人工授精前后精液参数分析和总活动精子计数对妊娠结局的混杂影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Fertility & Sterility Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.22074/ijfs.2023.560766.1355
Michael H Dahan, Seang-Lin Tan, Suresh Nair, Tehila Feinberg Isaacs
{"title":"人工授精前后精液参数分析和总活动精子计数对妊娠结局的混杂影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Michael H Dahan, Seang-Lin Tan, Suresh Nair, Tehila Feinberg Isaacs","doi":"10.22074/ijfs.2023.560766.1355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to determine whether pre or post-processing semen parameters obtained during intrauterine insemination (IUI) predict pregnancy when controlling for confounding effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study of 2231 semen analyses was conducted at McGill University of IVF center. Any couples who underwent IUI with partner sperm, over a 2.5-year period, were included. Controlled ovarian stimulation was done with Clomiphene Citrate, Letrozole, or Gonadotropins. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests, two types of stepwise logistic regression, and stepwise discriminant analysis. A comparison of pre and post-processing semen parameters was undertaken to determine the probability of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences between pregnant and non-pregnant women in post-processing concentration (P=0.043), post-processing total motile sperm count (TMSC) (P=0.049), and post-linearity (P=0.012). However, when variable out-of-the-equation logistic regression or discriminant analysis, which controls for confounding effects between variables, were used, the findings were no longer significant. It was statistically proven that when a variable in the equation logistic regression was employed, post-processing concentration (P=0.005) and post-processing TMSC (P=0.009) remained reliable predictors of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two of three prediction models suggested that TMSC's relationship with pregnancy is due to confounding factors. One model maintained the validity of the TMSC. While TMSC has always been studied as an important predictor of insemination pregnancies, this finding may be due to confounding effects between semen parameters and therefore requires further investigation as to this relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":14080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","volume":"18 1","pages":"20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of pre and post-Processing Semen Parameters at The Time of Intrauterine Insemination; and The Confounding Effects of Total Motile Sperm Counts on Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael H Dahan, Seang-Lin Tan, Suresh Nair, Tehila Feinberg Isaacs\",\"doi\":\"10.22074/ijfs.2023.560766.1355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to determine whether pre or post-processing semen parameters obtained during intrauterine insemination (IUI) predict pregnancy when controlling for confounding effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study of 2231 semen analyses was conducted at McGill University of IVF center. Any couples who underwent IUI with partner sperm, over a 2.5-year period, were included. Controlled ovarian stimulation was done with Clomiphene Citrate, Letrozole, or Gonadotropins. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests, two types of stepwise logistic regression, and stepwise discriminant analysis. A comparison of pre and post-processing semen parameters was undertaken to determine the probability of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences between pregnant and non-pregnant women in post-processing concentration (P=0.043), post-processing total motile sperm count (TMSC) (P=0.049), and post-linearity (P=0.012). However, when variable out-of-the-equation logistic regression or discriminant analysis, which controls for confounding effects between variables, were used, the findings were no longer significant. It was statistically proven that when a variable in the equation logistic regression was employed, post-processing concentration (P=0.005) and post-processing TMSC (P=0.009) remained reliable predictors of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two of three prediction models suggested that TMSC's relationship with pregnancy is due to confounding factors. One model maintained the validity of the TMSC. While TMSC has always been studied as an important predictor of insemination pregnancies, this finding may be due to confounding effects between semen parameters and therefore requires further investigation as to this relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"20-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2023.560766.1355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2023.560766.1355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在确定在控制混杂效应的情况下,宫内人工授精(IUI)过程中获得的精液参数处理前后是否能预测妊娠。材料和方法:在麦吉尔大学试管婴儿中心进行了一项2231例精液分析的前瞻性队列研究。在2.5年的时间里,任何使用伴侣精子进行人工授精的夫妇都被包括在内。对照卵巢刺激用克罗米芬、来曲唑或促性腺激素。采用t检验、两种逐步逻辑回归和逐步判别分析进行统计分析。对处理前和处理后的精液参数进行比较,以确定怀孕的可能性。结果:孕妇与非孕妇处理后精子浓度(P=0.043)、处理后总活动精子数(TMSC) (P=0.049)、处理后线性(P=0.012)差异均有统计学意义。然而,当变量方程外逻辑回归或判别分析(控制变量之间的混淆效应)被使用时,结果不再显著。采用logistic回归方程中的变量,经统计学证明,处理后的浓度(P=0.005)和处理后的TMSC (P=0.009)仍然是妊娠的可靠预测因子。结论:三种预测模型中有两种提示TMSC与妊娠的关系是由混杂因素引起的。一个模型维持了TMSC的有效性。虽然TMSC一直被研究为人工授精妊娠的重要预测因子,但这一发现可能是由于精液参数之间的混淆效应,因此需要进一步研究这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of pre and post-Processing Semen Parameters at The Time of Intrauterine Insemination; and The Confounding Effects of Total Motile Sperm Counts on Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: This study aims to determine whether pre or post-processing semen parameters obtained during intrauterine insemination (IUI) predict pregnancy when controlling for confounding effects.

Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study of 2231 semen analyses was conducted at McGill University of IVF center. Any couples who underwent IUI with partner sperm, over a 2.5-year period, were included. Controlled ovarian stimulation was done with Clomiphene Citrate, Letrozole, or Gonadotropins. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests, two types of stepwise logistic regression, and stepwise discriminant analysis. A comparison of pre and post-processing semen parameters was undertaken to determine the probability of pregnancy.

Results: There were significant differences between pregnant and non-pregnant women in post-processing concentration (P=0.043), post-processing total motile sperm count (TMSC) (P=0.049), and post-linearity (P=0.012). However, when variable out-of-the-equation logistic regression or discriminant analysis, which controls for confounding effects between variables, were used, the findings were no longer significant. It was statistically proven that when a variable in the equation logistic regression was employed, post-processing concentration (P=0.005) and post-processing TMSC (P=0.009) remained reliable predictors of pregnancy.

Conclusion: Two of three prediction models suggested that TMSC's relationship with pregnancy is due to confounding factors. One model maintained the validity of the TMSC. While TMSC has always been studied as an important predictor of insemination pregnancies, this finding may be due to confounding effects between semen parameters and therefore requires further investigation as to this relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Fertility & Sterility is a quarterly English publication of Royan Institute . The aim of the journal is to disseminate information through publishing the most recent scientific research studies on Fertility and Sterility and other related topics. Int J Fertil Steril has been certified by Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in 2007 and was accredited as a scientific and research journal by HBI (Health and Biomedical Information) Journal Accreditation Commission in 2008. Int J Fertil Steril is an Open Access journal.
期刊最新文献
Combined Effects of Chrysin Supplementation and Exercise Training on Diabetes-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in Rat Testicular Tissue. Association of The MCP-1 rs1024611 Polymorphism with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in A Population of Indian Women: A Case-Control Study. Clinical Pregnancy and Miscarriage Rates in relation to Vitamin D Supplementation among women with Hyper Androgenic PCOS: A prospective study. Impact of Varicocele on The Expression of Testicular Enzymes Involved in The Transsulfuration Pathway. Relation of Follicular Fluid Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products Concentration and Anti Mullerian Hormone in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Non-PCOS Women Referring to In Vitro Fertilization Center: Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1