = .06). Improving “productive activity,” “social interaction,” “home management,” and “emotion” scores (based on factor analysis) are important goals to be achieved in a stroke rehabilitation programme so as to extend its scope from just physical restoration to building a better poststroke life.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The positive effect of OLSR programme has been shown to be effective in filling the gap of psychosocial adaptation in conventional stroke rehabilitation programmes. The patients in the OLSR programme had improved motivation levels and predicted better QOL in long term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.09.001","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Efficacy of Occupational Lifestyle Redesign Programme for Strokes\",\"authors\":\"Serena S.W. Ng,&nbsp;Dora Y.L. Chan,&nbsp;Marko K.L. Chan,&nbsp;Kathy K.Y. Chow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>To devise an Occupational Lifestyle Redesign Programme (OLSR), in addition to the existing conventional therapy programme, in a local rehabilitation hospital in order to help stroke outpatients improve their self-efficacy and commitment in self-management after a stroke attack using goal-oriented, challenging, and well-being building activities. The long-term effect on the poststroke quality of life (QOL) and community integration has to be explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective study performed to compare two groups of matched samples of participants (25 each) who have or have not joined the OLSR programme. A telephonic interview was performed to gather the participants' responses. Self-reported outcome measures, including sickness impact [Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 (SA-SIP30)], motivation for general activity [General Activity Motivation Measure (GAMM)], community integration (Community Integration Questionnaire), and subjective well-being [World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)] scores were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Subjective well-being measures had significantly higher scores in the OLSR group (<em>F</em> = 5.52; <em>p</em> = .023). The OLSR group also reported a significantly better score in social integration (<em>F</em> = 4.302; <em>p</em> = .043). The SA-SIP30 mean score of the OLSR group [mean = 6.64; standard deviation (SD) = 4.35] was much lower, however, with significant difference in Mobility (<em>F</em> = 4.47; <em>p</em> = .04) and Household Management (<em>F</em> = 6; <em>p</em> = .015) subscores. The mean score of GAMM was also high in the OLSR group (mean = 41.32; SD = 11.98; <em>p</em> = .06). Improving “productive activity,” “social interaction,” “home management,” and “emotion” scores (based on factor analysis) are important goals to be achieved in a stroke rehabilitation programme so as to extend its scope from just physical restoration to building a better poststroke life.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The positive effect of OLSR programme has been shown to be effective in filling the gap of psychosocial adaptation in conventional stroke rehabilitation programmes. The patients in the OLSR programme had improved motivation levels and predicted better QOL in long term.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186113000430\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186113000430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

目的/背景:在当地康复医院现有常规治疗方案的基础上,设计职业生活方式再设计方案(OLSR),通过目标导向、挑战性和幸福感建设活动,帮助中风门诊患者提高卒中发作后的自我效能感和自我管理承诺。对脑卒中后生活质量(QOL)和社区融合的长期影响有待探讨。方法这是一项回顾性研究,比较两组匹配的参与者样本(每组25人),他们有或没有参加OLSR计划。通过电话采访收集了参与者的回答。评估了自我报告的结果测量,包括疾病影响[卒中适应性疾病影响概况-30 (SA-SIP30)]、一般活动动机[一般活动动机测量(GAMM)]、社区整合(社区整合问卷)和主观幸福感[世界卫生组织幸福指数(WHO-5)]得分。结果OLSR组主观幸福感得分显著高于对照组(F = 5.52;p = .023)。OLSR组在社会整合方面的得分也显著提高(F = 4.302;p = .043)。OLSR组SA-SIP30平均评分[mean = 6.64;标准偏差(SD) = 4.35)要低得多,但流动性差异显著(F = 4.47;p = .04)和家庭管理(F = 6;P = .015)。OLSR组GAMM平均评分也较高(平均= 41.32;sd = 11.98;p = .06)。提高“生产活动”、“社会互动”、“家庭管理”和“情绪”分数(基于因素分析)是中风康复计划的重要目标,以便将其范围从仅仅是身体恢复扩展到建立更好的中风后生活。结论OLSR方案的积极作用可有效填补常规脑卒中康复方案中心理社会适应的空白。OLSR方案患者的动机水平提高,预测长期生活质量较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term Efficacy of Occupational Lifestyle Redesign Programme for Strokes

Objective/Background

To devise an Occupational Lifestyle Redesign Programme (OLSR), in addition to the existing conventional therapy programme, in a local rehabilitation hospital in order to help stroke outpatients improve their self-efficacy and commitment in self-management after a stroke attack using goal-oriented, challenging, and well-being building activities. The long-term effect on the poststroke quality of life (QOL) and community integration has to be explored.

Methods

This is a retrospective study performed to compare two groups of matched samples of participants (25 each) who have or have not joined the OLSR programme. A telephonic interview was performed to gather the participants' responses. Self-reported outcome measures, including sickness impact [Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 (SA-SIP30)], motivation for general activity [General Activity Motivation Measure (GAMM)], community integration (Community Integration Questionnaire), and subjective well-being [World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)] scores were assessed.

Results

Subjective well-being measures had significantly higher scores in the OLSR group (F = 5.52; p = .023). The OLSR group also reported a significantly better score in social integration (F = 4.302; p = .043). The SA-SIP30 mean score of the OLSR group [mean = 6.64; standard deviation (SD) = 4.35] was much lower, however, with significant difference in Mobility (F = 4.47; p = .04) and Household Management (F = 6; p = .015) subscores. The mean score of GAMM was also high in the OLSR group (mean = 41.32; SD = 11.98; p = .06). Improving “productive activity,” “social interaction,” “home management,” and “emotion” scores (based on factor analysis) are important goals to be achieved in a stroke rehabilitation programme so as to extend its scope from just physical restoration to building a better poststroke life.

Conclusion

The positive effect of OLSR programme has been shown to be effective in filling the gap of psychosocial adaptation in conventional stroke rehabilitation programmes. The patients in the OLSR programme had improved motivation levels and predicted better QOL in long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
期刊最新文献
Validity and reliability of the functional test for hemiplegic upper Extremity–Thai version Stigma and the use of umbrellas, hiking poles and walking sticks to aid walking in Hong Kong Application of the participatory design in the testing of a baropodometric insole prototype for weight-bearing asymmetry after a stroke: A qualitative study Smartwatch-based functional assessment for upper extremity impairment after musculoskeletal injuries: A pilot study Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1