澳大利亚公共卫生系统集中效率改进实践分析。

IF 3.4 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2023-11-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S435035
James Kenneth Walters, Anurag Sharma, Jamie Boyce, Reema Harrison
{"title":"澳大利亚公共卫生系统集中效率改进实践分析。","authors":"James Kenneth Walters, Anurag Sharma, Jamie Boyce, Reema Harrison","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S435035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Analysis of centralized efficiency improvement practices in Australian public health systems.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public health systems seek to maximize outcomes generated for resources used through efficiency improvement (EI) in response to funding and demand pressures. Despite this focus, evidence for EI approaches at the whole-of-system level is lacking in the literature. There is an urgent need for evidence-based approaches to centralized EI to address these pressures. This study aims to address this gap by answering the research question \"How is EI conceptualized and managed by central public health system management entities in Australia?\".</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Document analysis was selected due to its suitability for systematically searching and appraising health system documentation, with this study following Altheide's approach focusing on whole-of-system strategic plan and management framework documents originating from Australian public health organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conceptualization of efficiency varied substantially with no consistent definition identified, however common attributes included resource use, management, service and delivery. Forty-two of 43 documents contained approaches associated with improving efficiency at the whole of system level.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While no comprehensive framework for centralized EI was evident, we identified nine core approaches which together characterize centralized EI. Together these approaches represent a comprehensive evidence-based approach to EI at the whole of system level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The approaches to whole-of-system EI identified in this study are likely to be highly transferable across health systems internationally with approaches including strategic priority setting, incentivization, performance support, use of EI evidence, digital enablement and workforce capability development.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":"15 ","pages":"313-326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Centralized Efficiency Improvement Practices in Australian Public Health Systems.\",\"authors\":\"James Kenneth Walters, Anurag Sharma, Jamie Boyce, Reema Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JHL.S435035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Analysis of centralized efficiency improvement practices in Australian public health systems.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public health systems seek to maximize outcomes generated for resources used through efficiency improvement (EI) in response to funding and demand pressures. Despite this focus, evidence for EI approaches at the whole-of-system level is lacking in the literature. There is an urgent need for evidence-based approaches to centralized EI to address these pressures. This study aims to address this gap by answering the research question \\\"How is EI conceptualized and managed by central public health system management entities in Australia?\\\".</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Document analysis was selected due to its suitability for systematically searching and appraising health system documentation, with this study following Altheide's approach focusing on whole-of-system strategic plan and management framework documents originating from Australian public health organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conceptualization of efficiency varied substantially with no consistent definition identified, however common attributes included resource use, management, service and delivery. Forty-two of 43 documents contained approaches associated with improving efficiency at the whole of system level.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While no comprehensive framework for centralized EI was evident, we identified nine core approaches which together characterize centralized EI. Together these approaches represent a comprehensive evidence-based approach to EI at the whole of system level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The approaches to whole-of-system EI identified in this study are likely to be highly transferable across health systems internationally with approaches including strategic priority setting, incentivization, performance support, use of EI evidence, digital enablement and workforce capability development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Leadership\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"313-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S435035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S435035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析澳大利亚公共卫生系统集中效率改进实践。简介:公共卫生系统寻求通过提高效率(EI)来最大限度地利用资源,以应对资金和需求压力。尽管如此,文献中缺乏证据表明EI方法在整个系统水平上是有效的。迫切需要以证据为基础的集中EI方法来应对这些压力。本研究旨在通过回答研究问题“EI是如何被澳大利亚中央公共卫生系统管理实体概念化和管理的?”来解决这一差距。材料和方法:选择文献分析是因为它适合系统地搜索和评价卫生系统文件,本研究遵循Altheide的方法,重点研究来自澳大利亚公共卫生组织的全系统战略计划和管理框架文件。结果:效率的概念差异很大,没有一致的定义,但共同的属性包括资源利用、管理、服务和交付。43份文件中有42份载有在整个系统一级提高效率的办法。讨论:虽然集中式EI没有明确的综合框架,但我们确定了九种核心方法,它们共同表征了集中式EI。这些方法共同代表了一种在整个系统层面上全面的基于证据的EI方法。结论:本研究确定的全系统EI方法可能在国际卫生系统之间具有高度可转移性,包括战略重点设定、激励、绩效支持、EI证据的使用、数字化支持和劳动力能力发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Centralized Efficiency Improvement Practices in Australian Public Health Systems.

Aim: Analysis of centralized efficiency improvement practices in Australian public health systems.

Introduction: Public health systems seek to maximize outcomes generated for resources used through efficiency improvement (EI) in response to funding and demand pressures. Despite this focus, evidence for EI approaches at the whole-of-system level is lacking in the literature. There is an urgent need for evidence-based approaches to centralized EI to address these pressures. This study aims to address this gap by answering the research question "How is EI conceptualized and managed by central public health system management entities in Australia?".

Material and methods: Document analysis was selected due to its suitability for systematically searching and appraising health system documentation, with this study following Altheide's approach focusing on whole-of-system strategic plan and management framework documents originating from Australian public health organizations.

Results: Conceptualization of efficiency varied substantially with no consistent definition identified, however common attributes included resource use, management, service and delivery. Forty-two of 43 documents contained approaches associated with improving efficiency at the whole of system level.

Discussion: While no comprehensive framework for centralized EI was evident, we identified nine core approaches which together characterize centralized EI. Together these approaches represent a comprehensive evidence-based approach to EI at the whole of system level.

Conclusion: The approaches to whole-of-system EI identified in this study are likely to be highly transferable across health systems internationally with approaches including strategic priority setting, incentivization, performance support, use of EI evidence, digital enablement and workforce capability development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
期刊最新文献
Value Co-Creation in Telemedicine: A Qualitative Study of Pediatricians' Expectations Regarding Telehomecare Implementation in an Italian Pediatric Hospital. Professionalism and Self-Evaluation: Diverging Perspectives Among Physicians and Nurses. Organizational Factors Driving the Realization of Digital Health Transformation Benefits from Health Service Managers: A Qualitative Study. Barriers to Recruitment and Retention Among Underrepresented Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Clinical Trial Research Coordinating Staff at a Cancer Center. Empowering Leadership: A Journey of Growth and Insight Through a Mentoring Program for Nurses in Leadership Positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1