{"title":"[我们对非骨水泥等弹性全髋关节假体的经验]。","authors":"T Marega, G Feroldi, L Marega","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between May 1981 and May 1987, 250 isoelastic hip prostheses were implanted. The first 180 (from May '81 till May '86) were called for a visit. 130 (72%) came and were assessed with a minimum review time of 1 year. We ignore the reasons for which 28% of the patients did not turn up (death or others). 81% of the patients had good or very good results after surgery. Three patients developed infections (2.3%); none of these was revised. Four developed loosening of the femoral component; two of these underwent revision surgery and are doing well now. We did not notice any loosening of the acetabular component. The recommended period of gait support was of 2 months of no weight bearing with two canes and of two months of partial weight bearing with one cane. No component had broken. We had 1 femoral fracture incurred during surgery which healed with routine management. These early results are very encouraging, but the effectiveness of this prosthesis will require longer follow-up data to be confirmed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75545,"journal":{"name":"Archivio \"Putti\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento","volume":"37 1","pages":"65-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Our experience with the uncemented isoelastic total hip prosthesis].\",\"authors\":\"T Marega, G Feroldi, L Marega\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Between May 1981 and May 1987, 250 isoelastic hip prostheses were implanted. The first 180 (from May '81 till May '86) were called for a visit. 130 (72%) came and were assessed with a minimum review time of 1 year. We ignore the reasons for which 28% of the patients did not turn up (death or others). 81% of the patients had good or very good results after surgery. Three patients developed infections (2.3%); none of these was revised. Four developed loosening of the femoral component; two of these underwent revision surgery and are doing well now. We did not notice any loosening of the acetabular component. The recommended period of gait support was of 2 months of no weight bearing with two canes and of two months of partial weight bearing with one cane. No component had broken. We had 1 femoral fracture incurred during surgery which healed with routine management. These early results are very encouraging, but the effectiveness of this prosthesis will require longer follow-up data to be confirmed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivio \\\"Putti\\\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"65-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivio \\\"Putti\\\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio \"Putti\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Our experience with the uncemented isoelastic total hip prosthesis].
Between May 1981 and May 1987, 250 isoelastic hip prostheses were implanted. The first 180 (from May '81 till May '86) were called for a visit. 130 (72%) came and were assessed with a minimum review time of 1 year. We ignore the reasons for which 28% of the patients did not turn up (death or others). 81% of the patients had good or very good results after surgery. Three patients developed infections (2.3%); none of these was revised. Four developed loosening of the femoral component; two of these underwent revision surgery and are doing well now. We did not notice any loosening of the acetabular component. The recommended period of gait support was of 2 months of no weight bearing with two canes and of two months of partial weight bearing with one cane. No component had broken. We had 1 femoral fracture incurred during surgery which healed with routine management. These early results are very encouraging, but the effectiveness of this prosthesis will require longer follow-up data to be confirmed.