在集料(砂和砾石)坑和自然生境中繁殖的滩燕的洞穴占用和河岸持久性的影响因素

Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI:10.1111/jofo.12385
Tianna R. Burke, Michael D. Cadman, Erica Nol
{"title":"在集料(砂和砾石)坑和自然生境中繁殖的滩燕的洞穴占用和河岸持久性的影响因素","authors":"Tianna R. Burke,&nbsp;Michael D. Cadman,&nbsp;Erica Nol","doi":"10.1111/jofo.12385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As the availability of natural nesting habitat for Bank Swallows (<i>Riparia riparia</i>) continues to decline, operational aggregate (sand and gravel) pits have begun to provide alternative nesting habitat. With best management practices being developed and revised for the aggregate industry, an understanding of site factors affecting burrow and bank occupancy by Bank Swallows is needed. We compared patterns of burrow occupancy of breeding Bank Swallows in lakeshore and aggregate habitats and documented other potential factors that could influence occupancy levels using data collected over a two-year period. We also used a larger sample of data from other studies collected over longer time periods to compare the persistence of colonies in lakeshore, riverbank, and aggregate habitats. In both habitats, rates of burrow occupancy were impacted by colony size and bank-face height. At lakeshore sites, burrow occupancy decreased in low burrows with increasing colony size whereas, in medium/high burrows, there was no relationship between colony size and burrow occupancy. In aggregate pits, burrow occupancy in low burrows increased rapidly with colony size, whereas in medium/high burrows, occupancy increased only slightly as colony size increased. Colonies of Bank Swallows in lakeshore bluffs were the most persistent, whereas those in aggregate pits had the lowest year-to-year persistence, likely due to annual removal of targeted resources. Colonies in aggregate pits were more likely to persist from one year to the next if the previous year’s colony was large, and faces &gt; 200 m<sup>2</sup>. Although colonies at natural sites were the most persistent over time, the aggregate pit industry can play an active role in the conservation of this threatened species by encouraging pit operators to maintain large, tall, vertical faces on stable, unused banks to increase the probability of Bank Swallows recolonizing these sites in future years.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting burrow occupancy and bank persistence for Bank Swallows breeding in aggregate (sand and gravel) pits and natural habitats\",\"authors\":\"Tianna R. Burke,&nbsp;Michael D. Cadman,&nbsp;Erica Nol\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jofo.12385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>As the availability of natural nesting habitat for Bank Swallows (<i>Riparia riparia</i>) continues to decline, operational aggregate (sand and gravel) pits have begun to provide alternative nesting habitat. With best management practices being developed and revised for the aggregate industry, an understanding of site factors affecting burrow and bank occupancy by Bank Swallows is needed. We compared patterns of burrow occupancy of breeding Bank Swallows in lakeshore and aggregate habitats and documented other potential factors that could influence occupancy levels using data collected over a two-year period. We also used a larger sample of data from other studies collected over longer time periods to compare the persistence of colonies in lakeshore, riverbank, and aggregate habitats. In both habitats, rates of burrow occupancy were impacted by colony size and bank-face height. At lakeshore sites, burrow occupancy decreased in low burrows with increasing colony size whereas, in medium/high burrows, there was no relationship between colony size and burrow occupancy. In aggregate pits, burrow occupancy in low burrows increased rapidly with colony size, whereas in medium/high burrows, occupancy increased only slightly as colony size increased. Colonies of Bank Swallows in lakeshore bluffs were the most persistent, whereas those in aggregate pits had the lowest year-to-year persistence, likely due to annual removal of targeted resources. Colonies in aggregate pits were more likely to persist from one year to the next if the previous year’s colony was large, and faces &gt; 200 m<sup>2</sup>. Although colonies at natural sites were the most persistent over time, the aggregate pit industry can play an active role in the conservation of this threatened species by encouraging pit operators to maintain large, tall, vertical faces on stable, unused banks to increase the probability of Bank Swallows recolonizing these sites in future years.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jofo.12385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jofo.12385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着河岸燕子(Riparia Riparia)自然筑巢栖息地的不断减少,可操作的集料(沙子和砾石)坑开始提供替代的筑巢栖息地。随着最佳管理实践的发展和修订,需要了解影响银燕子在洞穴和银行占用的场地因素。我们比较了繁殖岸燕在湖岸和聚集栖息地的洞穴占用模式,并利用收集的两年数据记录了可能影响占用水平的其他潜在因素。我们还使用了从其他研究中收集的更大样本数据,这些数据收集了更长的时间,以比较殖民地在湖岸,河岸和聚集栖息地的持久性。在两种生境中,洞穴占用率都受到蚁群大小和河岸高度的影响。在湖岸样地,低洞的洞穴占用率随着群体大小的增加而降低,而在中/高洞中,群体大小与洞穴占用率没有关系。在聚落坑中,低洞的洞穴占用率随群体大小的增加而迅速增加,而中/高洞的洞穴占用率随群体大小的增加而略有增加。湖岸悬崖上的岸燕最持久,而聚集坑里的岸燕的年持久性最低,可能是由于目标资源每年都被移除。如果前一年的蜂群规模较大,且面积为200 m2,则聚集坑中的蜂群更有可能持续一年到下一年。虽然在自然地点的殖民地随着时间的推移是最持久的,但通过鼓励坑经营者在稳定的、未使用的河岸上保持大、高、垂直的表面,以增加岸燕在未来几年重新定居这些地点的可能性,集坑行业可以在保护这一受威胁物种方面发挥积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Factors affecting burrow occupancy and bank persistence for Bank Swallows breeding in aggregate (sand and gravel) pits and natural habitats

As the availability of natural nesting habitat for Bank Swallows (Riparia riparia) continues to decline, operational aggregate (sand and gravel) pits have begun to provide alternative nesting habitat. With best management practices being developed and revised for the aggregate industry, an understanding of site factors affecting burrow and bank occupancy by Bank Swallows is needed. We compared patterns of burrow occupancy of breeding Bank Swallows in lakeshore and aggregate habitats and documented other potential factors that could influence occupancy levels using data collected over a two-year period. We also used a larger sample of data from other studies collected over longer time periods to compare the persistence of colonies in lakeshore, riverbank, and aggregate habitats. In both habitats, rates of burrow occupancy were impacted by colony size and bank-face height. At lakeshore sites, burrow occupancy decreased in low burrows with increasing colony size whereas, in medium/high burrows, there was no relationship between colony size and burrow occupancy. In aggregate pits, burrow occupancy in low burrows increased rapidly with colony size, whereas in medium/high burrows, occupancy increased only slightly as colony size increased. Colonies of Bank Swallows in lakeshore bluffs were the most persistent, whereas those in aggregate pits had the lowest year-to-year persistence, likely due to annual removal of targeted resources. Colonies in aggregate pits were more likely to persist from one year to the next if the previous year’s colony was large, and faces > 200 m2. Although colonies at natural sites were the most persistent over time, the aggregate pit industry can play an active role in the conservation of this threatened species by encouraging pit operators to maintain large, tall, vertical faces on stable, unused banks to increase the probability of Bank Swallows recolonizing these sites in future years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1