阿巴拉契亚地区人群的社会心理因素、自我保健和血糖的关系。

Brittany L Smalls, Tofial Azam, Madeline Dunfee, Philip M Westgate, Susan C Westneat, Nancy Schoenberg
{"title":"阿巴拉契亚地区人群的社会心理因素、自我保健和血糖的关系。","authors":"Brittany L Smalls, Tofial Azam, Madeline Dunfee, Philip M Westgate, Susan C Westneat, Nancy Schoenberg","doi":"10.13023/jah.0403.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appalachian residents are more likely than other populations to have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and to experience more severe complications from the disease, including excess and premature mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examines health alongside sociodemographic factors, psychosocial factors (including knowledge, empowerment, social support/function, religiosity, distress), and perceived problems in diabetes management that may influence self-care and HbA1c among vulnerable rural residents. A survey of a community-based sample of 356 adults with diagnosed diabetes or HbA1c > 6.5 was conducted in six counties in Appalachian Kentucky.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings suggest that neither religiosity nor social support/function mediate/moderate the relationship between psychosocial factors and dependent variables (problem areas in diabetes, T2DM self-care or HbA1c). Results also suggest that distress is a predictor of problem areas in diabetes, and both distress and empowerment are predictors of T2DM self-care.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study addresses the gap in the literature concerning the influence of psychosocial factors on problem areas in diabetes, T2DM self-care and HbA1c among vulnerable rural residents, as well as the potential mediating/modifying effects of religiosity and social function/support. Future research is needed to inform strategies for identifying and addressing distress among vulnerable populations burdened by T2DM, including Appalachian adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"4 3","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655736/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between psychosocial factors, self-care, and blood sugar in an Appalachian population.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany L Smalls, Tofial Azam, Madeline Dunfee, Philip M Westgate, Susan C Westneat, Nancy Schoenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.13023/jah.0403.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appalachian residents are more likely than other populations to have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and to experience more severe complications from the disease, including excess and premature mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examines health alongside sociodemographic factors, psychosocial factors (including knowledge, empowerment, social support/function, religiosity, distress), and perceived problems in diabetes management that may influence self-care and HbA1c among vulnerable rural residents. A survey of a community-based sample of 356 adults with diagnosed diabetes or HbA1c > 6.5 was conducted in six counties in Appalachian Kentucky.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings suggest that neither religiosity nor social support/function mediate/moderate the relationship between psychosocial factors and dependent variables (problem areas in diabetes, T2DM self-care or HbA1c). Results also suggest that distress is a predictor of problem areas in diabetes, and both distress and empowerment are predictors of T2DM self-care.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study addresses the gap in the literature concerning the influence of psychosocial factors on problem areas in diabetes, T2DM self-care and HbA1c among vulnerable rural residents, as well as the potential mediating/modifying effects of religiosity and social function/support. Future research is needed to inform strategies for identifying and addressing distress among vulnerable populations burdened by T2DM, including Appalachian adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Appalachian health\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Appalachian health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0403.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0403.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

阿巴拉契亚居民比其他人群更容易患2型糖尿病(T2DM),并经历更严重的并发症,包括过量和过早死亡。方法:本研究考察了健康、社会人口因素、心理社会因素(包括知识、赋权、社会支持/功能、宗教信仰、痛苦)以及糖尿病管理中可能影响自我保健和糖化血红蛋白的感知问题。在肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚州的六个县,对356名诊断为糖尿病或HbA1c > 6.5的成年人进行了社区抽样调查。结果:研究结果表明,无论是宗教信仰还是社会支持/功能,都不能调解/调节社会心理因素和因变量(糖尿病问题领域、T2DM自我保健或HbA1c)之间的关系。结果还表明,痛苦是糖尿病问题区域的预测因子,痛苦和赋权都是T2DM自我护理的预测因子。意义:本研究填补了社会心理因素对农村弱势群体糖尿病、2型糖尿病自我保健和糖化血红蛋白问题区影响的文献空白,以及宗教信仰和社会功能/支持的潜在中介/调节作用。未来的研究需要为识别和解决包括阿巴拉契亚成年人在内的易受2型糖尿病影响人群的痛苦提供策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between psychosocial factors, self-care, and blood sugar in an Appalachian population.

Introduction: Appalachian residents are more likely than other populations to have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and to experience more severe complications from the disease, including excess and premature mortality.

Methods: This study examines health alongside sociodemographic factors, psychosocial factors (including knowledge, empowerment, social support/function, religiosity, distress), and perceived problems in diabetes management that may influence self-care and HbA1c among vulnerable rural residents. A survey of a community-based sample of 356 adults with diagnosed diabetes or HbA1c > 6.5 was conducted in six counties in Appalachian Kentucky.

Results: Findings suggest that neither religiosity nor social support/function mediate/moderate the relationship between psychosocial factors and dependent variables (problem areas in diabetes, T2DM self-care or HbA1c). Results also suggest that distress is a predictor of problem areas in diabetes, and both distress and empowerment are predictors of T2DM self-care.

Implications: This study addresses the gap in the literature concerning the influence of psychosocial factors on problem areas in diabetes, T2DM self-care and HbA1c among vulnerable rural residents, as well as the potential mediating/modifying effects of religiosity and social function/support. Future research is needed to inform strategies for identifying and addressing distress among vulnerable populations burdened by T2DM, including Appalachian adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Chronic Pain Among Adults Diagnosed with Diabetes Residing in Rural Appalachia. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intimate Partner Violence and Child Maltreatment Services in Rural Northwest North Carolina. Nutrition Education Needs and Barriers of Uninsured Clients who Utilize Free Clinics in Western North Carolina. Aftermath: A Word to Appalachia Following Hurricane Helene. Psychosocial Factors, Stress and Sleep Among Rural Appalachian Kentucky Residents with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1