病人的经验和观点的院后随访护理,以改善身体恢复重症监护幸存者:一个系统的回顾定性研究

Nicola M.A. Rea , Lis Neubeck , Kalliopi Kydonaki , Sheona McHale
{"title":"病人的经验和观点的院后随访护理,以改善身体恢复重症监护幸存者:一个系统的回顾定性研究","authors":"Nicola M.A. Rea ,&nbsp;Lis Neubeck ,&nbsp;Kalliopi Kydonaki ,&nbsp;Sheona McHale","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intensive care units deliver care to a heterogeneous group of patients with pre-existing co-morbid disease. Focus has shifted to improving health related quality of life with more patients surviving beyond hospital discharge. Randomised controlled trials evaluating follow-up interventions, to improve physical recovery, have not demonstrated a health-related quality of life benefit. Qualitative research may provide the context to understand the experiences of intensive care survivors during follow-up care addressing physical limitations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To synthesise qualitative studies and explore Intensive Care survivors’ experiences and perspectives of physical symptoms in the context of follow-up care.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Ovid Nursing and Ovid Emcare) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed primary qualitative studies. No date parameters were applied. Inclusion/exclusion criteria guided the screening process.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>The data from eligible primary research studies was extracted into NVivo (v12).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Critical appraisal was completed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke (2022), informed the data synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2457 studies, ten relevant studies were included. Two main themes were identified: 1. Recovery as uncertain; which outlines the uncertainty experienced by intensive care unit survivors during recovery. This theme pertained to system-level factors (role of healthcare professional and information provision) which provides the context for delivering follow-up care. 2. Self-determination of recovery; outlines individual characteristics in determining recovery which is conceptualised by patient-level factors (motivation, support network and perception of health).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>For intensive care survivors, the recovery trajectory is uncertain with a gap in information provision during the acute phase following hospital discharge. Patients’ self-determination of recovery is an important consideration to ensure follow-up care addresses the needs of individual patients. The impact of pre-existing co-morbid disease and subgroups of patients deriving benefit from follow-up care remains uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>PROSPERO Registration no. CRD42022355711</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>Patients’ experiences of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000528/pdfft?md5=3c1746b182e7a83be398930098d1fae4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X23000528-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients’ experiences and perspectives of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A systematic review of qualitative research\",\"authors\":\"Nicola M.A. Rea ,&nbsp;Lis Neubeck ,&nbsp;Kalliopi Kydonaki ,&nbsp;Sheona McHale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intensive care units deliver care to a heterogeneous group of patients with pre-existing co-morbid disease. Focus has shifted to improving health related quality of life with more patients surviving beyond hospital discharge. Randomised controlled trials evaluating follow-up interventions, to improve physical recovery, have not demonstrated a health-related quality of life benefit. Qualitative research may provide the context to understand the experiences of intensive care survivors during follow-up care addressing physical limitations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To synthesise qualitative studies and explore Intensive Care survivors’ experiences and perspectives of physical symptoms in the context of follow-up care.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Ovid Nursing and Ovid Emcare) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed primary qualitative studies. No date parameters were applied. Inclusion/exclusion criteria guided the screening process.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>The data from eligible primary research studies was extracted into NVivo (v12).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Critical appraisal was completed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke (2022), informed the data synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2457 studies, ten relevant studies were included. Two main themes were identified: 1. Recovery as uncertain; which outlines the uncertainty experienced by intensive care unit survivors during recovery. This theme pertained to system-level factors (role of healthcare professional and information provision) which provides the context for delivering follow-up care. 2. Self-determination of recovery; outlines individual characteristics in determining recovery which is conceptualised by patient-level factors (motivation, support network and perception of health).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>For intensive care survivors, the recovery trajectory is uncertain with a gap in information provision during the acute phase following hospital discharge. Patients’ self-determination of recovery is an important consideration to ensure follow-up care addresses the needs of individual patients. The impact of pre-existing co-morbid disease and subgroups of patients deriving benefit from follow-up care remains uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>PROSPERO Registration no. CRD42022355711</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>Patients’ experiences of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000528/pdfft?md5=3c1746b182e7a83be398930098d1fae4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X23000528-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护室为存在并存疾病的异质患者提供护理。重点已转移到改善与健康相关的生活质量,更多的患者在出院后存活下来。评估随访干预以改善身体恢复的随机对照试验未显示出与健康相关的生活质量益处。定性研究可以提供上下文,以了解重症监护幸存者的经验,在后续护理解决身体限制。背景(5)系统检索电子数据库(MEDLINE、护理与联合健康文献累积索引、Web of Science、应用社会科学索引与摘要、Ovid Nursing和Ovid Emcare),筛选经同行评议的初步定性研究。没有应用日期参数。纳入/排除标准指导筛选过程。从符合条件的初步研究中提取数据到NVivo (v12)中。方法采用乔安娜·布里格斯批判性评估工具完成批判性评估。以Braun和Clarke(2022)为指导的主题分析为数据综合提供了依据。结果从2457项研究中纳入10项相关研究。确定了两个主要主题:复苏不确定;它概述了重症监护病房幸存者在康复期间所经历的不确定性。该主题涉及系统级因素(医疗保健专业人员的作用和信息提供),为提供后续护理提供了背景。2. 恢复的自决;概述了决定康复的个体特征,这是由患者层面的因素概念化的(动机、支持网络和健康感知)。结论重症监护幸存者的康复轨迹不确定,出院后急性期的信息提供存在空白。患者对康复的自我决定是一个重要的考虑因素,以确保后续护理解决个别患者的需求。已存在的合并症和从随访护理中获益的患者亚组的影响仍不确定。注册号普洛斯彼罗注册号【摘要】重症监护幸存者院后随访护理改善其身体恢复的患者体验:质性研究的系统回顾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients’ experiences and perspectives of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A systematic review of qualitative research

Background

Intensive care units deliver care to a heterogeneous group of patients with pre-existing co-morbid disease. Focus has shifted to improving health related quality of life with more patients surviving beyond hospital discharge. Randomised controlled trials evaluating follow-up interventions, to improve physical recovery, have not demonstrated a health-related quality of life benefit. Qualitative research may provide the context to understand the experiences of intensive care survivors during follow-up care addressing physical limitations.

Objective

To synthesise qualitative studies and explore Intensive Care survivors’ experiences and perspectives of physical symptoms in the context of follow-up care.

Setting(s)

A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Ovid Nursing and Ovid Emcare) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed primary qualitative studies. No date parameters were applied. Inclusion/exclusion criteria guided the screening process.

Participants

The data from eligible primary research studies was extracted into NVivo (v12).

Methods

Critical appraisal was completed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke (2022), informed the data synthesis.

Results

From 2457 studies, ten relevant studies were included. Two main themes were identified: 1. Recovery as uncertain; which outlines the uncertainty experienced by intensive care unit survivors during recovery. This theme pertained to system-level factors (role of healthcare professional and information provision) which provides the context for delivering follow-up care. 2. Self-determination of recovery; outlines individual characteristics in determining recovery which is conceptualised by patient-level factors (motivation, support network and perception of health).

Conclusions

For intensive care survivors, the recovery trajectory is uncertain with a gap in information provision during the acute phase following hospital discharge. Patients’ self-determination of recovery is an important consideration to ensure follow-up care addresses the needs of individual patients. The impact of pre-existing co-morbid disease and subgroups of patients deriving benefit from follow-up care remains uncertain.

Registration

PROSPERO Registration no. CRD42022355711

Tweetable abstract

Patients’ experiences of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Nurse leaders’ recommendations for implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive practices in health systems: A qualitative descriptive study Nursing interventions in a newly established community health nursing system: A cross sectional survey Grit, academic resilience, and mindset of nursing students: A cross-sectional study Psychological safety in enhancing the competence of nurse educators among early career nursing faculty in Japan: A cross-sectional study How can family members of patients in the intensive care unit be supported? A systematic review of qualitative reviews, meta-synthesis, and novel recommendations for nursing care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1