两党动员的力量:冠状病毒大流行期间突尼斯女权运动的成功

Maro Youssef, Sarah Yerkes
{"title":"两党动员的力量:冠状病毒大流行期间突尼斯女权运动的成功","authors":"Maro Youssef, Sarah Yerkes","doi":"10.1163/18763375-14011296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Tunisian government, which is deeply divided, especially along ideological lines, responded to growing concerns over increased violence against women during the Coronavirus pandemic by establishing a new domestic violence shelter and 24/7 hotline. This article asks: <em>Why did the state respond to gender-based violence</em>(<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\"><em>gbv</em></span><em>) concerns during the Coronavirus pandemic in Tunisia, despite ideological and political divisions?</em> We argue that the state addressed some concerns around violence during the pandemic because combatting <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">gbv</span> has bipartisan support in Tunisia. Tunisian Islamist and secularist women’s rights organizations succeeded in building a bipartisan coalition of support on this issue because they worked either together in a short-lived coalition or in tandem with similar goals over the past decade during the democratic transition in Tunisia. Building on the existing coalition literature, we show that feminist coalition formation before a pandemic has implications for feminists’ success in times of crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":43500,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Law and Governance","volume":"531 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Power of Bipartisan Mobilization: The Success of Tunisia’s Feminist Movement During the Coronavirus Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Maro Youssef, Sarah Yerkes\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18763375-14011296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Tunisian government, which is deeply divided, especially along ideological lines, responded to growing concerns over increased violence against women during the Coronavirus pandemic by establishing a new domestic violence shelter and 24/7 hotline. This article asks: <em>Why did the state respond to gender-based violence</em>(<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\"><em>gbv</em></span><em>) concerns during the Coronavirus pandemic in Tunisia, despite ideological and political divisions?</em> We argue that the state addressed some concerns around violence during the pandemic because combatting <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">gbv</span> has bipartisan support in Tunisia. Tunisian Islamist and secularist women’s rights organizations succeeded in building a bipartisan coalition of support on this issue because they worked either together in a short-lived coalition or in tandem with similar goals over the past decade during the democratic transition in Tunisia. Building on the existing coalition literature, we show that feminist coalition formation before a pandemic has implications for feminists’ success in times of crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Law and Governance\",\"volume\":\"531 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Law and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18763375-14011296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18763375-14011296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

突尼斯政府内部存在严重分歧,特别是在意识形态方面存在分歧。突尼斯政府通过建立新的家庭暴力庇护所和24/7热线,回应了人们对冠状病毒大流行期间暴力侵害妇女行为增加的担忧。本文的问题是:尽管意识形态和政治上存在分歧,但在突尼斯冠状病毒大流行期间,为什么国家对基于性别的暴力(gbv)的担忧做出了回应?我们认为,国家在疫情期间解决了对暴力的一些担忧,因为打击性别暴力在突尼斯得到了两党的支持。突尼斯的伊斯兰主义者和世俗主义妇女权利组织成功地在这个问题上建立了一个两党支持的联盟,因为他们要么在一个短暂的联盟中合作,要么在过去十年突尼斯民主转型期间为类似的目标而合作。在现有联盟文献的基础上,我们表明,在大流行之前形成的女权主义联盟对女权主义者在危机时期的成功具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Power of Bipartisan Mobilization: The Success of Tunisia’s Feminist Movement During the Coronavirus Pandemic

The Tunisian government, which is deeply divided, especially along ideological lines, responded to growing concerns over increased violence against women during the Coronavirus pandemic by establishing a new domestic violence shelter and 24/7 hotline. This article asks: Why did the state respond to gender-based violence(gbv) concerns during the Coronavirus pandemic in Tunisia, despite ideological and political divisions? We argue that the state addressed some concerns around violence during the pandemic because combatting gbv has bipartisan support in Tunisia. Tunisian Islamist and secularist women’s rights organizations succeeded in building a bipartisan coalition of support on this issue because they worked either together in a short-lived coalition or in tandem with similar goals over the past decade during the democratic transition in Tunisia. Building on the existing coalition literature, we show that feminist coalition formation before a pandemic has implications for feminists’ success in times of crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The aim of MELG is to provide a peer-reviewed venue for academic analysis in which the legal lens allows scholars and practitioners to address issues of compelling concern to the Middle East. The journal is multi-disciplinary – offering contributors from a wide range of backgrounds an opportunity to discuss issues of governance, jurisprudence, and socio-political organization, thereby promoting a common conceptual framework and vocabulary for exchanging ideas across boundaries – geographic and otherwise. It is also broad in scope, discussing issues of critical importance to the Middle East without treating the region as a self-contained unit.
期刊最新文献
Lebanon’s ‘Concomitant Crises’ and Consociationalism as a Leading Form of Conflict Management Lebanon’s Endemic Power-Sharing Dilemmas and their Manifestation in the Beirut Blast NGOization and Politicization of Aid Protesting Power-Sharing: Placing the Thawra in Recent Waves of Contentious Politics “We are the Revolution, Abroad”: Diaspora Protests, Identity Construction, and the Remaking of Citizenship in the 2019 Lebanese Thawra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1