重度抑郁症元认知治疗的患者动机和依从性:一项观察性研究。

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863
Espen R Lassen, Susanne Aabel Lia, Ingrid Hjertaas, Odin Hjemdal, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Roger Hagen, Stian Solem
{"title":"重度抑郁症元认知治疗的患者动机和依从性:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Espen R Lassen, Susanne Aabel Lia, Ingrid Hjertaas, Odin Hjemdal, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Roger Hagen, Stian Solem","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this observational study was to examine the predictive and discriminant validity of patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy (MCT) for depression. Motivational development for recovered- and non-recovered patients was also investigated. Motivation in sessions 1, 4, and 7 was measured using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.5 (MISC) in a 10-session trial of MCT for depression (<i>N =</i> 37). Adherence was assessed with the CBT compliance measure in session 7. The Beck Depression Inventory measured treatment outcome at 3-year follow-up. Recovered patients developed significantly more <i>change talk</i> and <i>taking steps</i>, and less <i>sustain talk</i>, as therapy progressed, compared to non-recovered patients. Evidence of the predictive validity of motivation in sessions 1 and 4 was limited. Higher <i>sustain talk</i> and <i>taking steps</i> in session 7 were significant predictors of more and less depressive symptoms, respectively. There was a moderate-strong correlation between motivation and adherence. The results confirm the predictive value of MISC in sessions 7 of MCT for depression, and establish differential motivational development between recovered and non-recovered patients. Subsequent research should clarify the discriminant validity and temporal relationships between motivation, adherence, and other clinical variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy for major depressive disorder: an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Espen R Lassen, Susanne Aabel Lia, Ingrid Hjertaas, Odin Hjemdal, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Roger Hagen, Stian Solem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this observational study was to examine the predictive and discriminant validity of patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy (MCT) for depression. Motivational development for recovered- and non-recovered patients was also investigated. Motivation in sessions 1, 4, and 7 was measured using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.5 (MISC) in a 10-session trial of MCT for depression (<i>N =</i> 37). Adherence was assessed with the CBT compliance measure in session 7. The Beck Depression Inventory measured treatment outcome at 3-year follow-up. Recovered patients developed significantly more <i>change talk</i> and <i>taking steps</i>, and less <i>sustain talk</i>, as therapy progressed, compared to non-recovered patients. Evidence of the predictive validity of motivation in sessions 1 and 4 was limited. Higher <i>sustain talk</i> and <i>taking steps</i> in session 7 were significant predictors of more and less depressive symptoms, respectively. There was a moderate-strong correlation between motivation and adherence. The results confirm the predictive value of MISC in sessions 7 of MCT for depression, and establish differential motivational development between recovered and non-recovered patients. Subsequent research should clarify the discriminant validity and temporal relationships between motivation, adherence, and other clinical variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本观察性研究的目的是检验抑郁症元认知治疗(MCT)中患者动机和依从性的预测和判别有效性。对康复和未康复患者的动机发展也进行了调查。第1、4和7阶段的动机是使用动机性访谈技能代码2.5 (MISC)在10期MCT治疗抑郁症的试验中测量的(N = 37)。在第7期使用CBT依从性措施评估依从性。贝克抑郁量表在3年随访中测量治疗结果。与未康复的患者相比,随着治疗的进展,康复的患者明显有更多的改变谈话和采取措施,而更少的持续谈话。第1和第4阶段动机预测有效性的证据是有限的。较高的持续谈话和在第7阶段采取措施分别是更多和更少抑郁症状的显著预测因子。动机和依从性之间有中强的相关性。结果证实了MCT第7期中MISC对抑郁症的预测价值,并建立了康复和未康复患者之间动机发展的差异。后续研究应阐明动机、依从性和其他临床变量之间的区别效度和时间关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy for major depressive disorder: an observational study.

The aim of this observational study was to examine the predictive and discriminant validity of patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy (MCT) for depression. Motivational development for recovered- and non-recovered patients was also investigated. Motivation in sessions 1, 4, and 7 was measured using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.5 (MISC) in a 10-session trial of MCT for depression (N = 37). Adherence was assessed with the CBT compliance measure in session 7. The Beck Depression Inventory measured treatment outcome at 3-year follow-up. Recovered patients developed significantly more change talk and taking steps, and less sustain talk, as therapy progressed, compared to non-recovered patients. Evidence of the predictive validity of motivation in sessions 1 and 4 was limited. Higher sustain talk and taking steps in session 7 were significant predictors of more and less depressive symptoms, respectively. There was a moderate-strong correlation between motivation and adherence. The results confirm the predictive value of MISC in sessions 7 of MCT for depression, and establish differential motivational development between recovered and non-recovered patients. Subsequent research should clarify the discriminant validity and temporal relationships between motivation, adherence, and other clinical variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
期刊最新文献
Red ginseng polysaccharide promotes ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells by inhibiting PI3K/Akt pathway through down-regulation of AQP3. Diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for predicting the pathological grade of prostate cancer. Correction. WYC-209 inhibited GC malignant progression by down-regulating WNT4 through RARα. Efficacy and pharmacodynamic effect of anti-CD73 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in combination with cytotoxic therapy: observations from mouse tumor models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1