头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦对产esbls的大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌抗菌活性的全球评价:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2023-11-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361231212074
Marzieh Rahim Khorasani, Soodabeh Rostami, Arash Bakhshi, Raheleh Sheikhi
{"title":"头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦对产esbls的大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌抗菌活性的全球评价:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Marzieh Rahim Khorasani, Soodabeh Rostami, Arash Bakhshi, Raheleh Sheikhi","doi":"10.1177/20499361231212074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceftolozane/Tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a high range of efficacy and broad-spectrum action against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to analyze the <i>in vitro</i> activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (ESBLs-EC) and <i>Klebsiella pneumonia</i> (ESBLs-KP) in the published literature to provide international data on the antimicrobial stewardship programs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases from the beginning of databases to December 2022 to cover all published articles relevant to our scope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At last, 31 publications that met our inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The pooled prevalence of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam susceptibility for ESBLs-EC and ESBLs-KP was estimated at 91.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 90.1-92.5%] and 65.6% (95% CI: 60.8-70.2%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity among the 31 studies for ESBLs-EC (χ<sup>2</sup> = 91.621; <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 67.256%) and ESBLs-KP (χ<sup>2</sup> = 348.72; <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 91.4%). Most clinical isolates of ESBLs-EC had MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> at a concentration of 0.5 and 2 µg/mL [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited], respectively. In contrast, most clinical isolates of ESBLs-KP had MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> at a concentration of 1 and 32 µg/mL, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the meta-analysis results, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam has a more promising <i>in vitro</i> antibacterial activity against ESBLs-EC isolates from different clinical sources than ESBLs-KP isolates. Therefore, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam can be a useful therapeutic drug as an alternative to carbapenems. Randomized clinical trials are needed to provide clinical evidence to support these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"10 ","pages":"20499361231212074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against ESBLs-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marzieh Rahim Khorasani, Soodabeh Rostami, Arash Bakhshi, Raheleh Sheikhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20499361231212074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceftolozane/Tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a high range of efficacy and broad-spectrum action against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to analyze the <i>in vitro</i> activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (ESBLs-EC) and <i>Klebsiella pneumonia</i> (ESBLs-KP) in the published literature to provide international data on the antimicrobial stewardship programs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases from the beginning of databases to December 2022 to cover all published articles relevant to our scope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At last, 31 publications that met our inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The pooled prevalence of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam susceptibility for ESBLs-EC and ESBLs-KP was estimated at 91.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 90.1-92.5%] and 65.6% (95% CI: 60.8-70.2%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity among the 31 studies for ESBLs-EC (χ<sup>2</sup> = 91.621; <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 67.256%) and ESBLs-KP (χ<sup>2</sup> = 348.72; <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 91.4%). Most clinical isolates of ESBLs-EC had MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> at a concentration of 0.5 and 2 µg/mL [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited], respectively. In contrast, most clinical isolates of ESBLs-KP had MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> at a concentration of 1 and 32 µg/mL, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the meta-analysis results, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam has a more promising <i>in vitro</i> antibacterial activity against ESBLs-EC isolates from different clinical sources than ESBLs-KP isolates. Therefore, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam can be a useful therapeutic drug as an alternative to carbapenems. Randomized clinical trials are needed to provide clinical evidence to support these observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"20499361231212074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361231212074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361231212074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:头孢洛桑/他唑巴坦是一种联合β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂,对多药耐药菌株具有高效域和广谱作用。目的:本研究旨在分析头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦对广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)产生的大肠杆菌(ESBLs- ec)和肺炎克雷伯菌(ESBLs- kp)的体外活性,为抗菌药物管理计划提供国际数据。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:系统检索Web of Science、Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Google Scholar等电子数据库自建库之初至2022年12月的所有与我们研究范围相关的已发表文章。结果:最终选取符合纳入标准的31篇文献,通过综合meta分析软件进行数据提取和分析。ESBLs-EC和ESBLs-KP对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦的总易感率估计分别为91.3%[95%置信区间(CI): 90.1-92.5%]和65.6% (95% CI: 60.8-70.2%)。31项ESBLs-EC研究间存在显著异质性(χ2 = 91.621;p 2 = 67.256%)和ESBLs-KP (χ2 = 348.72;p I2 = 91.4%)。大多数ESBLs-EC临床分离株在0.5µg/mL和2µg/mL[最低抑制浓度(MIC), 50%和90%的分离株被抑制]时的MIC50和MIC90分别为。相比之下,大多数ESBLs-KP临床分离株的MIC50和MIC90浓度分别为1和32µg/mL。结论:综合meta分析结果,头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦对不同临床来源的ESBLs-EC菌株的体外抗菌活性均优于ESBLs-KP菌株。因此,头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦可以作为碳青霉烯类的一种有用的替代治疗药物。需要随机临床试验来提供临床证据来支持这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against ESBLs-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Ceftolozane/Tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a high range of efficacy and broad-spectrum action against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.

Objectives: The present study aimed to analyze the in vitro activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs-EC) and Klebsiella pneumonia (ESBLs-KP) in the published literature to provide international data on the antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases from the beginning of databases to December 2022 to cover all published articles relevant to our scope.

Results: At last, 31 publications that met our inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The pooled prevalence of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam susceptibility for ESBLs-EC and ESBLs-KP was estimated at 91.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 90.1-92.5%] and 65.6% (95% CI: 60.8-70.2%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity among the 31 studies for ESBLs-EC (χ2 = 91.621; p < 0.001; I2 = 67.256%) and ESBLs-KP (χ2 = 348.72; p < 0.001; I2 = 91.4%). Most clinical isolates of ESBLs-EC had MIC50 and MIC90 at a concentration of 0.5 and 2 µg/mL [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited], respectively. In contrast, most clinical isolates of ESBLs-KP had MIC50 and MIC90 at a concentration of 1 and 32 µg/mL, respectively.

Conclusion: Based on the meta-analysis results, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam has a more promising in vitro antibacterial activity against ESBLs-EC isolates from different clinical sources than ESBLs-KP isolates. Therefore, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam can be a useful therapeutic drug as an alternative to carbapenems. Randomized clinical trials are needed to provide clinical evidence to support these observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social disparities on PrEP use and awareness among sexual and gender minorities using smartphones in India. Challenges in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. braziliensis in four travelers: a case series. Fungal Infections, Treatment and Antifungal Resistance: The Sub-Saharan African Context. Polio: Background and perspective on how international travel can be made safe against polio. Emerging trends in fungal endocarditis: clinical complexity, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic implications - a case series and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1