FindDNAFusion:多种软件工具的分析管道提高了基因组DNA中癌症相关基因融合的检测。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Molecular Diagnostics Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.11.004
Xiaokang Pan , Huolin Tu , Nehad Mohamed , Matthew Avenarius , Sean Caruthers , Weiqiang Zhao , Dan Jones
{"title":"FindDNAFusion:多种软件工具的分析管道提高了基因组DNA中癌症相关基因融合的检测。","authors":"Xiaokang Pan ,&nbsp;Huolin Tu ,&nbsp;Nehad Mohamed ,&nbsp;Matthew Avenarius ,&nbsp;Sean Caruthers ,&nbsp;Weiqiang Zhao ,&nbsp;Dan Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Detection of cancer-associated gene fusions is crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection. Many bioinformatics tools are available for the detection of fusion transcripts by RNA sequencing, but there are fewer well-validated software tools for DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS). A 542-gene solid tumor NGS panel was designed, with exonic probes supplemented with intronic bait probes against genes commonly involved in oncogenic fusions, with a focus on lung cancer. Three software tools for the detecting gene fusions in this DNA-NGS panel were selected and evaluated. The performance of these tools was compared after a pilot study, and each was configured for optimal batch analysis and detection rate. A blacklist for filtering common tool-specific artifacts, and criteria for selecting clinically reportable fusions, were established. Visualization tools for annotating and confirming somatic fusions were applied. Subsequently, a full clinical validation was used for comparing the results to those from <em>in situ</em> hybridization and/or RNA sequencing. With JuLI, Factera, and GeneFuse, 94.1%, 88.2%, and 66.7% of expected fusions were detected, respectively. With a combinatorial pipeline (termed FindDNAFusion), developed by integrating fusion-calling tools with methods for fusion filtering, annotating, and flagging reportable calls, the accuracy of detection of intron-tiled genes was improved to 98.0%. FindDNAFusion is an accurate and efficient tool in detecting somatic fusions in DNA-NGS panels with intron-tiled bait probes when RNA is unavailable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002751/pdfft?md5=7ffc0cf0a98d4d83957d178b88b5c556&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157823002751-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FindDNAFusion\",\"authors\":\"Xiaokang Pan ,&nbsp;Huolin Tu ,&nbsp;Nehad Mohamed ,&nbsp;Matthew Avenarius ,&nbsp;Sean Caruthers ,&nbsp;Weiqiang Zhao ,&nbsp;Dan Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Detection of cancer-associated gene fusions is crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection. Many bioinformatics tools are available for the detection of fusion transcripts by RNA sequencing, but there are fewer well-validated software tools for DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS). A 542-gene solid tumor NGS panel was designed, with exonic probes supplemented with intronic bait probes against genes commonly involved in oncogenic fusions, with a focus on lung cancer. Three software tools for the detecting gene fusions in this DNA-NGS panel were selected and evaluated. The performance of these tools was compared after a pilot study, and each was configured for optimal batch analysis and detection rate. A blacklist for filtering common tool-specific artifacts, and criteria for selecting clinically reportable fusions, were established. Visualization tools for annotating and confirming somatic fusions were applied. Subsequently, a full clinical validation was used for comparing the results to those from <em>in situ</em> hybridization and/or RNA sequencing. With JuLI, Factera, and GeneFuse, 94.1%, 88.2%, and 66.7% of expected fusions were detected, respectively. With a combinatorial pipeline (termed FindDNAFusion), developed by integrating fusion-calling tools with methods for fusion filtering, annotating, and flagging reportable calls, the accuracy of detection of intron-tiled genes was improved to 98.0%. FindDNAFusion is an accurate and efficient tool in detecting somatic fusions in DNA-NGS panels with intron-tiled bait probes when RNA is unavailable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002751/pdfft?md5=7ffc0cf0a98d4d83957d178b88b5c556&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157823002751-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002751\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

检测癌症相关基因融合对诊断、预后和治疗选择至关重要。许多生物信息学工具可用于通过RNA测序(RNAseq)检测融合转录物,但用于DNA下一代测序(NGS)的软件工具较少。利用外显子探针和内含子诱饵探针,设计了一个542个基因的实体肿瘤NGS面板,针对肺癌中常见的致癌融合基因。选择并评估了用于检测该DNA-NGS面板中基因融合的三种软件工具。在初步研究后,对这些工具的性能进行了比较,并对每个工具进行了优化配置,以进行批量分析并提高检测率。建立了用于过滤常见工具特定伪影的黑名单和选择临床可报告融合的标准。应用可视化工具对体细胞融合进行注释和确认。随后,将结果与原位杂交和/或RNAseq进行全面的临床验证。JuLI、FACTERA和GeneFuse分别检测到94.1%、88.3%和62.7%的预期融合。通过将融合呼叫工具与融合过滤、注释和标记可报告呼叫的方法相结合,开发了一个组合管道(称为FindDNAFusion),将内含子贴片基因的检测准确率提高到98.0%。FindDNAFusion可以作为一种准确和有效的工具,用于检测DNA-NGS面板中内含子贴片诱饵探针在RNA不可用时的体细胞融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FindDNAFusion

Detection of cancer-associated gene fusions is crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection. Many bioinformatics tools are available for the detection of fusion transcripts by RNA sequencing, but there are fewer well-validated software tools for DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS). A 542-gene solid tumor NGS panel was designed, with exonic probes supplemented with intronic bait probes against genes commonly involved in oncogenic fusions, with a focus on lung cancer. Three software tools for the detecting gene fusions in this DNA-NGS panel were selected and evaluated. The performance of these tools was compared after a pilot study, and each was configured for optimal batch analysis and detection rate. A blacklist for filtering common tool-specific artifacts, and criteria for selecting clinically reportable fusions, were established. Visualization tools for annotating and confirming somatic fusions were applied. Subsequently, a full clinical validation was used for comparing the results to those from in situ hybridization and/or RNA sequencing. With JuLI, Factera, and GeneFuse, 94.1%, 88.2%, and 66.7% of expected fusions were detected, respectively. With a combinatorial pipeline (termed FindDNAFusion), developed by integrating fusion-calling tools with methods for fusion filtering, annotating, and flagging reportable calls, the accuracy of detection of intron-tiled genes was improved to 98.0%. FindDNAFusion is an accurate and efficient tool in detecting somatic fusions in DNA-NGS panels with intron-tiled bait probes when RNA is unavailable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents 25 Years of Publishing The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics Navigating the Flood The Era of Molecular Hematopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1