阿利沙必利在上消化道内窥镜检查中的应用。一项双盲研究对比甲氧氯普胺和安慰剂]。

A Bongiorno, M G Cataldo, A Salvia, A D'Aiuto, C Ciranni
{"title":"阿利沙必利在上消化道内窥镜检查中的应用。一项双盲研究对比甲氧氯普胺和安慰剂]。","authors":"A Bongiorno,&nbsp;M G Cataldo,&nbsp;A Salvia,&nbsp;A D'Aiuto,&nbsp;C Ciranni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to assess the antiemetic properties of alizapride in the specific context of premedication for endoscopy, a double blind test was conducted on 100 patients against both metoclopramide and a placebo. Efficacy was assessed on the basis of the following parameters: technical judgement of the endoscopist; assessment of evident signs of \"discomfort\" by an outside observer; comparative judgement (better, worse, same) of the patient's condition after the two endoscopies performed. In the case of the first two parameters, alizapride proved significantly more effective than the control substances. The patients themselves only expressed a significant preference for alizapride vis-à-vis the placebo. It is concluded that given its efficacy and the absence of side effects, alizapride is of value in premedication for endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18687,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dietologica e gastroenterologica","volume":"35 4","pages":"265-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Alizapride in upper digestive endoscopy. A double-blind study vs metoclopramide and placebo].\",\"authors\":\"A Bongiorno,&nbsp;M G Cataldo,&nbsp;A Salvia,&nbsp;A D'Aiuto,&nbsp;C Ciranni\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to assess the antiemetic properties of alizapride in the specific context of premedication for endoscopy, a double blind test was conducted on 100 patients against both metoclopramide and a placebo. Efficacy was assessed on the basis of the following parameters: technical judgement of the endoscopist; assessment of evident signs of \\\"discomfort\\\" by an outside observer; comparative judgement (better, worse, same) of the patient's condition after the two endoscopies performed. In the case of the first two parameters, alizapride proved significantly more effective than the control substances. The patients themselves only expressed a significant preference for alizapride vis-à-vis the placebo. It is concluded that given its efficacy and the absence of side effects, alizapride is of value in premedication for endoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva dietologica e gastroenterologica\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"265-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva dietologica e gastroenterologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dietologica e gastroenterologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估阿利沙必利在内窥镜前用药的特殊情况下的止吐特性,对100名服用甲氧氯普胺和安慰剂的患者进行了双盲试验。根据以下参数评估疗效:内窥镜医师的技术判断;由外部观察者对明显的“不适”迹象进行评估;两种内镜检查后患者病情的比较判断(较好、较差、相同)。在前两个参数的情况下,阿利沙必利被证明比对照物质明显更有效。与-à-vis安慰剂相比,患者本身只表现出对阿利沙比利的显著偏好。结论阿利沙必利疗效好,无不良反应,在内镜检查前用药中具有一定的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Alizapride in upper digestive endoscopy. A double-blind study vs metoclopramide and placebo].

In order to assess the antiemetic properties of alizapride in the specific context of premedication for endoscopy, a double blind test was conducted on 100 patients against both metoclopramide and a placebo. Efficacy was assessed on the basis of the following parameters: technical judgement of the endoscopist; assessment of evident signs of "discomfort" by an outside observer; comparative judgement (better, worse, same) of the patient's condition after the two endoscopies performed. In the case of the first two parameters, alizapride proved significantly more effective than the control substances. The patients themselves only expressed a significant preference for alizapride vis-à-vis the placebo. It is concluded that given its efficacy and the absence of side effects, alizapride is of value in premedication for endoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Preparation of the colon for endoscopic examinations. A clinical study]. [Migration and peptic ulcer]. [Antipyrine clearance in liver resections]. [Emergency endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage]. [Prevention of duodenal ulcer recurrence by the use of anti H2. Comparison of continuous long-term and seasonal therapy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1