血液培养中多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌的流行及多重PCR快速检测β -内酰胺酶编码基因。

IF 1.7 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES GERMS Pub Date : 2022-12-31 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.18683/germs.2022.1349
Sanja Zornic, Bojana Lukovic, Ivana Petrovic, Aleksandra Jencic
{"title":"血液培养中多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌的流行及多重PCR快速检测β -内酰胺酶编码基因。","authors":"Sanja Zornic, Bojana Lukovic, Ivana Petrovic, Aleksandra Jencic","doi":"10.18683/germs.2022.1349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from blood cultures in a tertiary-care hospital and the multiplex PCR assay's ability to detect resistance genes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 388 GNB isolates obtained from hospitalized patients between November 2019 and November 2021 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by VITEK 2 system and broth microdilution method. Beta-lactamase-encoding genes were detected by multiplex PCR assays, BioFire-Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel (bioMérieux, France). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) were detected phenotypically with VITEK AST-GN71 card (bioMérieux, France). The isolates of GNB were classified into multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant categories, and their prevalence and distribution in different wards, including coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) intensive care units (ICU), were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that all isolates of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> were multidrug-resistant as well as 91.6% of <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i>, 80.6% of <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>, and 76.1% of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, respectively. In fermentative bacteria, <i>bla</i><sub>OXA-48-like</sub> (58.1%), <i>bla</i><sub>NDM</sub> (16.1%), <i>bla</i><sub>KPC</sub> (9.7%) and <i>bla</i><sub>VIM</sub> (6.5%) genes were detected. More than half of <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> (58.3%) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (53.7%) produced ESBLs. Among non-fermenters, the <i>bla</i><sub>NDM</sub> gene was carried by 55% of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and 19.5% of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>. In the COVID-19 ICU, <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> was the most common isolate (86.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed high proportions of multidrug-resistant blood isolates and various underlying resistance genes in Gram-negative strains. The BCID2 panel seems to be helpful for the detection of the most prevalent resistance genes of fermentative bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":45107,"journal":{"name":"GERMS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from blood cultures and rapid detection of beta-lactamase-encoding genes by multiplex PCR assay.\",\"authors\":\"Sanja Zornic, Bojana Lukovic, Ivana Petrovic, Aleksandra Jencic\",\"doi\":\"10.18683/germs.2022.1349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from blood cultures in a tertiary-care hospital and the multiplex PCR assay's ability to detect resistance genes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 388 GNB isolates obtained from hospitalized patients between November 2019 and November 2021 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by VITEK 2 system and broth microdilution method. Beta-lactamase-encoding genes were detected by multiplex PCR assays, BioFire-Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel (bioMérieux, France). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) were detected phenotypically with VITEK AST-GN71 card (bioMérieux, France). The isolates of GNB were classified into multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant categories, and their prevalence and distribution in different wards, including coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) intensive care units (ICU), were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that all isolates of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> were multidrug-resistant as well as 91.6% of <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i>, 80.6% of <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>, and 76.1% of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, respectively. In fermentative bacteria, <i>bla</i><sub>OXA-48-like</sub> (58.1%), <i>bla</i><sub>NDM</sub> (16.1%), <i>bla</i><sub>KPC</sub> (9.7%) and <i>bla</i><sub>VIM</sub> (6.5%) genes were detected. More than half of <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> (58.3%) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (53.7%) produced ESBLs. Among non-fermenters, the <i>bla</i><sub>NDM</sub> gene was carried by 55% of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and 19.5% of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>. In the COVID-19 ICU, <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> was the most common isolate (86.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed high proportions of multidrug-resistant blood isolates and various underlying resistance genes in Gram-negative strains. The BCID2 panel seems to be helpful for the detection of the most prevalent resistance genes of fermentative bacteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERMS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660225/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2022.1349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2022.1349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定三级医院血液培养物中多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)的流行情况,以及多重PCR检测耐药基因的能力。方法:纳入2019年11月至2021年11月住院患者中分离到的388株GNB。采用VITEK 2系统和微量肉汤稀释法进行药敏试验。β -内酰胺酶编码基因在BioFire-Blood Culture Identification 2 (bid2) panel (biomacrieux, France)上进行多重PCR检测。广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBLs)用VITEK AST-GN71卡(biomacrieux, France)进行表型检测。将GNB分离株分为多重耐药、广泛耐药和大耐药三类,并计算其在包括2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)重症监护病房(ICU)在内的不同病房的流行和分布情况。结果:鲍曼不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌均耐多药,阴沟肠杆菌、奇迹变形杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的耐多药率分别为91.6%、80.6%和76.1%。发酵菌中检测到blaoxa -48样(58.1%)、blaNDM(16.1%)、blaKPC(9.7%)和blaVIM(6.5%)基因。超过一半的阴沟肠杆菌(58.3%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(53.7%)产生ESBLs。在非发酵菌中,55%的铜绿假单胞菌和19.5%的鲍曼不动杆菌携带blaNDM基因。在COVID-19 ICU中,鲍曼不动杆菌是最常见的分离物(86.1%)。结论:本研究揭示了革兰氏阴性菌株中高比例的多药耐药血分离株和多种潜在耐药基因。bbcid2小组似乎有助于检测最普遍的耐药基因的发酵细菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from blood cultures and rapid detection of beta-lactamase-encoding genes by multiplex PCR assay.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from blood cultures in a tertiary-care hospital and the multiplex PCR assay's ability to detect resistance genes.

Methods: A total of 388 GNB isolates obtained from hospitalized patients between November 2019 and November 2021 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by VITEK 2 system and broth microdilution method. Beta-lactamase-encoding genes were detected by multiplex PCR assays, BioFire-Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel (bioMérieux, France). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) were detected phenotypically with VITEK AST-GN71 card (bioMérieux, France). The isolates of GNB were classified into multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant categories, and their prevalence and distribution in different wards, including coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) intensive care units (ICU), were calculated.

Results: Results revealed that all isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were multidrug-resistant as well as 91.6% of Enterobacter cloacae, 80.6% of Proteus mirabilis, and 76.1% of Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively. In fermentative bacteria, blaOXA-48-like (58.1%), blaNDM (16.1%), blaKPC (9.7%) and blaVIM (6.5%) genes were detected. More than half of Enterobacter cloacae (58.3%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (53.7%) produced ESBLs. Among non-fermenters, the blaNDM gene was carried by 55% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 19.5% of Acinetobacter baumannii. In the COVID-19 ICU, Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common isolate (86.1%).

Conclusions: This study revealed high proportions of multidrug-resistant blood isolates and various underlying resistance genes in Gram-negative strains. The BCID2 panel seems to be helpful for the detection of the most prevalent resistance genes of fermentative bacteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERMS
GERMS INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans endocarditis in an adult patient with patent ductus arteriosus. Clinical spectrum of extrapulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease in immunocompetent patients: a case series. Clinical, epidemiological and molecular aspects of patients with mpox in Romania. Continuous versus intermittent infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics: where do we stand today? A narrative review. Infective endocarditis by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria - a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1