无金属聚醚醚酮膝关节假体与骨水泥金属膝关节假体结合强度的初步体外研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/10225536231217537
Dengxian Wu, Qianjin Wang, Hung-Kang Tsai, Sheng Zhou, Donggui Zheng, Qing Jiang, Zhihong Xu
{"title":"无金属聚醚醚酮膝关节假体与骨水泥金属膝关节假体结合强度的初步体外研究。","authors":"Dengxian Wu, Qianjin Wang, Hung-Kang Tsai, Sheng Zhou, Donggui Zheng, Qing Jiang, Zhihong Xu","doi":"10.1177/10225536231217537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty is the most effective treatment for advanced-stage knee arthritis, and the majority of knee prostheses are made of metal. Nevertheless, metal prostheses still have several problems. The objective of this study is to introduce new metal-free knee prostheses made of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and to compare their cement bond strength with metal prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve sets of knee prostheses were divided into four groups (unloaded PEEK, unloaded Metal, 10 million cycles (MC) PEEK, 10 MC Metal, <i>N</i> = 3 each), and then attached to composite bones using bone cement. Both the 10 MC PEEK and 10 MC Metal groups were subjected to dynamic gait simulations of 10 MC, whereas the other two sets were not. Afterwards, a pull-off strength test was performed on the femoral prostheses and a shear strength test was performed on the tibial prostheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No apparent cracks were observed in the bone cement after subjecting the PEEK and Metal groups to 10 million cycles of dynamic simulation. No statistically significant differences were observed (<i>p</i> > .05) in the strength tests for unloaded PEEK vs. unloaded Metal, 10 MC PEEK vs.10 MC Metal in the femoral pull-off test, and for unloaded PEEK vs. unloaded Metal in the tibial shear test. The shear strength of 10 MC PEEK was significantly lower (<i>p</i> < .05) compared to that of 10 MC Metal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By comparing the force analysis of previous investigations on knee prostheses with the failure pattern observed in the PEEK knee prosthesis of this study, which replicates that of the metal prosthesis. We believe that the combination of the peek knee prosthesis with bone cement is reliable. We anticipate that metal-free PEEK knee prostheses will find application in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in the future, thereby benefiting patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"31 3","pages":"10225536231217537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond strength of metal-free polyether-ether-ketone knee prostheses compared to metal knee prostheses with bone cement: A preliminary in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Dengxian Wu, Qianjin Wang, Hung-Kang Tsai, Sheng Zhou, Donggui Zheng, Qing Jiang, Zhihong Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536231217537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty is the most effective treatment for advanced-stage knee arthritis, and the majority of knee prostheses are made of metal. Nevertheless, metal prostheses still have several problems. The objective of this study is to introduce new metal-free knee prostheses made of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and to compare their cement bond strength with metal prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve sets of knee prostheses were divided into four groups (unloaded PEEK, unloaded Metal, 10 million cycles (MC) PEEK, 10 MC Metal, <i>N</i> = 3 each), and then attached to composite bones using bone cement. Both the 10 MC PEEK and 10 MC Metal groups were subjected to dynamic gait simulations of 10 MC, whereas the other two sets were not. Afterwards, a pull-off strength test was performed on the femoral prostheses and a shear strength test was performed on the tibial prostheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No apparent cracks were observed in the bone cement after subjecting the PEEK and Metal groups to 10 million cycles of dynamic simulation. No statistically significant differences were observed (<i>p</i> > .05) in the strength tests for unloaded PEEK vs. unloaded Metal, 10 MC PEEK vs.10 MC Metal in the femoral pull-off test, and for unloaded PEEK vs. unloaded Metal in the tibial shear test. The shear strength of 10 MC PEEK was significantly lower (<i>p</i> < .05) compared to that of 10 MC Metal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By comparing the force analysis of previous investigations on knee prostheses with the failure pattern observed in the PEEK knee prosthesis of this study, which replicates that of the metal prosthesis. We believe that the combination of the peek knee prosthesis with bone cement is reliable. We anticipate that metal-free PEEK knee prostheses will find application in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in the future, thereby benefiting patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"10225536231217537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231217537\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231217537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全膝关节置换术是晚期膝关节关节炎最有效的治疗方法,大多数膝关节假体是由金属制成的。然而,金属义肢仍然存在一些问题。本研究的目的是介绍由聚醚醚酮(PEEK)制成的新型无金属膝关节假体,并将其与金属假体的水泥结合强度进行比较。方法:将12套膝关节假体分为4组(未加载PEEK、未加载Metal、1000万周期(MC) PEEK、10万周期(MC) Metal,每组N = 3),采用骨水泥固定于复合骨。10 MC PEEK组和10 MC Metal组均进行了10 MC的动态步态模拟,而另外两组则不进行动态步态模拟。随后,对股骨假体进行拉脱强度试验,对胫骨假体进行剪切强度试验。结果:PEEK组和Metal组经过1000万次动态模拟后,骨水泥均未出现明显裂缝。在未装载PEEK与未装载金属、股骨牵引试验中10 MC PEEK与10 MC Metal、胫骨剪切试验中未装载PEEK与未装载金属的强度试验中,未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。与10 MC Metal相比,10 MC PEEK的抗剪强度显著降低(p < 0.05)。结论:通过比较以往研究中膝关节假体的受力分析与本研究中PEEK膝关节假体的失效模式,可以重复金属假体的失效模式。我们认为peek膝关节假体与骨水泥的结合是可靠的。我们期待无金属PEEK膝关节假体在未来的全膝关节置换术(TKA)中得到应用,从而使患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond strength of metal-free polyether-ether-ketone knee prostheses compared to metal knee prostheses with bone cement: A preliminary in vitro study.

Background: Total knee arthroplasty is the most effective treatment for advanced-stage knee arthritis, and the majority of knee prostheses are made of metal. Nevertheless, metal prostheses still have several problems. The objective of this study is to introduce new metal-free knee prostheses made of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and to compare their cement bond strength with metal prostheses.

Methods: Twelve sets of knee prostheses were divided into four groups (unloaded PEEK, unloaded Metal, 10 million cycles (MC) PEEK, 10 MC Metal, N = 3 each), and then attached to composite bones using bone cement. Both the 10 MC PEEK and 10 MC Metal groups were subjected to dynamic gait simulations of 10 MC, whereas the other two sets were not. Afterwards, a pull-off strength test was performed on the femoral prostheses and a shear strength test was performed on the tibial prostheses.

Results: No apparent cracks were observed in the bone cement after subjecting the PEEK and Metal groups to 10 million cycles of dynamic simulation. No statistically significant differences were observed (p > .05) in the strength tests for unloaded PEEK vs. unloaded Metal, 10 MC PEEK vs.10 MC Metal in the femoral pull-off test, and for unloaded PEEK vs. unloaded Metal in the tibial shear test. The shear strength of 10 MC PEEK was significantly lower (p < .05) compared to that of 10 MC Metal.

Conclusions: By comparing the force analysis of previous investigations on knee prostheses with the failure pattern observed in the PEEK knee prosthesis of this study, which replicates that of the metal prosthesis. We believe that the combination of the peek knee prosthesis with bone cement is reliable. We anticipate that metal-free PEEK knee prostheses will find application in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in the future, thereby benefiting patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Anxiety and depression as risk factors for postoperative complications and pain in lumbar spine surgery: A national database study Imaging evaluation of extraarticular posterior loose bodies in varus ankle osteoarthritis Oblique sliding ulna osteotomy to treat paediatric neglected monteggia fracture dislocation. Comparative analysis of changes in spinal dimensions following different correction methods in adult spinal deformity surgery. Letter to the editor regarding the article "knocking-down long non-coding RNA LINC01094 prohibits chondrocyte apoptosis via regulating microRNA-577/metal-regulatory transcription factor 1 axis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1