Wei Lin Toh, Caitlin O Yolland, Yixuan Li, Iris E Sommer, Susan Rossell
{"title":"偏头痛的多感官幻觉体验:嗅觉、体触觉和味觉先兆的初步基础。","authors":"Wei Lin Toh, Caitlin O Yolland, Yixuan Li, Iris E Sommer, Susan Rossell","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Visual auras in migraine have been extensively studied, but less is known about unusual experiences in other sensory domains, including whether they should be diagnostically considered as part of aura symptoms. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of multisensory aura experiences in migraine and their phenomenologic and clinical correlates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Respondents were 729 participants with probable migraine, who completed an online study examining unusual sensory experiences. These comprised aura experiences in the auditory, visual, olfactory, somatic-tactile, and gustatory domains. Basic demographic and clinical information and migraine symptomatology were also collected. To facilitate groupwise comparisons, participants with probable migraine were divided into those with and without (visual) aura experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endorsement of visual aura experiences was the highest (42.1%), whether in a single modality (44.2%) or multiple (55.8%) modalities, followed by somatic-tactile (32.0%), gustatory (21.9%), olfactory (18.6%), and auditory (11.0%) domains. Phenomenologic similarities, for instance, in frequency, personification, and controllability, existed across sensory domains. Somatic-tactile and gustatory auras conversely exhibited greater duration and negative emotional valence. Participants with probable migraine with visual aura tended to report significantly more severe migraine symptoms relative to those with nonvisual or no aura.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings provide preliminary indication that unusual olfactory, somatic-tactile, and gustatory experiences in migraine are common and could be clinically significant as aura symptoms. Increased clinician and patient awareness and effective management of these symptoms are essential for a holistic therapeutic approach to migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multisensory Hallucinatory Experiences in Migraine: A Preliminary Basis for Olfactory, Somatic-Tactile, and Gustatory Auras.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Lin Toh, Caitlin O Yolland, Yixuan Li, Iris E Sommer, Susan Rossell\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Visual auras in migraine have been extensively studied, but less is known about unusual experiences in other sensory domains, including whether they should be diagnostically considered as part of aura symptoms. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of multisensory aura experiences in migraine and their phenomenologic and clinical correlates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Respondents were 729 participants with probable migraine, who completed an online study examining unusual sensory experiences. These comprised aura experiences in the auditory, visual, olfactory, somatic-tactile, and gustatory domains. Basic demographic and clinical information and migraine symptomatology were also collected. To facilitate groupwise comparisons, participants with probable migraine were divided into those with and without (visual) aura experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endorsement of visual aura experiences was the highest (42.1%), whether in a single modality (44.2%) or multiple (55.8%) modalities, followed by somatic-tactile (32.0%), gustatory (21.9%), olfactory (18.6%), and auditory (11.0%) domains. Phenomenologic similarities, for instance, in frequency, personification, and controllability, existed across sensory domains. Somatic-tactile and gustatory auras conversely exhibited greater duration and negative emotional valence. Participants with probable migraine with visual aura tended to report significantly more severe migraine symptoms relative to those with nonvisual or no aura.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings provide preliminary indication that unusual olfactory, somatic-tactile, and gustatory experiences in migraine are common and could be clinically significant as aura symptoms. Increased clinician and patient awareness and effective management of these symptoms are essential for a holistic therapeutic approach to migraine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691754/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multisensory Hallucinatory Experiences in Migraine: A Preliminary Basis for Olfactory, Somatic-Tactile, and Gustatory Auras.
Background and objectives: Visual auras in migraine have been extensively studied, but less is known about unusual experiences in other sensory domains, including whether they should be diagnostically considered as part of aura symptoms. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of multisensory aura experiences in migraine and their phenomenologic and clinical correlates.
Methods: Respondents were 729 participants with probable migraine, who completed an online study examining unusual sensory experiences. These comprised aura experiences in the auditory, visual, olfactory, somatic-tactile, and gustatory domains. Basic demographic and clinical information and migraine symptomatology were also collected. To facilitate groupwise comparisons, participants with probable migraine were divided into those with and without (visual) aura experiences.
Results: Endorsement of visual aura experiences was the highest (42.1%), whether in a single modality (44.2%) or multiple (55.8%) modalities, followed by somatic-tactile (32.0%), gustatory (21.9%), olfactory (18.6%), and auditory (11.0%) domains. Phenomenologic similarities, for instance, in frequency, personification, and controllability, existed across sensory domains. Somatic-tactile and gustatory auras conversely exhibited greater duration and negative emotional valence. Participants with probable migraine with visual aura tended to report significantly more severe migraine symptoms relative to those with nonvisual or no aura.
Discussion: Our findings provide preliminary indication that unusual olfactory, somatic-tactile, and gustatory experiences in migraine are common and could be clinically significant as aura symptoms. Increased clinician and patient awareness and effective management of these symptoms are essential for a holistic therapeutic approach to migraine.
期刊介绍:
Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.