铊-201单光子发射计算机断层扫描检测跨壁心肌梗死:与平面成像的比较。

F M Ho, M L Han, H M Lo, P J Huang
{"title":"铊-201单光子发射计算机断层扫描检测跨壁心肌梗死:与平面成像的比较。","authors":"F M Ho,&nbsp;M L Han,&nbsp;H M Lo,&nbsp;P J Huang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with thallium-201 to detect transmural myocardial infarction was compared with that of planar imaging. Planar imaging was performed at rest after SPECT in 80 patients with the first myocardial infarction and in 20 patients without myocardial infarction. The planar and SPECT images were interpreted qualitatively. Tomography was significantly more sensitive than planar imaging in detecting inferior infarctions (43/46 or 93% vs 22/46 or 48%; p less than 0.05). In detecting anterior infarctions, the sensitivity rate was 92% (35/38) for SPECT and 79% (30/38) for planar imaging (p = NS). The overall sensitivity was 93% for tomography and 63% for planar imaging (p less than 0.05). The specificity was similar (100%) with the 2 techniques. It is concluded that SPECT significantly improves the detection of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects in patients with myocardial infarctions, especially those occurring on the inferior wall.</p>","PeriodicalId":22189,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of transmural myocardial infarction by single-photon emission computed tomography with thallium-201: comparison with planar imaging.\",\"authors\":\"F M Ho,&nbsp;M L Han,&nbsp;H M Lo,&nbsp;P J Huang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with thallium-201 to detect transmural myocardial infarction was compared with that of planar imaging. Planar imaging was performed at rest after SPECT in 80 patients with the first myocardial infarction and in 20 patients without myocardial infarction. The planar and SPECT images were interpreted qualitatively. Tomography was significantly more sensitive than planar imaging in detecting inferior infarctions (43/46 or 93% vs 22/46 or 48%; p less than 0.05). In detecting anterior infarctions, the sensitivity rate was 92% (35/38) for SPECT and 79% (30/38) for planar imaging (p = NS). The overall sensitivity was 93% for tomography and 63% for planar imaging (p less than 0.05). The specificity was similar (100%) with the 2 techniques. It is concluded that SPECT significantly improves the detection of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects in patients with myocardial infarctions, especially those occurring on the inferior wall.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了铊-201单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)与平面成像对跨壁心肌梗死的检测能力。80例首发心肌梗死患者和20例无心肌梗死患者在静息时行SPECT平面显像。对平面和SPECT图像进行定性解译。在检测下端梗死时,断层扫描明显比平面成像更敏感(43/46或93% vs 22/46或48%;P < 0.05)。在检测前壁梗死时,SPECT的敏感性为92%(35/38),平面成像的敏感性为79% (30/38)(p = NS)。断层扫描的总灵敏度为93%,平面成像的总灵敏度为63% (p < 0.05)。两种方法的特异性相似(100%)。结论SPECT能显著提高心肌梗死患者铊-201心肌灌注缺损的检出率,特别是对发生在下壁的心肌梗死。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of transmural myocardial infarction by single-photon emission computed tomography with thallium-201: comparison with planar imaging.

The ability of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with thallium-201 to detect transmural myocardial infarction was compared with that of planar imaging. Planar imaging was performed at rest after SPECT in 80 patients with the first myocardial infarction and in 20 patients without myocardial infarction. The planar and SPECT images were interpreted qualitatively. Tomography was significantly more sensitive than planar imaging in detecting inferior infarctions (43/46 or 93% vs 22/46 or 48%; p less than 0.05). In detecting anterior infarctions, the sensitivity rate was 92% (35/38) for SPECT and 79% (30/38) for planar imaging (p = NS). The overall sensitivity was 93% for tomography and 63% for planar imaging (p less than 0.05). The specificity was similar (100%) with the 2 techniques. It is concluded that SPECT significantly improves the detection of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects in patients with myocardial infarctions, especially those occurring on the inferior wall.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rapid spectrophotometric method for quantitation of acetaminophen in serum. Apolipoproteins A-I and B in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Postoperative echocardiographic study of patients with symptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation. Cytomegalovirus retinitis treated with ganciclovir in a renal transplant recipient. Anterior pituitary functions in patients with uremia tested by stimulation with four combined hypothalamic releasing hormones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1