{"title":"转移造口对直肠癌患者长期生存的影响:一项基于健康保险索赔数据的全国性研究","authors":"Nobuaki Hoshino , Koya Hida , Yudai Fukui , Yoshimitsu Takahashi , Takeo Nakayama , Kazutaka Obama","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A diverting stoma is often created to prevent anastomotic leakage when a low anterior resection (LAR) is performed for rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear how a diverting stoma impacts the prognosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified patients with rectal cancer in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan who underwent LAR in 2014 and received adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months of surgery. Overall survival was compared according to the presence or absence of a diverting stoma. Only patients with a stoma were selected to compare overall survival according to the timing of stoma closure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with a diverting stoma had a significantly better prognosis than those without a diverting stoma (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.99, <em>P</em> = 0.039). Compared with patients with early closure, the prognosis of patients with late closure was significantly better (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.95, <em>P</em> = 0.031) and that of patients without stoma closure was significantly poorer (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34–3.64, <em>P</em> = 0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, those who had a diverting stoma had better prognosis than those who did not. Patients with a diverting stoma who underwent late closure had the best prognosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000223/pdfft?md5=2cb2b9b3a9f749bae1e0af83a2c747c4&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X23000223-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of diverting stoma on long-term survival in patients with rectal cancer: A nationwide study based on health insurance claims data\",\"authors\":\"Nobuaki Hoshino , Koya Hida , Yudai Fukui , Yoshimitsu Takahashi , Takeo Nakayama , Kazutaka Obama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A diverting stoma is often created to prevent anastomotic leakage when a low anterior resection (LAR) is performed for rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear how a diverting stoma impacts the prognosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified patients with rectal cancer in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan who underwent LAR in 2014 and received adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months of surgery. Overall survival was compared according to the presence or absence of a diverting stoma. Only patients with a stoma were selected to compare overall survival according to the timing of stoma closure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with a diverting stoma had a significantly better prognosis than those without a diverting stoma (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.99, <em>P</em> = 0.039). Compared with patients with early closure, the prognosis of patients with late closure was significantly better (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.95, <em>P</em> = 0.031) and that of patients without stoma closure was significantly poorer (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34–3.64, <em>P</em> = 0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, those who had a diverting stoma had better prognosis than those who did not. Patients with a diverting stoma who underwent late closure had the best prognosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000223/pdfft?md5=2cb2b9b3a9f749bae1e0af83a2c747c4&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X23000223-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景直肠癌低位前切除术(LAR)时,通常会形成一个转移口以防止吻合口漏。然而,目前尚不清楚转移造口如何影响预后。方法:我们在日本国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库中确定2014年接受LAR并在手术12个月内接受辅助化疗的直肠癌患者。根据是否存在转移造口来比较总生存率。只选择有造口的患者,根据造口关闭的时间来比较总生存率。结果有转移造口的患者预后明显优于无转移造口的患者(风险比[HR] 0.79, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.63 ~ 0.99, P = 0.039)。与早期闭合患者相比,晚期闭合患者的预后明显较好(HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 ~ 0.95, P = 0.031),未闭合患者的预后明显较差(HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34 ~ 3.64, P = 0.002)。结论直肠癌术后行LAR伴辅助化疗的患者,有转移造口者预后较无转移造口者好。转移造口晚期闭合的患者预后最好。
Impact of diverting stoma on long-term survival in patients with rectal cancer: A nationwide study based on health insurance claims data
Background
A diverting stoma is often created to prevent anastomotic leakage when a low anterior resection (LAR) is performed for rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear how a diverting stoma impacts the prognosis.
Methods
We identified patients with rectal cancer in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan who underwent LAR in 2014 and received adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months of surgery. Overall survival was compared according to the presence or absence of a diverting stoma. Only patients with a stoma were selected to compare overall survival according to the timing of stoma closure.
Results
Patients with a diverting stoma had a significantly better prognosis than those without a diverting stoma (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.99, P = 0.039). Compared with patients with early closure, the prognosis of patients with late closure was significantly better (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.95, P = 0.031) and that of patients without stoma closure was significantly poorer (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34–3.64, P = 0.002).
Conclusion
Among patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, those who had a diverting stoma had better prognosis than those who did not. Patients with a diverting stoma who underwent late closure had the best prognosis.