由非专业人员提供的肺病专家支持的健康指导提高了慢性阻塞性肺疾病高质量护理的接受:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2024
Rachel Willard-Grace, Danielle Hessler, Beatrice Huang, Denise DeVore, Chris Chirinos, Jessica Wolf, Devon Low, Chris Garvey, DorAnne Donesky, Stephanie Tsao, David H Thom, George Su
{"title":"由非专业人员提供的肺病专家支持的健康指导提高了慢性阻塞性肺疾病高质量护理的接受:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Rachel Willard-Grace, Danielle Hessler, Beatrice Huang, Denise DeVore, Chris Chirinos, Jessica Wolf, Devon Low, Chris Garvey, DorAnne Donesky, Stephanie Tsao, David H Thom, George Su","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Half of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not receive high-quality, evidenced-based care as described in international guidelines. We conducted secondary data analysis of a previously published study to assess the ability of a model of lay health coaching to improve provision of guideline-based care in a primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a randomized controlled trial, we recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients with moderate to severe COPD from primary care clinics serving a low-income, predominantly African American population. Participants were randomized to receive usual care or 9 months of health coaching from primary care personnel informed by a pulmonary specialist practitioner. Outcome measures included prescription of appropriate inhaler therapy, participation in COPD-related education, engagement with specialty care, prescription of smoking cessation medications, and patient ratings of the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline quality measures did not differ between study arms. At 9 months, coached patients were more likely (increase of 9.3% over usual care; P=0.014) to have received guideline-based inhalers compared to those in usual care. Coached patients were more likely to engage with pulmonary specialty care (increase of 8.3% over usual care with at least 1 visit; P=0.04) and educational classes (increase of 5.3% over usual care; P=0.03). Receipt of smoking cessation medications among patients smoking at baseline in the health coaching group increased 21.1 percentage points more than in usual care, a difference near statistical significance (P=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health coaching may improve the provision of quality chronic illness care for conditions such as COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"10 4","pages":"201-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary Specialist-Supported Health Coaching Delivered by Lay Personnel Improves Receipt of Quality Care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Willard-Grace, Danielle Hessler, Beatrice Huang, Denise DeVore, Chris Chirinos, Jessica Wolf, Devon Low, Chris Garvey, DorAnne Donesky, Stephanie Tsao, David H Thom, George Su\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2330-0698.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Half of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not receive high-quality, evidenced-based care as described in international guidelines. We conducted secondary data analysis of a previously published study to assess the ability of a model of lay health coaching to improve provision of guideline-based care in a primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a randomized controlled trial, we recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients with moderate to severe COPD from primary care clinics serving a low-income, predominantly African American population. Participants were randomized to receive usual care or 9 months of health coaching from primary care personnel informed by a pulmonary specialist practitioner. Outcome measures included prescription of appropriate inhaler therapy, participation in COPD-related education, engagement with specialty care, prescription of smoking cessation medications, and patient ratings of the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline quality measures did not differ between study arms. At 9 months, coached patients were more likely (increase of 9.3% over usual care; P=0.014) to have received guideline-based inhalers compared to those in usual care. Coached patients were more likely to engage with pulmonary specialty care (increase of 8.3% over usual care with at least 1 visit; P=0.04) and educational classes (increase of 5.3% over usual care; P=0.03). Receipt of smoking cessation medications among patients smoking at baseline in the health coaching group increased 21.1 percentage points more than in usual care, a difference near statistical significance (P=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health coaching may improve the provision of quality chronic illness care for conditions such as COPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"201-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688918/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:半数慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者没有得到国际指南中所描述的高质量、循证治疗。我们对先前发表的一项研究进行了二次数据分析,以评估非专业健康指导模型在初级保健环境中改善基于指南的护理的能力。方法:作为一项随机对照试验的一部分,我们从初级保健诊所招募了英语和西班牙语的中度至重度COPD患者,这些患者主要服务于低收入的非裔美国人人群。参与者被随机分为两组,一组接受常规护理,另一组接受由肺病专科医生告知的初级保健人员9个月的健康指导。结果测量包括适当吸入器治疗的处方、copd相关教育的参与、专科护理的参与、戒烟药物的处方以及患者对护理质量的评分。结果:基线质量测量在研究组之间没有差异。在9个月时,接受训练的患者更有可能(比常规护理增加9.3%;P=0.014),与接受常规护理的患者相比,接受基于指南的吸入器的患者比例更高。接受训练的患者更有可能接受肺部专科护理(比常规护理增加8.3%,至少一次就诊;P=0.04)和教育课程(比常规护理增加5.3%;P = 0.03)。在健康指导组中,基线吸烟患者接受戒烟药物治疗的比例比常规治疗组高出21.1个百分点,差异接近统计学意义(P=0.06)。结论:健康指导可以改善慢性阻塞性肺病等疾病的优质慢性疾病护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pulmonary Specialist-Supported Health Coaching Delivered by Lay Personnel Improves Receipt of Quality Care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: Half of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not receive high-quality, evidenced-based care as described in international guidelines. We conducted secondary data analysis of a previously published study to assess the ability of a model of lay health coaching to improve provision of guideline-based care in a primary care setting.

Methods: As part of a randomized controlled trial, we recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients with moderate to severe COPD from primary care clinics serving a low-income, predominantly African American population. Participants were randomized to receive usual care or 9 months of health coaching from primary care personnel informed by a pulmonary specialist practitioner. Outcome measures included prescription of appropriate inhaler therapy, participation in COPD-related education, engagement with specialty care, prescription of smoking cessation medications, and patient ratings of the quality of care.

Results: Baseline quality measures did not differ between study arms. At 9 months, coached patients were more likely (increase of 9.3% over usual care; P=0.014) to have received guideline-based inhalers compared to those in usual care. Coached patients were more likely to engage with pulmonary specialty care (increase of 8.3% over usual care with at least 1 visit; P=0.04) and educational classes (increase of 5.3% over usual care; P=0.03). Receipt of smoking cessation medications among patients smoking at baseline in the health coaching group increased 21.1 percentage points more than in usual care, a difference near statistical significance (P=0.06).

Conclusions: Health coaching may improve the provision of quality chronic illness care for conditions such as COPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
"It Is What It Is" - The Lived Experience of Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. "Ups and Downs, Joys and Sorrows" - Assessment and Clinical Relevance of Patient Priorities in an Interdisciplinary Parkinson's Disease Clinic. Assessing the Climate Readiness of Physician Education Leaders in Graduate Medical Education. Determining the Prognostic Value of Complete Blood Count Subgroup Parameters in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Factors Influencing Self-Wound Care Adoption in Singaporean Communities: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1