Emma F Lodl, Mohammad H Alshaer, C Brooke Adams, Ashley Richards, Charles Peloquin, Veena Venugopalan
{"title":"头孢吡肟在发热性中性粒细胞减少伴恶性血液病患者中的应用监测。","authors":"Emma F Lodl, Mohammad H Alshaer, C Brooke Adams, Ashley Richards, Charles Peloquin, Veena Venugopalan","doi":"10.1177/10781552231213883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin and is a workhorse for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a dose optimization strategy in patient populations with altered kinetics. Prior literature has demonstrated that patients with FN exhibit augmented renal clearance which may lead to subtherapeutic drug concentrations with standard dosing regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and clinical outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN who were treated empirically with cefepime.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center study of adults with hematologic malignancies and FN admitted to the inpatient unit. The primary outcome was PK/PD target attainment (defined as 100% free time greater than minimum inhibitory concentration (100% <i>f</i>T > MIC)). Secondary clinical outcomes were time to defervescence, time to ANC recovery, in-hospital mortality, and cefepime failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 55 patients in our study. Forty-three (78%) patients achieved the primary outcome of PK/PD target attainment. The mean time to defervescence was similar between those that achieved PK/PD target attainment and those that did not (95% CI -0.75 to 1.25, p = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that standard cefepime dosing in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN does not result in achievement of 100% <i>f</i>T > MIC in all patients. Patients in the group that did not achieve PK/PD target attainment were younger with increased creatinine clearance, indicating that cefepime TDM may be especially beneficial in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1207-1213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring in febrile neutropenia patients with hematologic malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Emma F Lodl, Mohammad H Alshaer, C Brooke Adams, Ashley Richards, Charles Peloquin, Veena Venugopalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552231213883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin and is a workhorse for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a dose optimization strategy in patient populations with altered kinetics. Prior literature has demonstrated that patients with FN exhibit augmented renal clearance which may lead to subtherapeutic drug concentrations with standard dosing regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and clinical outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN who were treated empirically with cefepime.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center study of adults with hematologic malignancies and FN admitted to the inpatient unit. The primary outcome was PK/PD target attainment (defined as 100% free time greater than minimum inhibitory concentration (100% <i>f</i>T > MIC)). Secondary clinical outcomes were time to defervescence, time to ANC recovery, in-hospital mortality, and cefepime failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 55 patients in our study. Forty-three (78%) patients achieved the primary outcome of PK/PD target attainment. The mean time to defervescence was similar between those that achieved PK/PD target attainment and those that did not (95% CI -0.75 to 1.25, p = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that standard cefepime dosing in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN does not result in achievement of 100% <i>f</i>T > MIC in all patients. Patients in the group that did not achieve PK/PD target attainment were younger with increased creatinine clearance, indicating that cefepime TDM may be especially beneficial in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1207-1213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231213883\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231213883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
头孢吡肟是第四代头孢菌素,是经验性治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的主力军。β -内酰胺治疗药物监测(TDM)已成为一种剂量优化策略,在患者群体与改变动力学。先前的文献表明,FN患者表现出增强的肾脏清除率,这可能导致标准剂量方案下的亚治疗药物浓度。本研究的目的是评估经验性使用头孢吡肟治疗的血液恶性肿瘤和FN患者的药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标达到情况和临床结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性的、单中心的研究,研究对象是住院病房的成人血液恶性肿瘤和FN患者。主要终点是PK/PD目标达到(定义为100%空闲时间大于最小抑制浓度(100% fT > MIC))。次要临床结果为退热时间、ANC恢复时间、住院死亡率和头孢吡肟失效。结果:本组共55例患者。43例(78%)患者达到了主要终点PK/PD目标。达到PK/PD目标的患者与未达到目标的患者的平均退热时间相似(95% CI -0.75至1.25,p = 0.62)。结论:本研究表明,血液恶性肿瘤和FN患者的标准头孢吡肟剂量并不能使所有患者达到100%的fT > MIC。未达到PK/PD目标的患者年龄更小,肌酐清除率增加,表明头孢吡肟TDM可能对这些患者特别有益。
Utilization of cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring in febrile neutropenia patients with hematologic malignancies.
Introduction: Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin and is a workhorse for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a dose optimization strategy in patient populations with altered kinetics. Prior literature has demonstrated that patients with FN exhibit augmented renal clearance which may lead to subtherapeutic drug concentrations with standard dosing regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and clinical outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN who were treated empirically with cefepime.
Methods: This was a prospective, single-center study of adults with hematologic malignancies and FN admitted to the inpatient unit. The primary outcome was PK/PD target attainment (defined as 100% free time greater than minimum inhibitory concentration (100% fT > MIC)). Secondary clinical outcomes were time to defervescence, time to ANC recovery, in-hospital mortality, and cefepime failure.
Results: There were 55 patients in our study. Forty-three (78%) patients achieved the primary outcome of PK/PD target attainment. The mean time to defervescence was similar between those that achieved PK/PD target attainment and those that did not (95% CI -0.75 to 1.25, p = 0.62).
Conclusions: This study showed that standard cefepime dosing in patients with hematologic malignancies and FN does not result in achievement of 100% fT > MIC in all patients. Patients in the group that did not achieve PK/PD target attainment were younger with increased creatinine clearance, indicating that cefepime TDM may be especially beneficial in these patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...