2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-对二恶英毒性机制的批判性观点。对人体安全评估的影响。

K Rozman
{"title":"2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-对二恶英毒性机制的批判性观点。对人体安全评估的影响。","authors":"K Rozman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) has been an important issue in occupational and environmental health for nearly two decades. During this period scientists have studied its possible impacts on exposed human populations. At the same time enormous efforts were made to elucidate the mechanism of TCDD action in various biological models. This paper provides a critical view of the advances made towards understanding the mechanism of TCDD action. Major topics discussed include the Ah-receptor hypothesis, TCDD as a thyroid hormone agonist, TCDD and vitamin A deficiency, TCDD's effect on receptor regulation, and its effect on intermediary metabolism including related hormonal responses. Although the exact mechanism of TCDD action is not yet known, more information is available on the toxicity of this compound than perhaps on that of any other substance. This wealth of information allows important conclusions regarding the assessment of acute, as well as of chronic, toxicities of TCDD for humans. There is no documented case of human death as a result of exposure to TCDD. It appears that humans are acutely less sensitive to TCDD than some animal species. The cause of TCDD-induced lethality in rats is a progressive lethal hypoglycemia due to inhibition of gluconeogenesis. Regulation of this metabolic pathway is quite different amongst species, although primates share great similarities. The assumption that the cause of TCDD-induced death in primates, in analogy to rats, is inhibition of gluconeogenesis would suggest that the acute toxicity of TCDD in humans would be in the range seen in rhesus monkeys (70-300 micrograms/kg). These values are about midway between the most (guinea pig) and least (hamster) sensitive species. TCDD is not a genotoxic agent and not an initiator, but promoter of tumor formation. There is considerable evidence that promotion of cancer, like any other chronic end point of toxicity, is a threshold-type biological process. Therefore, a linear extrapolation of the dose-response is an unnecessarily conservative approach in the safety assessment of TCDD. This paper, based on several studies with different end points of toxicity, supports the notion that 10 pg/kg/day of TCDD represent a safe lifetime exposure level for humans with regard to promotion of cancer, porphyria and chloracne.</p>","PeriodicalId":11073,"journal":{"name":"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment","volume":"37 3","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical view of the mechanism(s) of toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Implications for human safety assessment.\",\"authors\":\"K Rozman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) has been an important issue in occupational and environmental health for nearly two decades. During this period scientists have studied its possible impacts on exposed human populations. At the same time enormous efforts were made to elucidate the mechanism of TCDD action in various biological models. This paper provides a critical view of the advances made towards understanding the mechanism of TCDD action. Major topics discussed include the Ah-receptor hypothesis, TCDD as a thyroid hormone agonist, TCDD and vitamin A deficiency, TCDD's effect on receptor regulation, and its effect on intermediary metabolism including related hormonal responses. Although the exact mechanism of TCDD action is not yet known, more information is available on the toxicity of this compound than perhaps on that of any other substance. This wealth of information allows important conclusions regarding the assessment of acute, as well as of chronic, toxicities of TCDD for humans. There is no documented case of human death as a result of exposure to TCDD. It appears that humans are acutely less sensitive to TCDD than some animal species. The cause of TCDD-induced lethality in rats is a progressive lethal hypoglycemia due to inhibition of gluconeogenesis. Regulation of this metabolic pathway is quite different amongst species, although primates share great similarities. The assumption that the cause of TCDD-induced death in primates, in analogy to rats, is inhibition of gluconeogenesis would suggest that the acute toxicity of TCDD in humans would be in the range seen in rhesus monkeys (70-300 micrograms/kg). These values are about midway between the most (guinea pig) and least (hamster) sensitive species. TCDD is not a genotoxic agent and not an initiator, but promoter of tumor formation. There is considerable evidence that promotion of cancer, like any other chronic end point of toxicity, is a threshold-type biological process. Therefore, a linear extrapolation of the dose-response is an unnecessarily conservative approach in the safety assessment of TCDD. This paper, based on several studies with different end points of toxicity, supports the notion that 10 pg/kg/day of TCDD represent a safe lifetime exposure level for humans with regard to promotion of cancer, porphyria and chloracne.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"81-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近二十年来,2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-对二恶英(TCDD)一直是职业和环境卫生领域的一个重要问题。在此期间,科学家们研究了它对受辐射人群可能产生的影响。同时,在阐明TCDD在各种生物模型中的作用机制方面也做了大量的工作。本文对TCDD作用机制的研究进展进行了评述。主要讨论的主题包括ah受体假说、TCDD作为甲状腺激素激动剂、TCDD与维生素a缺乏、TCDD对受体调节的影响、TCDD对包括相关激素反应在内的中间代谢的影响。虽然TCDD作用的确切机制尚不清楚,但关于这种化合物毒性的信息可能比关于任何其他物质的信息都要多。这些丰富的信息使我们能够就TCDD对人类的急性和慢性毒性评估得出重要结论。没有记录在案的人类因接触TCDD而死亡的病例。看来人类对TCDD的敏感性明显低于某些动物物种。tcdd致大鼠死亡的原因是由于抑制糖异生导致进行性致死性低血糖。尽管灵长类动物有很大的相似之处,但这种代谢途径的调节在物种之间是完全不同的。与大鼠类似,假设TCDD在灵长类动物中导致死亡的原因是糖异生的抑制,这表明TCDD对人类的急性毒性在恒河猴中所见的范围内(70-300微克/公斤)。这些数值介于最敏感物种(豚鼠)和最不敏感物种(仓鼠)之间。TCDD不是基因毒性物质,也不是引发剂,而是肿瘤形成的促进剂。有相当多的证据表明,促进癌症,像任何其他慢性毒性终点一样,是一个阈值型生物过程。因此,在TCDD的安全性评估中,剂量反应的线性外推是一种不必要的保守方法。本文基于几项具有不同毒性终点的研究,支持这样一种观点,即10 pg/kg/天的TCDD是人类在促进癌症、卟啉症和氯痤疮方面的安全终生暴露水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A critical view of the mechanism(s) of toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Implications for human safety assessment.

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) has been an important issue in occupational and environmental health for nearly two decades. During this period scientists have studied its possible impacts on exposed human populations. At the same time enormous efforts were made to elucidate the mechanism of TCDD action in various biological models. This paper provides a critical view of the advances made towards understanding the mechanism of TCDD action. Major topics discussed include the Ah-receptor hypothesis, TCDD as a thyroid hormone agonist, TCDD and vitamin A deficiency, TCDD's effect on receptor regulation, and its effect on intermediary metabolism including related hormonal responses. Although the exact mechanism of TCDD action is not yet known, more information is available on the toxicity of this compound than perhaps on that of any other substance. This wealth of information allows important conclusions regarding the assessment of acute, as well as of chronic, toxicities of TCDD for humans. There is no documented case of human death as a result of exposure to TCDD. It appears that humans are acutely less sensitive to TCDD than some animal species. The cause of TCDD-induced lethality in rats is a progressive lethal hypoglycemia due to inhibition of gluconeogenesis. Regulation of this metabolic pathway is quite different amongst species, although primates share great similarities. The assumption that the cause of TCDD-induced death in primates, in analogy to rats, is inhibition of gluconeogenesis would suggest that the acute toxicity of TCDD in humans would be in the range seen in rhesus monkeys (70-300 micrograms/kg). These values are about midway between the most (guinea pig) and least (hamster) sensitive species. TCDD is not a genotoxic agent and not an initiator, but promoter of tumor formation. There is considerable evidence that promotion of cancer, like any other chronic end point of toxicity, is a threshold-type biological process. Therefore, a linear extrapolation of the dose-response is an unnecessarily conservative approach in the safety assessment of TCDD. This paper, based on several studies with different end points of toxicity, supports the notion that 10 pg/kg/day of TCDD represent a safe lifetime exposure level for humans with regard to promotion of cancer, porphyria and chloracne.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Allergic contact eczema caused by rubber-containing substances simulating pustulosis palmaris]. [Phytophotodermatitis caused by plant trimming (edger's rash)]. [Occupational progressive systemic sclerodermia caused by a quartz-containing scouring agent]. [Significance of laundry detergent residues from a dermato-toxicological viewpoint]. An international survey on the prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1