基于因果深度神经网络的高血压一线管理模型

Lee Herzog MD , Ran Ilan Ber PhD , Zehavi Horowitz-Kugler MD , Yardena Rabi BIMS , Ilan Brufman BSc , Yehuda Edo Paz MD , Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MSc, MBA
{"title":"基于因果深度神经网络的高血压一线管理模型","authors":"Lee Herzog MD ,&nbsp;Ran Ilan Ber PhD ,&nbsp;Zehavi Horowitz-Kugler MD ,&nbsp;Yardena Rabi BIMS ,&nbsp;Ilan Brufman BSc ,&nbsp;Yehuda Edo Paz MD ,&nbsp;Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MSc, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a machine learning model that predicts the most successful antihypertensive treatment for an individual.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>The causal, deep neural network-based model was trained on data from 16,917 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients attending Mayo Clinic’s primary care practices from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2021. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of primary hypertension, blood pressure and creatinine measurements before antihypertensive treatment, treatment within 9 months of diagnosis, and at least 1 year of follow up. The primary outcome was model performance in predicting the likelihood of a successful antihypertensive treatment 1 year from the start of treatment. Treatment success was defined as achieving blood pressure control with no moderate or severe adverse effects. Model validation and guideline agreement was assessed on 1000 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the training set of 16,917 participants (60.8±14.7 years; 8344 [49.3%] women), 33.8% achieved blood pressure control without moderate or severe adverse effects for at least a year with initial treatment. The most common treatment was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (39.1% average success), and the most successful was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-thiazide combination (44.4% average success). Our custom-built causal, deep neural network-based model exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting individualized treatment success with a precision of 51.7%, recall of 44.4%, and F1 score of 47.8%. Compared with actual physician practice on the validation set (77.9% agreement), the algorithm aligned with the Eighth Joint National Committee hypertension guidelines 95.7% of the time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A machine learning algorithm can accurately predict the likelihood of antihypertensive treatment success and help personalize hypertension management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 632-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294976122300086X/pdfft?md5=66841630bb2dee28cc75c3265fdb238c&pid=1-s2.0-S294976122300086X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Deep Neural Network-Based Model for First-Line Hypertension Management\",\"authors\":\"Lee Herzog MD ,&nbsp;Ran Ilan Ber PhD ,&nbsp;Zehavi Horowitz-Kugler MD ,&nbsp;Yardena Rabi BIMS ,&nbsp;Ilan Brufman BSc ,&nbsp;Yehuda Edo Paz MD ,&nbsp;Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MSc, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a machine learning model that predicts the most successful antihypertensive treatment for an individual.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>The causal, deep neural network-based model was trained on data from 16,917 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients attending Mayo Clinic’s primary care practices from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2021. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of primary hypertension, blood pressure and creatinine measurements before antihypertensive treatment, treatment within 9 months of diagnosis, and at least 1 year of follow up. The primary outcome was model performance in predicting the likelihood of a successful antihypertensive treatment 1 year from the start of treatment. Treatment success was defined as achieving blood pressure control with no moderate or severe adverse effects. Model validation and guideline agreement was assessed on 1000 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the training set of 16,917 participants (60.8±14.7 years; 8344 [49.3%] women), 33.8% achieved blood pressure control without moderate or severe adverse effects for at least a year with initial treatment. The most common treatment was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (39.1% average success), and the most successful was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-thiazide combination (44.4% average success). Our custom-built causal, deep neural network-based model exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting individualized treatment success with a precision of 51.7%, recall of 44.4%, and F1 score of 47.8%. Compared with actual physician practice on the validation set (77.9% agreement), the algorithm aligned with the Eighth Joint National Committee hypertension guidelines 95.7% of the time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A machine learning algorithm can accurately predict the likelihood of antihypertensive treatment success and help personalize hypertension management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 632-640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294976122300086X/pdfft?md5=66841630bb2dee28cc75c3265fdb238c&pid=1-s2.0-S294976122300086X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294976122300086X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294976122300086X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的开发并验证一种机器学习模型,以预测个体最成功的降压治疗。患者和方法基于因果关系的深度神经网络模型对2005年1月1日至2021年12月31日在梅奥诊所初级保健实践中就诊的16,917名新诊断的高血压患者的数据进行了训练。入选标准包括原发性高血压诊断、降压治疗前血压和肌酐测量、诊断后9个月内的治疗以及至少1年的随访。主要结果是模型在预测治疗开始1年后成功降压治疗可能性方面的表现。治疗成功的定义是达到血压控制,没有中度或严重的不良反应。对1000例患者进行模型验证和指南一致性评估。结果训练集中16917名参与者(60.8±14.7岁;8344例(49.3%)女性),33.8%的患者在接受初始治疗至少一年内血压得到控制,无中度或重度不良反应。最常见的治疗是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(平均成功率39.1%),最成功的是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂-噻嗪类药物联合(平均成功率44.4%)。我们定制的因果关系,基于深度神经网络的模型在预测个体化治疗成功方面显示出最高的准确性,准确率为51.7%,召回率为44.4%,F1评分为47.8%。与医生在验证集上的实际实践(77.9%的一致性)相比,该算法与第八届全国联合委员会高血压指南的一致性为95.7%。结论机器学习算法可以准确预测降压治疗成功的可能性,有助于高血压的个性化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal Deep Neural Network-Based Model for First-Line Hypertension Management

Objective

To develop and validate a machine learning model that predicts the most successful antihypertensive treatment for an individual.

Patients and Methods

The causal, deep neural network-based model was trained on data from 16,917 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients attending Mayo Clinic’s primary care practices from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2021. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of primary hypertension, blood pressure and creatinine measurements before antihypertensive treatment, treatment within 9 months of diagnosis, and at least 1 year of follow up. The primary outcome was model performance in predicting the likelihood of a successful antihypertensive treatment 1 year from the start of treatment. Treatment success was defined as achieving blood pressure control with no moderate or severe adverse effects. Model validation and guideline agreement was assessed on 1000 patients.

Results

In the training set of 16,917 participants (60.8±14.7 years; 8344 [49.3%] women), 33.8% achieved blood pressure control without moderate or severe adverse effects for at least a year with initial treatment. The most common treatment was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (39.1% average success), and the most successful was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-thiazide combination (44.4% average success). Our custom-built causal, deep neural network-based model exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting individualized treatment success with a precision of 51.7%, recall of 44.4%, and F1 score of 47.8%. Compared with actual physician practice on the validation set (77.9% agreement), the algorithm aligned with the Eighth Joint National Committee hypertension guidelines 95.7% of the time.

Conclusion

A machine learning algorithm can accurately predict the likelihood of antihypertensive treatment success and help personalize hypertension management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Developing a Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Strategic Considerations for Selecting Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Institutional Integration: A Single-Center Experience Reviewers for Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (2024) A Blueprint for Clinical-Driven Medical Device Development: The Feverkidstool Application to Identify Children With Serious Bacterial Infection Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiograms for Early Detection of Low Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the Electrocardiogram Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1