心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白测定在死后尿液标本中的有效性。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1097/PAF.0000000000000891
Waka Hisamura, Shojiro Takasu, Kimiharu Iwadate
{"title":"心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白测定在死后尿液标本中的有效性。","authors":"Waka Hisamura, Shojiro Takasu, Kimiharu Iwadate","doi":"10.1097/PAF.0000000000000891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (HFABP) is a 15-kDa substance reported to pass through the renal tubules and be renally excreted. Therefore, it is possible that its concentration in the urine collected postmortem may reflect antemortem blood levels. We measured the postmortem urine concentration of HFABP in 94 forensic autopsy cases and compared it between acute myocardial infarction (AMI), sepsis, heat stroke cases, and asphyxia cases as control cases to examine its diagnostic validity. Kidney tissue collected at autopsy was immunostained with antibodies against HFABP to evaluate the correlation with the urinary measurements. Urinary HFABP was significantly higher in AMI, sepsis, and heat stroke cases than in asphyxia cases. Quantitative immunostaining results showed no significant differences between any 2 groups. The usefulness of kidney immunostaining for HFABP in elucidating the cause of death was low. Two reasons may explain the lack of significant differences in kidney immunostaining: nonspecific leakage of tubular epithelial HFABP into the tubules because of postmortem changes and oliguria due to dehydration caused by heat stroke. In conclusion, the measurement of urinary HFABP may be useful in elucidating the cause of death; however, the kidney HFABP immunostaining was not significantly different from AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":55535,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Measurement in Postmortem Urine Specimens.\",\"authors\":\"Waka Hisamura, Shojiro Takasu, Kimiharu Iwadate\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAF.0000000000000891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (HFABP) is a 15-kDa substance reported to pass through the renal tubules and be renally excreted. Therefore, it is possible that its concentration in the urine collected postmortem may reflect antemortem blood levels. We measured the postmortem urine concentration of HFABP in 94 forensic autopsy cases and compared it between acute myocardial infarction (AMI), sepsis, heat stroke cases, and asphyxia cases as control cases to examine its diagnostic validity. Kidney tissue collected at autopsy was immunostained with antibodies against HFABP to evaluate the correlation with the urinary measurements. Urinary HFABP was significantly higher in AMI, sepsis, and heat stroke cases than in asphyxia cases. Quantitative immunostaining results showed no significant differences between any 2 groups. The usefulness of kidney immunostaining for HFABP in elucidating the cause of death was low. Two reasons may explain the lack of significant differences in kidney immunostaining: nonspecific leakage of tubular epithelial HFABP into the tubules because of postmortem changes and oliguria due to dehydration caused by heat stroke. In conclusion, the measurement of urinary HFABP may be useful in elucidating the cause of death; however, the kidney HFABP immunostaining was not significantly different from AMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000891\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, HFABP)是一种15 kda的物质,据报道可通过肾小管并通过肾脏排出体外。因此,其在死后尿液中的浓度可能反映出死前血液中的浓度。我们测定了94例法医尸检患者死后尿液中HFABP的浓度,并将其与急性心肌梗死(AMI)、脓毒症、中暑和窒息作为对照进行比较,以检验其诊断的有效性。尸检时收集的肾组织用抗HFABP抗体进行免疫染色,以评估与尿液测量的相关性。AMI、脓毒症和中暑患者尿HFABP明显高于窒息患者。定量免疫染色结果显示两组间差异无统计学意义。肾免疫染色检测HFABP在确定死亡原因方面的作用很低。有两个原因可以解释肾免疫染色缺乏显著差异:死后变化导致小管上皮HFABP非特异性渗漏到小管中,以及中暑引起的脱水导致的少尿。总之,尿HFABP的测定可能有助于阐明死亡原因;肾HFABP免疫染色与AMI无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usefulness of Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Measurement in Postmortem Urine Specimens.

Abstract: Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (HFABP) is a 15-kDa substance reported to pass through the renal tubules and be renally excreted. Therefore, it is possible that its concentration in the urine collected postmortem may reflect antemortem blood levels. We measured the postmortem urine concentration of HFABP in 94 forensic autopsy cases and compared it between acute myocardial infarction (AMI), sepsis, heat stroke cases, and asphyxia cases as control cases to examine its diagnostic validity. Kidney tissue collected at autopsy was immunostained with antibodies against HFABP to evaluate the correlation with the urinary measurements. Urinary HFABP was significantly higher in AMI, sepsis, and heat stroke cases than in asphyxia cases. Quantitative immunostaining results showed no significant differences between any 2 groups. The usefulness of kidney immunostaining for HFABP in elucidating the cause of death was low. Two reasons may explain the lack of significant differences in kidney immunostaining: nonspecific leakage of tubular epithelial HFABP into the tubules because of postmortem changes and oliguria due to dehydration caused by heat stroke. In conclusion, the measurement of urinary HFABP may be useful in elucidating the cause of death; however, the kidney HFABP immunostaining was not significantly different from AMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drawing on the expertise of leading forensic pathologists, lawyers, and criminologists, The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology presents up-to-date coverage of forensic medical practices worldwide. Each issue of the journal features original articles on new examination and documentation procedures. While most articles are available as web based articles, PDF and in ePub reader format, some earlier articles do not have PDFs available. If you would like to view an article in the ePub format, you will need to download an ePub reader to view this file, a number of which are available for free online.
期刊最新文献
Incidental Finding of an Early-Stage Intrauterine Pregnancy at Autopsy. Fatal Tension Gastrothorax: Two Case Reports. Illustrated Forensic Pathology: Necklacing. Fat Embolism Fatalities Following Liposuction/Injection in Los Angeles County (2010-2018). Human Herpesvirus 6 Encephalitis: An Autopsy Case and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1