公共卫生危机期间集中家庭声音:卫生合作和社区保健系统的挑战和机遇。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000865
Angeline K Spain, Angela Garza, Julie S McCrae
{"title":"公共卫生危机期间集中家庭声音:卫生合作和社区保健系统的挑战和机遇。","authors":"Angeline K Spain, Angela Garza, Julie S McCrae","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence is lacking about how to integrate family and community voice into systems of care. This is particularly relevant in public health crises when reducing barriers to health care and resources is critical for everyone, but especially community members who typically experience more barriers to care. Addressing this gap, this study investigated the voice strategies used by systems of care to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews in three U.S. counties with agency leaders representing healthcare, public health, and early childhood partners in local systems of care (<i>n</i> = 15) and resource navigators who worked with families (<i>n</i> = 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that systems of care were better able to identify and respond to family priorities when they used diverse voice strategies, implemented among multiple agencies involved and at multiple time points. Family and community voice helped uncover blind spots in the crisis response, facilitating reaching more individuals in need. Flexibility in safety net service policies and protocols was critical to each organization in the system of care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Systems of care that develop a multi-dimensional approach to voice strategies that can be readily mobilized in a public health crisis will be more apt to meet emerging needs. Questions remain about whether power sharing that occurred in the context of crisis translates into reform that builds out from family priorities. Common issues to meeting family needs that could be addressed prior to a crisis included outdated resource lists, confusing application processes, poorly translated materials, and insufficient broadband access. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centering family voice during a public health crisis: Challenge and opportunity for health collaborations and community systems of care.\",\"authors\":\"Angeline K Spain, Angela Garza, Julie S McCrae\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence is lacking about how to integrate family and community voice into systems of care. This is particularly relevant in public health crises when reducing barriers to health care and resources is critical for everyone, but especially community members who typically experience more barriers to care. Addressing this gap, this study investigated the voice strategies used by systems of care to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews in three U.S. counties with agency leaders representing healthcare, public health, and early childhood partners in local systems of care (<i>n</i> = 15) and resource navigators who worked with families (<i>n</i> = 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that systems of care were better able to identify and respond to family priorities when they used diverse voice strategies, implemented among multiple agencies involved and at multiple time points. Family and community voice helped uncover blind spots in the crisis response, facilitating reaching more individuals in need. Flexibility in safety net service policies and protocols was critical to each organization in the system of care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Systems of care that develop a multi-dimensional approach to voice strategies that can be readily mobilized in a public health crisis will be more apt to meet emerging needs. Questions remain about whether power sharing that occurred in the context of crisis translates into reform that builds out from family priorities. Common issues to meeting family needs that could be addressed prior to a crisis included outdated resource lists, confusing application processes, poorly translated materials, and insufficient broadband access. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000865\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于如何将家庭和社区的声音纳入护理系统,目前缺乏证据。这在公共卫生危机中尤其重要,因为减少获得卫生保健和资源的障碍对每个人都至关重要,特别是对通常面临更多卫生保健障碍的社区成员。为了解决这一差距,本研究调查了医疗系统用于应对COVID-19大流行的语音策略。方法:我们在美国的三个县进行了半结构化访谈,访谈对象是代表当地医疗保健系统、公共卫生系统和幼儿合作伙伴的机构领导(n = 15)和与家庭合作的资源导航员(n = 4)。结果:我们发现,当护理系统使用不同的语音策略,在多个涉及的机构和多个时间点实施时,他们能够更好地识别和响应家庭优先事项。家庭和社区的声音有助于发现危机应对中的盲点,促进向更多有需要的人提供帮助。安全网服务政策和协议的灵活性对护理系统中的每个组织都至关重要。讨论:制定可在公共卫生危机中随时动员的多维策略的保健系统将更容易满足新出现的需求。在危机背景下发生的权力分享是否会转化为以家庭优先为基础的改革,问题仍然存在。可以在危机发生前解决的满足家庭需求的常见问题包括过时的资源清单、令人困惑的申请流程、翻译不当的材料以及宽带接入不足。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Centering family voice during a public health crisis: Challenge and opportunity for health collaborations and community systems of care.

Introduction: Evidence is lacking about how to integrate family and community voice into systems of care. This is particularly relevant in public health crises when reducing barriers to health care and resources is critical for everyone, but especially community members who typically experience more barriers to care. Addressing this gap, this study investigated the voice strategies used by systems of care to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews in three U.S. counties with agency leaders representing healthcare, public health, and early childhood partners in local systems of care (n = 15) and resource navigators who worked with families (n = 4).

Results: We found that systems of care were better able to identify and respond to family priorities when they used diverse voice strategies, implemented among multiple agencies involved and at multiple time points. Family and community voice helped uncover blind spots in the crisis response, facilitating reaching more individuals in need. Flexibility in safety net service policies and protocols was critical to each organization in the system of care.

Discussion: Systems of care that develop a multi-dimensional approach to voice strategies that can be readily mobilized in a public health crisis will be more apt to meet emerging needs. Questions remain about whether power sharing that occurred in the context of crisis translates into reform that builds out from family priorities. Common issues to meeting family needs that could be addressed prior to a crisis included outdated resource lists, confusing application processes, poorly translated materials, and insufficient broadband access. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a diabetes education program on family members' attitudes toward diabetes. Using virtual simulation to teach substance use screening and brief intervention skills across the health professions: Examining training outcomes among an interprofessional graduate student sample. Family functioning and the implications for adult weight management. Establishing an accountability benchmark for equity, diversity, and inclusion: A 10-year scoping review of Families, Systems, & Health. Factors leading to patient disengagement for unknown reasons in virtual collaborative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1