Andre G. Gouveia , Gustavo A. Viani , Vanessa F. Bratti , Gustavo N. Marta , Samir A. Hanna , Alexandre A. Jacinto , Mauricio S. Silva , Ana C. Hamamura , Arthur A. Rosa , Marcus S. Castilho , Laura Carson , Wilma M. Hopman , Richard Sullivan , Christopher M. Booth , Ajay Aggarwal , Timothy P. Hanna , Fabio Y. Moraes
{"title":"建立放射治疗能力的挑战:一项评估巴西放射治疗扩展计划8年的纵向研究。","authors":"Andre G. Gouveia , Gustavo A. Viani , Vanessa F. Bratti , Gustavo N. Marta , Samir A. Hanna , Alexandre A. Jacinto , Mauricio S. Silva , Ana C. Hamamura , Arthur A. Rosa , Marcus S. Castilho , Laura Carson , Wilma M. Hopman , Richard Sullivan , Christopher M. Booth , Ajay Aggarwal , Timothy P. Hanna , Fabio Y. Moraes","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In 2012, the Brazilian government launched a radiotherapy (RT) expansion plan (PER-SUS) to install 100 linear accelerators. This study assesses the development of this program after eight years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Official reports from the Ministry of Health (MoH) were reviewed. RT centres projects status, timeframes, and cost data (all converted to US dollars) were extracted. The time analysis was divided into seven phases, and for cost evaluation, there were five stages. The initial predicted project time (IPPT) and costs (estimated by the MoH) for each phase were compared between the 18 operational RT centres (able to treat patients) and 30 non-operational RT centres using t-tests, ANOVA, and the Mann-Whitney U. A p-value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant delay was observed when comparing the IPPT with the overall time to conclude each 48 RT centres project (p < 0.001), with considerable delays in the first five phases (p < 0.001 for all). Moreover, the median time to conclude the first 18 operational RT centres (77.4 months) was shorter compared with the 30 non-operational RT centres (94.0 months), p < 0.001. The total cost of 48 RT services was USD 82,84 millions (mi) with a significant difference in the per project median total cost between 18 operational RT centres, USD1,34 mi and 30 non-operational RT centres USD2,11 mi, p < 0.001. All phases had a higher cost when comparing 30 non-operational RT centres to 18 operational RT centres, p < 0.001. The median total cost for expanding existing RT centres was USD1,30 mi versus USD2,18 mi for new RT services, p < 0.0001.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>After eight years, the PER-SUS programs showed a substantial delay in most projects and their phases, with increased costs over time.</p></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><p>Our findings indicate a need to act to increase the success of this plan. This study may provide a benchmark for other developing countries trying to expand RT capacity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in building radiotherapy capacity: A longitudinal study evaluating eight years of the Brazilian radiotherapy expansion plan\",\"authors\":\"Andre G. Gouveia , Gustavo A. Viani , Vanessa F. Bratti , Gustavo N. Marta , Samir A. Hanna , Alexandre A. Jacinto , Mauricio S. Silva , Ana C. Hamamura , Arthur A. Rosa , Marcus S. Castilho , Laura Carson , Wilma M. Hopman , Richard Sullivan , Christopher M. Booth , Ajay Aggarwal , Timothy P. Hanna , Fabio Y. Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In 2012, the Brazilian government launched a radiotherapy (RT) expansion plan (PER-SUS) to install 100 linear accelerators. This study assesses the development of this program after eight years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Official reports from the Ministry of Health (MoH) were reviewed. RT centres projects status, timeframes, and cost data (all converted to US dollars) were extracted. The time analysis was divided into seven phases, and for cost evaluation, there were five stages. The initial predicted project time (IPPT) and costs (estimated by the MoH) for each phase were compared between the 18 operational RT centres (able to treat patients) and 30 non-operational RT centres using t-tests, ANOVA, and the Mann-Whitney U. A p-value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant delay was observed when comparing the IPPT with the overall time to conclude each 48 RT centres project (p < 0.001), with considerable delays in the first five phases (p < 0.001 for all). Moreover, the median time to conclude the first 18 operational RT centres (77.4 months) was shorter compared with the 30 non-operational RT centres (94.0 months), p < 0.001. The total cost of 48 RT services was USD 82,84 millions (mi) with a significant difference in the per project median total cost between 18 operational RT centres, USD1,34 mi and 30 non-operational RT centres USD2,11 mi, p < 0.001. All phases had a higher cost when comparing 30 non-operational RT centres to 18 operational RT centres, p < 0.001. The median total cost for expanding existing RT centres was USD1,30 mi versus USD2,18 mi for new RT services, p < 0.0001.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>After eight years, the PER-SUS programs showed a substantial delay in most projects and their phases, with increased costs over time.</p></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><p>Our findings indicate a need to act to increase the success of this plan. This study may provide a benchmark for other developing countries trying to expand RT capacity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:2012年,巴西政府启动了一项放疗(RT)扩展计划(PER-SUS),计划安装100台直线加速器。本研究评估了该项目八年后的发展情况。方法:查阅卫生部官方报告。提取RT中心、项目状态、时间框架和成本数据(全部转换为美元)。时间分析分为7个阶段,成本评估分为5个阶段。每个阶段的初始预测项目时间(IPPT)和成本(由卫生部估计)在18个手术RT中心(能够治疗患者)和30个非手术RT中心之间进行比较,使用t检验,方差分析和Mann-Whitney U. A p值结果:当比较IPPT与完成每48个RT中心项目的总时间时,观察到显着延迟(pConclusion:8年后,PER-SUS项目显示出大多数项目及其阶段的实质性延迟,成本随着时间的推移而增加。政策摘要:我们的研究结果表明,需要采取行动以提高该计划的成功率。这项研究可能为其他发展中国家扩大RT能力提供一个基准。
Challenges in building radiotherapy capacity: A longitudinal study evaluating eight years of the Brazilian radiotherapy expansion plan
Background
In 2012, the Brazilian government launched a radiotherapy (RT) expansion plan (PER-SUS) to install 100 linear accelerators. This study assesses the development of this program after eight years.
Methods
Official reports from the Ministry of Health (MoH) were reviewed. RT centres projects status, timeframes, and cost data (all converted to US dollars) were extracted. The time analysis was divided into seven phases, and for cost evaluation, there were five stages. The initial predicted project time (IPPT) and costs (estimated by the MoH) for each phase were compared between the 18 operational RT centres (able to treat patients) and 30 non-operational RT centres using t-tests, ANOVA, and the Mann-Whitney U. A p-value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Results
A significant delay was observed when comparing the IPPT with the overall time to conclude each 48 RT centres project (p < 0.001), with considerable delays in the first five phases (p < 0.001 for all). Moreover, the median time to conclude the first 18 operational RT centres (77.4 months) was shorter compared with the 30 non-operational RT centres (94.0 months), p < 0.001. The total cost of 48 RT services was USD 82,84 millions (mi) with a significant difference in the per project median total cost between 18 operational RT centres, USD1,34 mi and 30 non-operational RT centres USD2,11 mi, p < 0.001. All phases had a higher cost when comparing 30 non-operational RT centres to 18 operational RT centres, p < 0.001. The median total cost for expanding existing RT centres was USD1,30 mi versus USD2,18 mi for new RT services, p < 0.0001.
Conclusion
After eight years, the PER-SUS programs showed a substantial delay in most projects and their phases, with increased costs over time.
Policy summary
Our findings indicate a need to act to increase the success of this plan. This study may provide a benchmark for other developing countries trying to expand RT capacity.