超声皮质骨厚度测量:能否预测儿科人群的骨密度?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Diagnostic and interventional radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-13 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.4274/dir.2023.232392
Uğur Ufuk Işın, Emin Çakmakçı, Ayşe Derya Buluş, Yüksel Yaşartekin, Öznur Ünal, Onur Dirican, Abbas Ali Husseini
{"title":"超声皮质骨厚度测量:能否预测儿科人群的骨密度?","authors":"Uğur Ufuk Işın, Emin Çakmakçı, Ayşe Derya Buluş, Yüksel Yaşartekin, Öznur Ünal, Onur Dirican, Abbas Ali Husseini","doi":"10.4274/dir.2023.232392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore sonographic cortical bone thickness (CoT) as a potential indicator of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for screening and diagnosing pediatric osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study included 41 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients and 52 healthy children. Radius cortical thickness (R-CoT), tibial cortical thickness (T-CoT), and second metatarsal cortical thickness (M-CoT) were measured by B-mode ultrasound; CoT values were compared between groups and the correlation between BMD and CoT was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in R-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.433), T-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.057), and M-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.978) values between the patient and control groups. No significant correlations were found between BMD T-scores and R-CoT (r = -0.073, <i>P</i> = 0.490), T-CoT (r = -0.154, <i>P</i> = 0.141), and M-CoT (r = 0.047, <i>P</i> = 0.657) values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sonographic CoT values in children do not correlate with BMD values. Unlike in adults, sonographic CoT measurements do not appear to have a role in assessing BMD in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sonographic cortical bone thickness measurement: can it predict bone mineral density in the pediatric population?\",\"authors\":\"Uğur Ufuk Işın, Emin Çakmakçı, Ayşe Derya Buluş, Yüksel Yaşartekin, Öznur Ünal, Onur Dirican, Abbas Ali Husseini\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2023.232392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore sonographic cortical bone thickness (CoT) as a potential indicator of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for screening and diagnosing pediatric osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study included 41 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients and 52 healthy children. Radius cortical thickness (R-CoT), tibial cortical thickness (T-CoT), and second metatarsal cortical thickness (M-CoT) were measured by B-mode ultrasound; CoT values were compared between groups and the correlation between BMD and CoT was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in R-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.433), T-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.057), and M-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.978) values between the patient and control groups. No significant correlations were found between BMD T-scores and R-CoT (r = -0.073, <i>P</i> = 0.490), T-CoT (r = -0.154, <i>P</i> = 0.141), and M-CoT (r = 0.047, <i>P</i> = 0.657) values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sonographic CoT values in children do not correlate with BMD values. Unlike in adults, sonographic CoT measurements do not appear to have a role in assessing BMD in the pediatric population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.232392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.232392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨超声皮质骨厚度(CoT)作为双能x线骨密度(BMD)的潜在指标对儿童骨质疏松症的筛查和诊断价值。方法:前瞻性研究纳入41例骨质减少或骨质疏松患者和52例健康儿童。b超测量桡骨皮质厚度(R-CoT)、胫骨皮质厚度(T-CoT)、第二跖骨皮质厚度(M-CoT);比较各组间CoT值,并分析BMD与CoT的相关性。结果:患者与对照组R-CoT (P = 0.433)、T-CoT (P = 0.057)、M-CoT (P = 0.978)差异均无统计学意义。BMD t评分与r - cot (r = -0.073, P = 0.490)、T-CoT (r = -0.154, P = 0.141)、M-CoT (r = 0.047, P = 0.657)无显著相关性。结论:儿童超声CoT值与BMD值无相关性。与成人不同,超声CoT测量在儿科人群中似乎没有评估骨密度的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sonographic cortical bone thickness measurement: can it predict bone mineral density in the pediatric population?

Purpose: To explore sonographic cortical bone thickness (CoT) as a potential indicator of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for screening and diagnosing pediatric osteoporosis.

Methods: A prospective study included 41 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients and 52 healthy children. Radius cortical thickness (R-CoT), tibial cortical thickness (T-CoT), and second metatarsal cortical thickness (M-CoT) were measured by B-mode ultrasound; CoT values were compared between groups and the correlation between BMD and CoT was examined.

Results: There were no significant differences in R-CoT (P = 0.433), T-CoT (P = 0.057), and M-CoT (P = 0.978) values between the patient and control groups. No significant correlations were found between BMD T-scores and R-CoT (r = -0.073, P = 0.490), T-CoT (r = -0.154, P = 0.141), and M-CoT (r = 0.047, P = 0.657) values.

Conclusion: Sonographic CoT values in children do not correlate with BMD values. Unlike in adults, sonographic CoT measurements do not appear to have a role in assessing BMD in the pediatric population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the flare sign in predicting extracapsular extension in metastatic axillary lymph nodes and nodal status on breast magnetic resonance imaging. Challenges associated with percutaneous nephrostomy in infants Correlation between computed tomography-based body composition parameters and hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Experimental study of a canine model for a newly designed adjustable prefenestration aortic stent graft Pre-procedure 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging improves the performance of CT-guided transthoracic biopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1