{"title":"女性偏头痛患者的前庭诱发肌源性和听觉脑干诱发电位。","authors":"Inan Rahşan, Ulutaş Samiye, Yildirim Ahmet","doi":"10.18071/isz.76.0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) response characteristics and to understand the pathophy­siology of vestibular dysfunction in female migraineurs with vertigo symptoms. We also aimed to assess the electrophysiological di­­agnostic significance of the VEMP respon­ses in vestibular migraine (VM). </p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>23 patients with migraine without aura (MoA), 23 patients with VM, and 20 sex-and age-matched healthy controls, a total of 66 female participants were enrolled in this study. The outcome parameters were asymmetry ratios (ARs), amplitudes of oVEMP, cVEMP, N1P1, P13N23, and the respective latencies (mean ± SD). From the BAEP graphs, absolute and interpeak interval latencies of waves were analyzed. </p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>30.4% of the MoA group and 21.7% of the VM group had uni- or bilaterally absent cVEMP responses which were statistically significant only in the MoA group (p=0.035) in comparison to control group. Both groups displayed statistically insignificant absent or asymmetrical responses for oVEMP (13.1%). Cervical VEMP P13 and N23 latency, peak-to-peak amplitude, interaural latencies, and amplitude ARs did not show any significant difference between MoA and VM patients and healthy controls. No significant difference was detected among the three groups in the oVEMP and BAEP parameters.</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Although absent cVEMP responses were more common in MoA and VM patients than in healthy individuals, the VEMP and BAEP test results should not be used in the differential diagnosis of VM and MoA. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"76 11-12","pages":"399-407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vestibular evoked myogenic and auditory brainstem evoked potentials in a female migraine population.\",\"authors\":\"Inan Rahşan, Ulutaş Samiye, Yildirim Ahmet\",\"doi\":\"10.18071/isz.76.0399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) response characteristics and to understand the pathophy­siology of vestibular dysfunction in female migraineurs with vertigo symptoms. We also aimed to assess the electrophysiological di­­agnostic significance of the VEMP respon­ses in vestibular migraine (VM). </p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>23 patients with migraine without aura (MoA), 23 patients with VM, and 20 sex-and age-matched healthy controls, a total of 66 female participants were enrolled in this study. The outcome parameters were asymmetry ratios (ARs), amplitudes of oVEMP, cVEMP, N1P1, P13N23, and the respective latencies (mean ± SD). From the BAEP graphs, absolute and interpeak interval latencies of waves were analyzed. </p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>30.4% of the MoA group and 21.7% of the VM group had uni- or bilaterally absent cVEMP responses which were statistically significant only in the MoA group (p=0.035) in comparison to control group. Both groups displayed statistically insignificant absent or asymmetrical responses for oVEMP (13.1%). Cervical VEMP P13 and N23 latency, peak-to-peak amplitude, interaural latencies, and amplitude ARs did not show any significant difference between MoA and VM patients and healthy controls. No significant difference was detected among the three groups in the oVEMP and BAEP parameters.</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Although absent cVEMP responses were more common in MoA and VM patients than in healthy individuals, the VEMP and BAEP test results should not be used in the differential diagnosis of VM and MoA. </p>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"76 11-12\",\"pages\":\"399-407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:本研究的目的是评估眼前庭诱发肌源性电位(oVEMP)、颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)和脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)的反应特征,了解有眩晕症状的女性偏头痛患者前庭功能障碍的病理机制。我们还旨在评估前庭性偏头痛(VM)中 VEMP 反应的电生理学意义。方法:本研究共纳入 23 名无先兆偏头痛(MoA)患者、23 名 VM 患者和 20 名性别与年龄匹配的健康对照组,共计 66 名女性参与者。研究结果参数包括不对称比率(ARs)、oVEMP、cVEMP、N1P1、P13N23 的振幅以及各自的潜伏期(平均值± SD)。从 BAEP 图中分析了波的绝对潜伏期和峰间间隔潜伏期:30.4%的MoA组和21.7%的VM组出现单侧或双侧cVEMP反应缺失,与对照组相比,只有MoA组的cVEMP反应缺失具有统计学意义(P=0.035)。两组的 oVEMP 反应缺失或不对称(13.1%)均无统计学意义。颈椎 VEMP P13 和 N23 潜伏期、峰-峰振幅、耳间潜伏期和振幅 AR 在 MoA 和 VM 患者与健康对照组之间没有任何显著差异。三组患者的oVEMP和BAEP参数也无明显差异:尽管与健康人相比,MoA 和 VM 患者更常见 cVEMP 反应缺失,但 VEMP 和 BAEP 测试结果不应被用于 VM 和 MoA 的鉴别诊断。
Vestibular evoked myogenic and auditory brainstem evoked potentials in a female migraine population.
Background and purpose:
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) response characteristics and to understand the pathophysiology of vestibular dysfunction in female migraineurs with vertigo symptoms. We also aimed to assess the electrophysiological diagnostic significance of the VEMP responses in vestibular migraine (VM).
.
Methods:
23 patients with migraine without aura (MoA), 23 patients with VM, and 20 sex-and age-matched healthy controls, a total of 66 female participants were enrolled in this study. The outcome parameters were asymmetry ratios (ARs), amplitudes of oVEMP, cVEMP, N1P1, P13N23, and the respective latencies (mean ± SD). From the BAEP graphs, absolute and interpeak interval latencies of waves were analyzed.
.
Results:
30.4% of the MoA group and 21.7% of the VM group had uni- or bilaterally absent cVEMP responses which were statistically significant only in the MoA group (p=0.035) in comparison to control group. Both groups displayed statistically insignificant absent or asymmetrical responses for oVEMP (13.1%). Cervical VEMP P13 and N23 latency, peak-to-peak amplitude, interaural latencies, and amplitude ARs did not show any significant difference between MoA and VM patients and healthy controls. No significant difference was detected among the three groups in the oVEMP and BAEP parameters.
.
Conclusion:
Although absent cVEMP responses were more common in MoA and VM patients than in healthy individuals, the VEMP and BAEP test results should not be used in the differential diagnosis of VM and MoA.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.