[《运动员恐惧回避问卷(AFAQ)》的效度与信度检验]。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Sportverletzung-Sportschaden Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2176-4349
Salvatore Giangreco, Thomas Benz, Hannu Luomajoki, Quinten Felsch
{"title":"[《运动员恐惧回避问卷(AFAQ)》的效度与信度检验]。","authors":"Salvatore Giangreco, Thomas Benz, Hannu Luomajoki, Quinten Felsch","doi":"10.1055/a-2176-4349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sports injuries may have severe implications for an athlete's career. Psychological factors play an important role on an athlete's journey from the injury to the return to competitive sports. These factors are often insufficiently evaluated, which may lead to prolonged downtime. The Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) may be used to measure fear avoidance patterns in injured athletes. There is no validated German version of the questionnaire at this time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the transculturally translated German version of the AFAQ (AFAQ_D) in injured athletes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The German version of the AFAQ_D was translated using the TRAPD model. Construct validity was evaluated with correlations to the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's Alpha, while the interclass coefficient was used to calculate test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 64 athletes aged 16 to 36 years (Ø 23.15 years, ♀ 17%, ♂ 83%) after a variety of injuries. The AFAQ_D yielded good reliability values with Crohnbach's Alpha being 0.76 (95%CI; 0.67-0.84) in the first measurement and 0.82 (95%CI; 0.76-0.88) in the second measurement, and the interclass coefficient being 0.798 (95%CI; 0.674-0.876). Regarding validity, a moderate correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the TSK (r=0.57, p<0.01), and a weak and non-significant correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the FABQ (r=0.13, p=0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By and large, the German version of the AFAQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire to evaluate fear avoidance as well as the psychological readiness of athletes after an injury. Correlations with TSK and FABQ are roughly comparable with the original study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51169,"journal":{"name":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","volume":"37 4","pages":"164-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validation and reliability testing of the \\\"Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ)\\\"].\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore Giangreco, Thomas Benz, Hannu Luomajoki, Quinten Felsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2176-4349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sports injuries may have severe implications for an athlete's career. Psychological factors play an important role on an athlete's journey from the injury to the return to competitive sports. These factors are often insufficiently evaluated, which may lead to prolonged downtime. The Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) may be used to measure fear avoidance patterns in injured athletes. There is no validated German version of the questionnaire at this time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the transculturally translated German version of the AFAQ (AFAQ_D) in injured athletes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The German version of the AFAQ_D was translated using the TRAPD model. Construct validity was evaluated with correlations to the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's Alpha, while the interclass coefficient was used to calculate test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 64 athletes aged 16 to 36 years (Ø 23.15 years, ♀ 17%, ♂ 83%) after a variety of injuries. The AFAQ_D yielded good reliability values with Crohnbach's Alpha being 0.76 (95%CI; 0.67-0.84) in the first measurement and 0.82 (95%CI; 0.76-0.88) in the second measurement, and the interclass coefficient being 0.798 (95%CI; 0.674-0.876). Regarding validity, a moderate correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the TSK (r=0.57, p<0.01), and a weak and non-significant correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the FABQ (r=0.13, p=0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By and large, the German version of the AFAQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire to evaluate fear avoidance as well as the psychological readiness of athletes after an injury. Correlations with TSK and FABQ are roughly comparable with the original study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"164-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2176-4349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2176-4349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动损伤可能对运动员的职业生涯产生严重的影响。心理因素在运动员从受伤到重返竞技体育的过程中起着重要的作用。这些因素通常没有得到充分的评估,这可能导致停机时间延长。运动员恐惧回避问卷(AFAQ)可用于测量受伤运动员的恐惧回避模式。目前没有有效的德文版本的问卷。目的:本研究旨在评估跨文化翻译德文版AFAQ_D (AFAQ_D)在受伤运动员中的重测信度、内部一致性和结构效度。方法:采用TRAPD模型对AFAQ_D德文版本进行翻译。通过恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)和坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)的相关性来评估结构效度。内部一致性采用Cronbach’s Alpha计算,类间系数计算重测信度。结果:本研究纳入了64名16 ~ 36岁的运动员,年龄为Ø 23.15岁,♀17%,♂83%。AFAQ_D具有良好的信度值,Crohnbach's Alpha为0.76 (95%CI;第一次测量0.67-0.84),0.82 (95%CI;第二次测量为0.76-0.88),类间系数为0.798 (95%CI;0.674 - -0.876)。效度方面,AFAQ_D与TSK存在中度相关(r=0.57, p)。结论:德文版AFAQ量表总体上是一份有效、可靠的评估运动员受伤后恐惧回避和心理准备的问卷。与TSK和FABQ的相关性与原始研究大致相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Validation and reliability testing of the "Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ)"].

Background: Sports injuries may have severe implications for an athlete's career. Psychological factors play an important role on an athlete's journey from the injury to the return to competitive sports. These factors are often insufficiently evaluated, which may lead to prolonged downtime. The Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) may be used to measure fear avoidance patterns in injured athletes. There is no validated German version of the questionnaire at this time.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the transculturally translated German version of the AFAQ (AFAQ_D) in injured athletes.

Method: The German version of the AFAQ_D was translated using the TRAPD model. Construct validity was evaluated with correlations to the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's Alpha, while the interclass coefficient was used to calculate test-retest reliability.

Results: This study included 64 athletes aged 16 to 36 years (Ø 23.15 years, ♀ 17%, ♂ 83%) after a variety of injuries. The AFAQ_D yielded good reliability values with Crohnbach's Alpha being 0.76 (95%CI; 0.67-0.84) in the first measurement and 0.82 (95%CI; 0.76-0.88) in the second measurement, and the interclass coefficient being 0.798 (95%CI; 0.674-0.876). Regarding validity, a moderate correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the TSK (r=0.57, p<0.01), and a weak and non-significant correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the FABQ (r=0.13, p=0.31).

Conclusion: By and large, the German version of the AFAQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire to evaluate fear avoidance as well as the psychological readiness of athletes after an injury. Correlations with TSK and FABQ are roughly comparable with the original study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ihr Forum - Die Zeitschrift Sportverletzung-Sportschaden Infos von A bis Z: Grundlagen, Prävention und Rehabilitation Topaktuelle Themen: Abbildung der Verletzungen/Prävention bei Trendsportarten Vielfältiges Spektrum: Physiotherapie, Wissenschaft und angewandte Forschung, neue Produkte und Hilfsmittel Aktuelle Themen mit echtem Nutzwert Sporttraumatologie: Prävention, Therapie, Rehabilitation Sportphysiotherapie: Grundlagen, Biomechanik, Manuelle Therapie, Funktionelle Therapie, Trainingstherapie im Sport, Geräte, Trends
期刊最新文献
[The preventive flexion osteotomy at the head of the tibia]. Treatment of Arthrogenic-Muscle-Inhibition in patients after knee-surgery with Motion-Activated-Neuromuscular stimulation - a case-series. Suture Bridge Fixation in Treating Traumatic Femoral Osteochondral Injuries in Adults: A Case Study and Review of the Literature. Why Median Severity and Ordinal Scale Severity Values should not be used for Injury Burden Results: A Critical Review. [Intramuscular tendon injuries of the thigh: diagnostic evaluation, surgical treatment, and rehabilitation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1