HIV风险人群暴露前预防护理连续性:系统评价和荟萃分析的总括性回顾。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES AIDS patient care and STDs Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1089/apc.2023.0158
Guifang Jin, Haiyan Shi, Jun Du, Haiyun Guo, Guojing Yuan, Huayu Yang, Zhihui Zhu, Jianghui Zhang, Kexin Zhang, Xueqing Zhang, Xiaoyan Lu, Wenzhuo Xu, Sainan Wang, Jiahu Hao, Ying Sun, Puyu Su, Zhihua Zhang
{"title":"HIV风险人群暴露前预防护理连续性:系统评价和荟萃分析的总括性回顾。","authors":"Guifang Jin, Haiyan Shi, Jun Du, Haiyun Guo, Guojing Yuan, Huayu Yang, Zhihui Zhu, Jianghui Zhang, Kexin Zhang, Xueqing Zhang, Xiaoyan Lu, Wenzhuo Xu, Sainan Wang, Jiahu Hao, Ying Sun, Puyu Su, Zhihua Zhang","doi":"10.1089/apc.2023.0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical strategy for HIV prevention. This umbrella review is aimed at providing a comprehensive summary of the current status of each stage of the PrEP care cascade. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Additionally, a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist were used to evaluate their methodological and reporting quality, respectively. A total of 30 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. According to the results of methodological quality assessment, 3 reviews were rated as low, while 27 as critically low. Furthermore, the results of the reporting quality evaluation revealed a mean score of 23.03 for the included reviews. Across all the reviews, awareness of PrEP was generally moderate in all populations, and the acceptability was even higher compared with awareness. Unfortunately, the PrEP uptake among different groups was even less optimal, although the adherence was almost above moderate, and several barriers that hindered the utilization of PrEP were identified, and the most common are as follows: cost, stigma, lack of knowledge, mistrust, low risk perception, and more. Although PrEP has proven to be an effective prevention method to date, the promotion of PrEP failed to achieve the anticipated outcome. To reinforce the generalization of and use of PrEP, and effectively control HIV transmission, it is urgent to identify the underlying causes of low uptake rates so that efficient interventions can be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":7476,"journal":{"name":"AIDS patient care and STDs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum for HIV Risk Populations: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Guifang Jin, Haiyan Shi, Jun Du, Haiyun Guo, Guojing Yuan, Huayu Yang, Zhihui Zhu, Jianghui Zhang, Kexin Zhang, Xueqing Zhang, Xiaoyan Lu, Wenzhuo Xu, Sainan Wang, Jiahu Hao, Ying Sun, Puyu Su, Zhihua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apc.2023.0158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical strategy for HIV prevention. This umbrella review is aimed at providing a comprehensive summary of the current status of each stage of the PrEP care cascade. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Additionally, a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist were used to evaluate their methodological and reporting quality, respectively. A total of 30 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. According to the results of methodological quality assessment, 3 reviews were rated as low, while 27 as critically low. Furthermore, the results of the reporting quality evaluation revealed a mean score of 23.03 for the included reviews. Across all the reviews, awareness of PrEP was generally moderate in all populations, and the acceptability was even higher compared with awareness. Unfortunately, the PrEP uptake among different groups was even less optimal, although the adherence was almost above moderate, and several barriers that hindered the utilization of PrEP were identified, and the most common are as follows: cost, stigma, lack of knowledge, mistrust, low risk perception, and more. Although PrEP has proven to be an effective prevention method to date, the promotion of PrEP failed to achieve the anticipated outcome. To reinforce the generalization of and use of PrEP, and effectively control HIV transmission, it is urgent to identify the underlying causes of low uptake rates so that efficient interventions can be implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2023.0158\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS patient care and STDs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2023.0158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴露前预防(PrEP)是一种有效的预防艾滋病毒的生物医学策略。这一总括性审查旨在全面总结PrEP护理级联各阶段的现状。在PubMed, Embase和Cochrane中进行了系统的文献检索。此外,评估系统评价2的测量工具(AMSTAR-2)工具和系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)检查表分别用于评估其方法和报告质量。共有30项系统评价符合纳入标准。方法学质量评价结果显示,低评价3篇,极低评价27篇。此外,报告质量评价结果显示,纳入评价的平均得分为23.03分。在所有的综述中,所有人群对PrEP的认识总体上是中等的,与认识相比,可接受性甚至更高。不幸的是,尽管依从性几乎在中等以上,但不同群体对PrEP的吸收甚至更不理想,并且确定了阻碍PrEP利用的几个障碍,最常见的是:成本,耻辱,缺乏知识,不信任,低风险认知等等。尽管迄今为止PrEP已被证明是一种有效的预防方法,但推广PrEP未能取得预期的结果。为了加强PrEP的推广和使用,并有效控制艾滋病毒的传播,迫切需要确定使用率低的根本原因,以便实施有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum for HIV Risk Populations: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical strategy for HIV prevention. This umbrella review is aimed at providing a comprehensive summary of the current status of each stage of the PrEP care cascade. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Additionally, a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist were used to evaluate their methodological and reporting quality, respectively. A total of 30 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. According to the results of methodological quality assessment, 3 reviews were rated as low, while 27 as critically low. Furthermore, the results of the reporting quality evaluation revealed a mean score of 23.03 for the included reviews. Across all the reviews, awareness of PrEP was generally moderate in all populations, and the acceptability was even higher compared with awareness. Unfortunately, the PrEP uptake among different groups was even less optimal, although the adherence was almost above moderate, and several barriers that hindered the utilization of PrEP were identified, and the most common are as follows: cost, stigma, lack of knowledge, mistrust, low risk perception, and more. Although PrEP has proven to be an effective prevention method to date, the promotion of PrEP failed to achieve the anticipated outcome. To reinforce the generalization of and use of PrEP, and effectively control HIV transmission, it is urgent to identify the underlying causes of low uptake rates so that efficient interventions can be implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS patient care and STDs
AIDS patient care and STDs 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
22.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Patient Care and STDs is the foremost journal providing the latest developments and research in diagnostics and therapeutics designed to prolong the lifespan and improve quality of life for HIV/AIDS patients. The Journal delivers cutting-edge clinical, basic science, sociologic, and behavior-based investigations in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. Clinical trials, quantitative and qualitative analyses of pilot studies, comprehensive reviews, and case reports are presented from leading experts and scientists around the world. AIDS Patient Care and STDs coverage includes: Prominent AIDS medications, therapies, and antiretroviral agents HIV/AIDS-related diseases, infections, and complications Challenges of medication adherence Current prevention techniques for HIV The latest news and developments on other STDs Treatment/prevention options, including pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis
期刊最新文献
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV-1: An Assessment of Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Usage Patterns, First Evidence of HIV-1, and HIV-1 Risk Factors in the United States. Prevalence, Monitoring, Treatment, and Control of Type 2 Diabetes by Race and Sexual Orientation Among Males with HIV. Acceptability and Feasibility of Implementing a Home-Based HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Program in an Urban Clinic. A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of the Motivational Interviewing to Increase PrEP Uptake Intervention Among Black Women in the United States. Identifying Motivators, Facilitators, and Barriers to Engagement and Retention in Anal Cancer Screening Among Men and Women with HIV in One Ryan White HIV/AIDS Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1