考试预测和全科执业注册师能力评估网格(GPR-CAG)。

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Education for Primary Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1080/14739879.2023.2269884
Katie Fisher, Alison Fielding, Anna Ralston, Elizabeth Holliday, Jean Ball, Michael Tran, Andrew Davey, Amanda Tapley, Parker Magin
{"title":"考试预测和全科执业注册师能力评估网格(GPR-CAG)。","authors":"Katie Fisher, Alison Fielding, Anna Ralston, Elizabeth Holliday, Jean Ball, Michael Tran, Andrew Davey, Amanda Tapley, Parker Magin","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2023.2269884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In GP training, identifying early predictors of poor summative examination performance can be challenging. We aimed to establish whether external clinical teaching visit (ECTV) performance, measured using a validated instrument (GP Registrar Competency Assessment Grid, GPR-CAG) is predictive of Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Fellowship examination performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study including GP registrars in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory with ECTV data recorded during their first training term (GPT1), between 2014 and 2018, who attempted at least one Fellowship examination. Independent variables of interest included the four GPR-CAG factors assessed in GPT1 ('patient-centredness/caring', 'formulating hypotheses/management plans', 'professional responsibilities', 'physical examination skills'). Outcomes of interest included individual scores of the three summative examinations (Applied Knowledge Test (AKT); Key Feature Problem (KFP); and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)) and overall Pass/Fail status. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariably, there were statistically significant associations (<i>p</i> < 0.01) between all four GPR-CAG factors and all four summative examination outcomes, except for 'formulating hypotheses/management plans' and OSCE score (<i>p</i> = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, each factor was significantly associated (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with at least one exam outcome, and 'physical examination skills' was significantly associated (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with all four exam outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ECTV performance, via GPR-CAG scores, is predictive of RACGP Fellowship exam performance. The univariable findings highlight the pragmatic utility of ECTVs in flagging registrars who are at-risk of poor exam performance, facilitating early intervention. The multivariable associations of GPR-CAG scores and examination performance suggest that these scores provide predictive ability beyond that of other known predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exam prediction and the general Practice Registrar Competency Assessment Grid (GPR-CAG).\",\"authors\":\"Katie Fisher, Alison Fielding, Anna Ralston, Elizabeth Holliday, Jean Ball, Michael Tran, Andrew Davey, Amanda Tapley, Parker Magin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14739879.2023.2269884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In GP training, identifying early predictors of poor summative examination performance can be challenging. We aimed to establish whether external clinical teaching visit (ECTV) performance, measured using a validated instrument (GP Registrar Competency Assessment Grid, GPR-CAG) is predictive of Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Fellowship examination performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study including GP registrars in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory with ECTV data recorded during their first training term (GPT1), between 2014 and 2018, who attempted at least one Fellowship examination. Independent variables of interest included the four GPR-CAG factors assessed in GPT1 ('patient-centredness/caring', 'formulating hypotheses/management plans', 'professional responsibilities', 'physical examination skills'). Outcomes of interest included individual scores of the three summative examinations (Applied Knowledge Test (AKT); Key Feature Problem (KFP); and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)) and overall Pass/Fail status. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariably, there were statistically significant associations (<i>p</i> < 0.01) between all four GPR-CAG factors and all four summative examination outcomes, except for 'formulating hypotheses/management plans' and OSCE score (<i>p</i> = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, each factor was significantly associated (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with at least one exam outcome, and 'physical examination skills' was significantly associated (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with all four exam outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ECTV performance, via GPR-CAG scores, is predictive of RACGP Fellowship exam performance. The univariable findings highlight the pragmatic utility of ECTVs in flagging registrars who are at-risk of poor exam performance, facilitating early intervention. The multivariable associations of GPR-CAG scores and examination performance suggest that these scores provide predictive ability beyond that of other known predictors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2023.2269884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2023.2269884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在全科医生培训中,识别总结考试成绩不佳的早期预测因素可能具有挑战性。我们的目的是确定外部临床教学访问(ECTV)的表现是否可以预测澳大利亚皇家全科医师学院(RACGP)奖学金考试的表现,使用一种经过验证的仪器(GP注册师能力评估网格,GPR-CAG)进行测量。方法:一项回顾性队列研究,包括新南威尔士州/澳大利亚首都地区的全科医生注册者,他们在2014年至2018年的第一个培训学期(GPT1)期间记录了ECTV数据,这些注册者至少参加过一次奖学金考试。感兴趣的独立变量包括GPT1中评估的四个GPR-CAG因素(“以患者为中心/关怀”,“制定假设/管理计划”,“专业责任”,“体检技能”)。结果包括三项总结性考试(应用知识测试(AKT))的个人分数;关键特征问题(KFP);客观结构化临床检查(OSCE))和总体合格/不合格状态。进行单变量和多变量回归分析。结果:单变量相关性有统计学意义(p p = 0.07)。在多变量分析中,每个因素都显著相关(p p)讨论:通过GPR-CAG评分,ECTV表现可以预测RACGP奖学金考试成绩。单变量研究结果强调了ectv在标记有考试表现不佳风险的注册者方面的实用效用,促进了早期干预。GPR-CAG分数与考试成绩的多变量关联表明,这些分数提供了比其他已知预测因子更强的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exam prediction and the general Practice Registrar Competency Assessment Grid (GPR-CAG).

Background: In GP training, identifying early predictors of poor summative examination performance can be challenging. We aimed to establish whether external clinical teaching visit (ECTV) performance, measured using a validated instrument (GP Registrar Competency Assessment Grid, GPR-CAG) is predictive of Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Fellowship examination performance.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study including GP registrars in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory with ECTV data recorded during their first training term (GPT1), between 2014 and 2018, who attempted at least one Fellowship examination. Independent variables of interest included the four GPR-CAG factors assessed in GPT1 ('patient-centredness/caring', 'formulating hypotheses/management plans', 'professional responsibilities', 'physical examination skills'). Outcomes of interest included individual scores of the three summative examinations (Applied Knowledge Test (AKT); Key Feature Problem (KFP); and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)) and overall Pass/Fail status. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

Results: Univariably, there were statistically significant associations (p < 0.01) between all four GPR-CAG factors and all four summative examination outcomes, except for 'formulating hypotheses/management plans' and OSCE score (p = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, each factor was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with at least one exam outcome, and 'physical examination skills' was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with all four exam outcomes.

Discussion: ECTV performance, via GPR-CAG scores, is predictive of RACGP Fellowship exam performance. The univariable findings highlight the pragmatic utility of ECTVs in flagging registrars who are at-risk of poor exam performance, facilitating early intervention. The multivariable associations of GPR-CAG scores and examination performance suggest that these scores provide predictive ability beyond that of other known predictors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
期刊最新文献
Lessons learned from the experiences of patients with long-term conditions: recommendations for enhancing the undergraduate medical curriculum. Consequences of career progression barriers experienced by doctors in GP training: an interpretative phenomenological study. Beyond accountability and Learner Agency: a call for a comprehensive approach to portfolio management. What about us?: a call to include oral health professions within interprofessional education for collaborative practice. What can we learn from pandemic educational methods?: military general practice trainees' attitudes to feedback from recorded consultations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1