横波弹性成像前斜角肌刚度测量的可重复性:一项检查者间可靠性研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS Ultraschall in Der Medizin Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2217-3795
Umut Varol, Elena Sánchez-Jiménez, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Gustavo Plaza-Manzano, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Marcos José Navarro-Santana, Sandra Sanchez-Jorge, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago
{"title":"横波弹性成像前斜角肌刚度测量的可重复性:一项检查者间可靠性研究。","authors":"Umut Varol, Elena Sánchez-Jiménez, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Gustavo Plaza-Manzano, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Marcos José Navarro-Santana, Sandra Sanchez-Jorge, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago","doi":"10.1055/a-2217-3795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although previous studies have highlighted the clinical relevance of the anterior scalene muscle (AS) in patients with neck pain or nerve compressive syndromes, evidence reporting the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing the AS stiffness properties is lacking. This study aimed to analyze the SWE inter-examiner reliability for calculating the Young's modulus and shear wave speed of the AS muscle in asymptomatic subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using a linear transducer, ultrasound images of the antero-lateral neck region at the C7 level were acquired in 35 healthy volunteers by one experienced examiner and one novice examiner. After codifying the images to blind the participants' identity, the trial, and the side, Young's modulus and shear wave speed were obtained by an independent experienced rater in randomized order. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable changes (MDC), and coefficient of variation (CV%) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The assessed AS metrics showed no side-to-side differences (p>0.05). Sex differences were found for muscle size (p=0.002), but muscle brightness and stiffness were similar (p>0.05). Inter-examiner reliability was good for determining the AS muscle stiffness (ICC = 0.881 for Young's modulus and 0.850 for shear wave speed).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The obtained results suggest that assessing the AS stiffness properties in asymptomatic subjects is a reliable procedure. Further studies should verify the SWE capacity for discriminating healthy and clinical populations and identify potential factors contributing to the variance of measurement errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of Anterior Scalene Stiffness Measurement with Shear Wave Elastography: An Inter-Examiner Reliability Study.\",\"authors\":\"Umut Varol, Elena Sánchez-Jiménez, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Gustavo Plaza-Manzano, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Marcos José Navarro-Santana, Sandra Sanchez-Jorge, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2217-3795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although previous studies have highlighted the clinical relevance of the anterior scalene muscle (AS) in patients with neck pain or nerve compressive syndromes, evidence reporting the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing the AS stiffness properties is lacking. This study aimed to analyze the SWE inter-examiner reliability for calculating the Young's modulus and shear wave speed of the AS muscle in asymptomatic subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using a linear transducer, ultrasound images of the antero-lateral neck region at the C7 level were acquired in 35 healthy volunteers by one experienced examiner and one novice examiner. After codifying the images to blind the participants' identity, the trial, and the side, Young's modulus and shear wave speed were obtained by an independent experienced rater in randomized order. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable changes (MDC), and coefficient of variation (CV%) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The assessed AS metrics showed no side-to-side differences (p>0.05). Sex differences were found for muscle size (p=0.002), but muscle brightness and stiffness were similar (p>0.05). Inter-examiner reliability was good for determining the AS muscle stiffness (ICC = 0.881 for Young's modulus and 0.850 for shear wave speed).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The obtained results suggest that assessing the AS stiffness properties in asymptomatic subjects is a reliable procedure. Further studies should verify the SWE capacity for discriminating healthy and clinical populations and identify potential factors contributing to the variance of measurement errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultraschall in Der Medizin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultraschall in Der Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2217-3795\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2217-3795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管先前的研究强调了前斜角肌(AS)在颈痛或神经压迫综合征患者中的临床相关性,但缺乏证据报告剪切波弹性成像(SWE)用于评估AS刚度特性的诊断准确性。本研究旨在分析SWE在计算无症状AS肌肉杨氏模量和横波速度时的可靠性。材料和方法:使用线性换能器,由一名经验丰富的检查员和一名新检查员获得35名健康志愿者C7水平前外侧颈部的超声图像。在对图像进行编码,使参与者身份、试验和侧面盲化后,由独立的经验评分器按随机顺序获得杨氏模量和横波速度。计算类内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和变异系数(CV%)。结果:AS指标评估无侧侧差异(p>0.05)。肌肉大小存在性别差异(p=0.002),但肌肉亮度和僵硬度相似(p>0.05)。在测定AS肌肉刚度时,检查者间信度良好(杨氏模量的ICC = 0.881,横波速度的ICC = 0.850)。结论:所得结果表明,评估无症状受试者的AS刚度特性是一种可靠的方法。进一步的研究应该验证SWE区分健康人群和临床人群的能力,并确定导致测量误差差异的潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reproducibility of Anterior Scalene Stiffness Measurement with Shear Wave Elastography: An Inter-Examiner Reliability Study.

Purpose: Although previous studies have highlighted the clinical relevance of the anterior scalene muscle (AS) in patients with neck pain or nerve compressive syndromes, evidence reporting the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing the AS stiffness properties is lacking. This study aimed to analyze the SWE inter-examiner reliability for calculating the Young's modulus and shear wave speed of the AS muscle in asymptomatic subjects.

Materials and methods: Using a linear transducer, ultrasound images of the antero-lateral neck region at the C7 level were acquired in 35 healthy volunteers by one experienced examiner and one novice examiner. After codifying the images to blind the participants' identity, the trial, and the side, Young's modulus and shear wave speed were obtained by an independent experienced rater in randomized order. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable changes (MDC), and coefficient of variation (CV%) were calculated.

Results: The assessed AS metrics showed no side-to-side differences (p>0.05). Sex differences were found for muscle size (p=0.002), but muscle brightness and stiffness were similar (p>0.05). Inter-examiner reliability was good for determining the AS muscle stiffness (ICC = 0.881 for Young's modulus and 0.850 for shear wave speed).

Conclusion: The obtained results suggest that assessing the AS stiffness properties in asymptomatic subjects is a reliable procedure. Further studies should verify the SWE capacity for discriminating healthy and clinical populations and identify potential factors contributing to the variance of measurement errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
期刊最新文献
The impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on ventricular catheter placement in cerebrospinal fluid shunts - a single-center study. The reliability and validity of superb microvascular imaging as a potential disease activity marker in rheumatoid arthritis. Fetal cardiovascular function in a late-onset SGA and FGR cohort: CURIOSA study. Risk-based ultrasound probe quality assurance - a single center proof-of-concept study. Evaluation of placenta and fetal lung using shear wave elastography in gestational diabetes mellitus: An innovative approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1