一项评估癌症患者在治疗后出现疲劳的群体干预的可行性研究

Emma Ream , Alison Richardson , Margaret Evison
{"title":"一项评估癌症患者在治疗后出现疲劳的群体干预的可行性研究","authors":"Emma Ream ,&nbsp;Alison Richardson ,&nbsp;Margaret Evison","doi":"10.1016/j.cein.2006.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a pilot multi disciplinary education and support group programme for patients with fatigue post cancer treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Mixed method feasibility study.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Programme comprised face-to-face nursing assessment followed by 3 support and information giving workshops. Workshops delivered large group support and small group discussion with therapists of participants’ choice. Therapists included a clinical psychologist, nurse, dietician, physiotherapist and occupational therapist.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Six subjects with breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The Brief Fatigue Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30. Participants completed these prior to, immediately after, and six weeks following, the programme. They also completed a programme evaluation by telephone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preliminary results indicate the programme provided information, support and management strategies for fatigue specifically, and living with cancer generally. Patients appreciated the opportunity to share their experiences whilst at the same time gaining particular help and advice for their own specific problems and concerns. Whilst not reducing the level of fatigue there was some evidence that impact on function was lessened.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Whilst the number of participants was small, findings from this study are sufficiently encouraging to warrant continuing this service development and its evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87580,"journal":{"name":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 178-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2006.08.004","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A feasibility study to evaluate a group intervention for people with cancer experiencing fatigue following treatment\",\"authors\":\"Emma Ream ,&nbsp;Alison Richardson ,&nbsp;Margaret Evison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cein.2006.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a pilot multi disciplinary education and support group programme for patients with fatigue post cancer treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Mixed method feasibility study.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Programme comprised face-to-face nursing assessment followed by 3 support and information giving workshops. Workshops delivered large group support and small group discussion with therapists of participants’ choice. Therapists included a clinical psychologist, nurse, dietician, physiotherapist and occupational therapist.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Six subjects with breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The Brief Fatigue Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30. Participants completed these prior to, immediately after, and six weeks following, the programme. They also completed a programme evaluation by telephone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preliminary results indicate the programme provided information, support and management strategies for fatigue specifically, and living with cancer generally. Patients appreciated the opportunity to share their experiences whilst at the same time gaining particular help and advice for their own specific problems and concerns. Whilst not reducing the level of fatigue there was some evidence that impact on function was lessened.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Whilst the number of participants was small, findings from this study are sufficiently encouraging to warrant continuing this service development and its evaluation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical effectiveness in nursing\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 178-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2006.08.004\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical effectiveness in nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361900406000434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361900406000434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的为癌症治疗后疲劳患者建立多学科教育和支持小组试点方案并进行评估。设计混合方法可行性研究。干预方案包括面对面护理评估,随后是3个支持和信息提供研讨会。工作坊提供大型小组支持和小型小组讨论,由参与者选择治疗师。治疗师包括临床心理学家、护士、营养师、物理治疗师和职业治疗师。参与者:6名乳腺癌患者。主要结果测量:简短疲劳量表,医院焦虑和抑郁量表,以及欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织qqc30。参与者在项目之前、之后和之后的六周完成了这些测试。他们还通过电话完成了一项方案评价。结果初步结果表明,该方案为疲劳患者提供了信息、支持和管理策略。患者很高兴有机会分享他们的经验,同时获得针对他们自己的具体问题和担忧的特殊帮助和建议。虽然没有降低疲劳程度,但有证据表明对功能的影响有所减轻。虽然参与者的数量很少,但本研究的结果足以令人鼓舞,值得继续开展这项服务并对其进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A feasibility study to evaluate a group intervention for people with cancer experiencing fatigue following treatment

Objectives

To develop and evaluate a pilot multi disciplinary education and support group programme for patients with fatigue post cancer treatment.

Design

Mixed method feasibility study.

Intervention

Programme comprised face-to-face nursing assessment followed by 3 support and information giving workshops. Workshops delivered large group support and small group discussion with therapists of participants’ choice. Therapists included a clinical psychologist, nurse, dietician, physiotherapist and occupational therapist.

Participants

Six subjects with breast cancer.

Main outcome measures

The Brief Fatigue Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30. Participants completed these prior to, immediately after, and six weeks following, the programme. They also completed a programme evaluation by telephone.

Results

Preliminary results indicate the programme provided information, support and management strategies for fatigue specifically, and living with cancer generally. Patients appreciated the opportunity to share their experiences whilst at the same time gaining particular help and advice for their own specific problems and concerns. Whilst not reducing the level of fatigue there was some evidence that impact on function was lessened.

Conclusions

Whilst the number of participants was small, findings from this study are sufficiently encouraging to warrant continuing this service development and its evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maternal psychosocial predictors of pediatric health care use: Use of the common sense model of health and illness behaviors to extend beyond the usual suspects Does excessive alcohol use in teenagers affect their everyday prospective memory? What is it like to use hip protectors? A qualitative study of the views and experiences of nurses and patients Evaluation of the nature of untoward clinical events in adult high dependency care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1