扩展倒置课堂中“学会学习”:互动教学对医学生知识认知调节的影响

Luis Carlos Domínguez , Claudia Marcela Mora , Jorge Alberto Restrepo
{"title":"扩展倒置课堂中“学会学习”:互动教学对医学生知识认知调节的影响","authors":"Luis Carlos Domínguez ,&nbsp;Claudia Marcela Mora ,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Restrepo","doi":"10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The evidence regarding the effects of the Inverted Classroom on students' metacognitive skills is limited. This study evaluates these effects on student perceptions about knowledge and cognitive regulation during a surgical course.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We measured student perceptions before and after a conventional Inverted Classroom in surgery using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. We evaluated the mean differences between the scores of the two measurements using Student’s </span><em>t</em>-test (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), and the size of the effect on knowledge and cognitive regulation using Cohen’s <em>d</em> test (95%CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 158 students (pre-intervention) and 155 students (post-intervention) were included in the analysis. Significant differences were found (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in, as well as positive effects on, the students’ abilities to know their own learning (declarative knowledge) (<em>d</em> = 0.24; 95%CI, 0.02−0.47), to use learning strategies (procedural knowledge) (<em>d</em> = 0.19; 95%CI, –0.02 to 0.41) and to understand when and why to use these strategies (conditional knowledge) (<em>d</em> = 0.20; 95%CI, –0.01 to 0.42), in addition to the abilities to plan (<em>d</em> = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.09−0.53) and to evaluate their learning (<em>d</em> = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.08−0.53).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Inverted Classroom has positive effects on metacognitive skills according to students’ perceptions. Further studies are required that compare these effects with other methodologies for teaching in the classroom and the workplace.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74702,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Learning to learn” in the Extended Inverted Classroom: An evaluation of the effects of interactive teaching on knowledge and cognitive regulation in medical students\",\"authors\":\"Luis Carlos Domínguez ,&nbsp;Claudia Marcela Mora ,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Restrepo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The evidence regarding the effects of the Inverted Classroom on students' metacognitive skills is limited. This study evaluates these effects on student perceptions about knowledge and cognitive regulation during a surgical course.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We measured student perceptions before and after a conventional Inverted Classroom in surgery using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. We evaluated the mean differences between the scores of the two measurements using Student’s </span><em>t</em>-test (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), and the size of the effect on knowledge and cognitive regulation using Cohen’s <em>d</em> test (95%CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 158 students (pre-intervention) and 155 students (post-intervention) were included in the analysis. Significant differences were found (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in, as well as positive effects on, the students’ abilities to know their own learning (declarative knowledge) (<em>d</em> = 0.24; 95%CI, 0.02−0.47), to use learning strategies (procedural knowledge) (<em>d</em> = 0.19; 95%CI, –0.02 to 0.41) and to understand when and why to use these strategies (conditional knowledge) (<em>d</em> = 0.20; 95%CI, –0.01 to 0.42), in addition to the abilities to plan (<em>d</em> = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.09−0.53) and to evaluate their learning (<em>d</em> = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.08−0.53).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Inverted Classroom has positive effects on metacognitive skills according to students’ perceptions. Further studies are required that compare these effects with other methodologies for teaching in the classroom and the workplace.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530312023000759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530312023000759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:关于翻转课堂对学生元认知技能影响的证据是有限的。本研究评估了这些对学生在外科课程中对知识和认知调节的感知的影响。方法:采用元认知意识量表测量学生在常规翻转课堂手术前后的认知。我们使用学生t检验(p )评估两项测量得分的平均差异。结果:共有158名学生(干预前)和155名学生(干预后)被纳入分析。结论:倒置课堂对学生的元认知技能有正向影响。需要进一步的研究将这些效果与课堂和工作场所的其他教学方法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Learning to learn” in the Extended Inverted Classroom: An evaluation of the effects of interactive teaching on knowledge and cognitive regulation in medical students

Introduction

The evidence regarding the effects of the Inverted Classroom on students' metacognitive skills is limited. This study evaluates these effects on student perceptions about knowledge and cognitive regulation during a surgical course.

Methods

We measured student perceptions before and after a conventional Inverted Classroom in surgery using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. We evaluated the mean differences between the scores of the two measurements using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05), and the size of the effect on knowledge and cognitive regulation using Cohen’s d test (95%CI).

Results

A total of 158 students (pre-intervention) and 155 students (post-intervention) were included in the analysis. Significant differences were found (p < 0.05) in, as well as positive effects on, the students’ abilities to know their own learning (declarative knowledge) (d = 0.24; 95%CI, 0.02−0.47), to use learning strategies (procedural knowledge) (d = 0.19; 95%CI, –0.02 to 0.41) and to understand when and why to use these strategies (conditional knowledge) (d = 0.20; 95%CI, –0.01 to 0.42), in addition to the abilities to plan (d = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.09−0.53) and to evaluate their learning (d = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.08−0.53).

Conclusions

The Inverted Classroom has positive effects on metacognitive skills according to students’ perceptions. Further studies are required that compare these effects with other methodologies for teaching in the classroom and the workplace.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to psychopharmacological treatment in patients with severe and persistent mental disorders: A systematic review Assessing skills in psychiatry. Experience and implementation of OSCE for medical students Association between cognitive impairment and socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors in Colombian older adults Successful treatment for serious depression with suicidal risk in a heart transplant patient Telerehabilitation of subjects with neurodevelopmental disorders during confinement due to COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1