评估康复患者迷你最佳的冰岛语翻译的信度和效度:平衡评估的国际意义。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635
Sif Gylfadottir, Solveig A Arnadottir, Selma Margret Reynisdottir, Bjartey Helgadottir, Andri Thor Sigurgeirsson, Marta Gudjonsdottir
{"title":"评估康复患者迷你最佳的冰岛语翻译的信度和效度:平衡评估的国际意义。","authors":"Sif Gylfadottir, Solveig A Arnadottir, Selma Margret Reynisdottir, Bjartey Helgadottir, Andri Thor Sigurgeirsson, Marta Gudjonsdottir","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mini-BESTest (Balance Evaluation Systems Test) is a standardized balance evaluation tool. The psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest are being established around the world.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty rehabilitation inpatients (16/14 women/men), with mixed diagnoses and a range of self-assessed balance, were assessed with the: Mini-BESTest on two occasions; Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; Berg Balance Scale; Timed Up and Go test; and 10 Meter Walk Test. Statistical analyses included the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), Cronbach's alpha (α), Pearson's r, and the independent <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative reliability demonstrated good test-retest (ICC<sub>3.1</sub> = 0.84), intra-rater reliability (ICC<sub>3.1</sub> = 0.86), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC<sub>2.1</sub> = 0.96). Absolute reliability (SEM) was 1.607, and internal consistency (α) was 0.80. Construct validity was supported by a high correlation between the Mini-BESTest and other standardized measures (<i>r</i> =  ±0.6-0.73). The Mini-BESTest discriminated between patients with poor versus good self-rated balance (<i>p</i> ˂ 0.001), with no floor or ceiling effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest are comparable with the original version and other translations. These results for this mixed patient group should be relevant to clinicians and researchers internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2925-2934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest in rehabilitation patients: an international implication for balance assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Sif Gylfadottir, Solveig A Arnadottir, Selma Margret Reynisdottir, Bjartey Helgadottir, Andri Thor Sigurgeirsson, Marta Gudjonsdottir\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mini-BESTest (Balance Evaluation Systems Test) is a standardized balance evaluation tool. The psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest are being established around the world.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty rehabilitation inpatients (16/14 women/men), with mixed diagnoses and a range of self-assessed balance, were assessed with the: Mini-BESTest on two occasions; Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; Berg Balance Scale; Timed Up and Go test; and 10 Meter Walk Test. Statistical analyses included the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), Cronbach's alpha (α), Pearson's r, and the independent <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative reliability demonstrated good test-retest (ICC<sub>3.1</sub> = 0.84), intra-rater reliability (ICC<sub>3.1</sub> = 0.86), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC<sub>2.1</sub> = 0.96). Absolute reliability (SEM) was 1.607, and internal consistency (α) was 0.80. Construct validity was supported by a high correlation between the Mini-BESTest and other standardized measures (<i>r</i> =  ±0.6-0.73). The Mini-BESTest discriminated between patients with poor versus good self-rated balance (<i>p</i> ˂ 0.001), with no floor or ceiling effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest are comparable with the original version and other translations. These results for this mixed patient group should be relevant to clinicians and researchers internationally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2925-2934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Mini-BESTest(平衡评估系统测试)是一个标准化的平衡评估工具。迷你best的心理测量特性正在世界各地建立。目的:本研究旨在评估迷你best的冰岛语翻译的信度和效度。方法:对30例康复住院患者(16/14男/ 16),混合诊断和一系列自评平衡,分别进行2次mini - best评估;特定活动平衡信心量表;伯格平衡量表;计时Up和Go测试;和10米步行测试。统计分析包括类内相关系数(ICC)、计量标准误差(SEM)、Cronbach’s α (α)、Pearson’s r和独立t检验。结果:相对信度表现为良好的重测信度(ICC3.1 = 0.84),评分内信度(ICC3.1 = 0.86),评分间信度(ICC2.1 = 0.96)。绝对信度(SEM)为1.607,内部一致性(α)为0.80。Mini-BESTest与其他标准化测量之间的高度相关(r =±0.6-0.73)支持结构效度。mini - best区分自我评定平衡差和良好的患者(p小于0.001),没有下限或上限效应。结论:迷你best的冰岛语翻译的心理测量学特征与原文和其他翻译具有可比性。这些混合患者组的结果应该与国际临床医生和研究人员相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest in rehabilitation patients: an international implication for balance assessment.

Background: The Mini-BESTest (Balance Evaluation Systems Test) is a standardized balance evaluation tool. The psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest are being established around the world.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest.

Methods: Thirty rehabilitation inpatients (16/14 women/men), with mixed diagnoses and a range of self-assessed balance, were assessed with the: Mini-BESTest on two occasions; Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; Berg Balance Scale; Timed Up and Go test; and 10 Meter Walk Test. Statistical analyses included the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), Cronbach's alpha (α), Pearson's r, and the independent t-test.

Results: Relative reliability demonstrated good test-retest (ICC3.1 = 0.84), intra-rater reliability (ICC3.1 = 0.86), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC2.1 = 0.96). Absolute reliability (SEM) was 1.607, and internal consistency (α) was 0.80. Construct validity was supported by a high correlation between the Mini-BESTest and other standardized measures (r =  ±0.6-0.73). The Mini-BESTest discriminated between patients with poor versus good self-rated balance (p ˂ 0.001), with no floor or ceiling effects.

Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest are comparable with the original version and other translations. These results for this mixed patient group should be relevant to clinicians and researchers internationally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in people with Parkinson disease. Feasibility study of a home-based graded motor imagery intervention (GraMI protocol) for amputees with phantom limb pain. Can physiotherapy in an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation setting improve physical function? A long-term mixed methods follow-up study. "Exploring job demands and resources influencing mental health and work engagement among physical therapists: a cross-sectional survey of Norwegian physical therapists." Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1