复杂性阑尾炎的术前诊断与处理综述。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-11-23
Binyamin Sikander, Kristoffer Andresen, Hagar Al Fartoussi, Niklas Nygaard Baastrup, Camilla Kjelkvist-Born, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes
{"title":"复杂性阑尾炎的术前诊断与处理综述。","authors":"Binyamin Sikander, Kristoffer Andresen, Hagar Al Fartoussi, Niklas Nygaard Baastrup, Camilla Kjelkvist-Born, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complicated appendicitis is a severe condition, requiring early diagnosis and intervention to prevent complications. We aimed to investigate how resident surgeons distinguish and manage complicated appendicitis and their perspectives on preoperative diagnostic markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic survey was face validated. It contained questions about demographics, resident surgeons' considerations on the preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, and views on the need for and relevance of preoperative diagnostic markers. It was sent to all resident surgeons in the Eastern part of Denmark.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hospitals and their 92 resident surgeons received the survey, and 90% responded. Most resident surgeons used symptoms and signs of pain to diagnose suspected complicated appendicitis. Half of the surgeons used computed tomographies, and 95% used routine blood tests. Most surgeons (83%) would change the management of patients with preoperatively diagnosed complicated appendicitis in comparison to uncomplicated appendicitis. However, only 17% felt the need for a preoperative diagnostic marker.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resident surgeons in Eastern Denmark use non-specific diagnostic techniques to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis and would change treatment if appendicitis was diagnosed preoperatively. However, despite limited interest, our results suggest a need for new diagnostic markers to differentiate between the severity of appendicitis, thus enhancing education and training in managing such cases.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of preoperative diagnosis and management of complicated appendicitis.\",\"authors\":\"Binyamin Sikander, Kristoffer Andresen, Hagar Al Fartoussi, Niklas Nygaard Baastrup, Camilla Kjelkvist-Born, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complicated appendicitis is a severe condition, requiring early diagnosis and intervention to prevent complications. We aimed to investigate how resident surgeons distinguish and manage complicated appendicitis and their perspectives on preoperative diagnostic markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic survey was face validated. It contained questions about demographics, resident surgeons' considerations on the preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, and views on the need for and relevance of preoperative diagnostic markers. It was sent to all resident surgeons in the Eastern part of Denmark.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hospitals and their 92 resident surgeons received the survey, and 90% responded. Most resident surgeons used symptoms and signs of pain to diagnose suspected complicated appendicitis. Half of the surgeons used computed tomographies, and 95% used routine blood tests. Most surgeons (83%) would change the management of patients with preoperatively diagnosed complicated appendicitis in comparison to uncomplicated appendicitis. However, only 17% felt the need for a preoperative diagnostic marker.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resident surgeons in Eastern Denmark use non-specific diagnostic techniques to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis and would change treatment if appendicitis was diagnosed preoperatively. However, despite limited interest, our results suggest a need for new diagnostic markers to differentiate between the severity of appendicitis, thus enhancing education and training in managing such cases.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"volume\":\"70 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复杂性阑尾炎是一种严重的疾病,需要早期诊断和干预,以防止并发症的发生。我们的目的是探讨住院医师如何区分和处理复杂的阑尾炎,以及他们对术前诊断标记的看法。方法:对电子调查进行人脸验证。问卷内容包括人口统计学、住院医师对复杂性阑尾炎术前诊断的考虑、术前诊断标志物的必要性和相关性。它被发送给丹麦东部的所有住院外科医生。结果:7家医院92名住院医师接受调查,回复率90%。大多数住院医师使用疼痛的症状和体征来诊断疑似复杂阑尾炎。一半的外科医生使用计算机断层扫描,95%的外科医生使用常规血液检查。大多数外科医生(83%)会改变术前诊断为复杂阑尾炎的患者的治疗方法,而不是非复杂阑尾炎。然而,只有17%的人认为需要术前诊断标记。结论:丹麦东部的住院医师使用非特异性诊断技术来区分复杂和非复杂的阑尾炎,如果术前诊断为阑尾炎,将改变治疗方法。然而,尽管兴趣有限,我们的结果表明需要新的诊断标记来区分阑尾炎的严重程度,从而加强管理这类病例的教育和培训。资金:没有。试验注册:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey of preoperative diagnosis and management of complicated appendicitis.

Introduction: Complicated appendicitis is a severe condition, requiring early diagnosis and intervention to prevent complications. We aimed to investigate how resident surgeons distinguish and manage complicated appendicitis and their perspectives on preoperative diagnostic markers.

Methods: The electronic survey was face validated. It contained questions about demographics, resident surgeons' considerations on the preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, and views on the need for and relevance of preoperative diagnostic markers. It was sent to all resident surgeons in the Eastern part of Denmark.

Results: Seven hospitals and their 92 resident surgeons received the survey, and 90% responded. Most resident surgeons used symptoms and signs of pain to diagnose suspected complicated appendicitis. Half of the surgeons used computed tomographies, and 95% used routine blood tests. Most surgeons (83%) would change the management of patients with preoperatively diagnosed complicated appendicitis in comparison to uncomplicated appendicitis. However, only 17% felt the need for a preoperative diagnostic marker.

Conclusions: Resident surgeons in Eastern Denmark use non-specific diagnostic techniques to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis and would change treatment if appendicitis was diagnosed preoperatively. However, despite limited interest, our results suggest a need for new diagnostic markers to differentiate between the severity of appendicitis, thus enhancing education and training in managing such cases.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Compliance with endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors. Counselling and prescription of contraception related to pregnancy termination. Adrenomedullin in pulmonary hypertension. A novel acute basic palliation concept for patients without specialised palliative needs. Adjuvant steroid to percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren's contracture. An RCT study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1