谁占用了IPv4地址?

IF 2.2 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594255.3594260
Loqman Salamatian, Todd Arnold, Ítalo Cunha, Jiangchen Zhu, Yunfan Zhang, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Matt Calder
{"title":"谁占用了IPv4地址?","authors":"Loqman Salamatian, Todd Arnold, Ítalo Cunha, Jiangchen Zhu, Yunfan Zhang, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Matt Calder","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594255.3594260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To mitigate IPv4 exhaustion, IPv6 provides expanded address space, and NAT allows a single public IPv4 address to suffice for many devices assigned private IPv4 address space. Even though NAT has greatly extended the shelf-life of IPv4, some networks need more private IPv4 space than what is officially allocated by IANA due to their size and/or network management practices. Some of these networks resort to using <i>squat space</i>, a term the network operations community uses for large public IPv4 address blocks allocated to organizations but historically never announced to the Internet. While squatting of IP addresses is an open secret, it introduces ethical, legal, and technical problems. In this work we examine billions of traceroutes to identify thousands of organizations squatting. We examine how they are using it and what happened when the US Department of Defense suddenly started announcing what had traditionally been squat space. In addition to shining light on a dirty secret of operational practices, our paper shows that squatting distorts common Internet measurement methodologies, which we argue have to be re-examined to account for squat space.</p>","PeriodicalId":50646,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review","volume":"378 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Squats IPv4 Addresses?\",\"authors\":\"Loqman Salamatian, Todd Arnold, Ítalo Cunha, Jiangchen Zhu, Yunfan Zhang, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Matt Calder\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594255.3594260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To mitigate IPv4 exhaustion, IPv6 provides expanded address space, and NAT allows a single public IPv4 address to suffice for many devices assigned private IPv4 address space. Even though NAT has greatly extended the shelf-life of IPv4, some networks need more private IPv4 space than what is officially allocated by IANA due to their size and/or network management practices. Some of these networks resort to using <i>squat space</i>, a term the network operations community uses for large public IPv4 address blocks allocated to organizations but historically never announced to the Internet. While squatting of IP addresses is an open secret, it introduces ethical, legal, and technical problems. In this work we examine billions of traceroutes to identify thousands of organizations squatting. We examine how they are using it and what happened when the US Department of Defense suddenly started announcing what had traditionally been squat space. In addition to shining light on a dirty secret of operational practices, our paper shows that squatting distorts common Internet measurement methodologies, which we argue have to be re-examined to account for squat space.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review\",\"volume\":\"378 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594255.3594260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594255.3594260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了缓解IPv4地址的枯竭,IPv6提供了扩展的地址空间,而NAT允许单个公网IPv4地址满足多个分配私有IPv4地址空间的设备。尽管NAT极大地延长了IPv4的保质期,但由于网络的规模和/或网络管理实践,一些网络需要比IANA官方分配的更多的私有IPv4空间。其中一些网络诉诸于使用“蹲下空间”(蹲下空间),这是网络运营社区使用的一个术语,指的是分配给组织但从未向互联网公布的大型公共IPv4地址块。虽然占用IP地址是一个公开的秘密,但它会带来道德、法律和技术问题。在这项工作中,我们检查了数十亿条跟踪路由,以确定数千个组织的非法占用。我们来看看他们是如何使用它的,以及当美国国防部突然开始宣布传统上的蹲点空间时发生了什么。除了揭露操作实践的肮脏秘密外,我们的论文还表明,蹲下扭曲了常见的互联网测量方法,我们认为必须重新检查这些方法以解释蹲下空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Squats IPv4 Addresses?

To mitigate IPv4 exhaustion, IPv6 provides expanded address space, and NAT allows a single public IPv4 address to suffice for many devices assigned private IPv4 address space. Even though NAT has greatly extended the shelf-life of IPv4, some networks need more private IPv4 space than what is officially allocated by IANA due to their size and/or network management practices. Some of these networks resort to using squat space, a term the network operations community uses for large public IPv4 address blocks allocated to organizations but historically never announced to the Internet. While squatting of IP addresses is an open secret, it introduces ethical, legal, and technical problems. In this work we examine billions of traceroutes to identify thousands of organizations squatting. We examine how they are using it and what happened when the US Department of Defense suddenly started announcing what had traditionally been squat space. In addition to shining light on a dirty secret of operational practices, our paper shows that squatting distorts common Internet measurement methodologies, which we argue have to be re-examined to account for squat space.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review
ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Communication Review (CCR) is an online publication of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM) and publishes articles on topics within the SIG''s field of interest. Technical papers accepted to CCR typically report on practical advances or the practical applications of theoretical advances. CCR serves as a forum for interesting and novel ideas at an early stage in their development. The focus is on timely dissemination of new ideas that may help trigger additional investigations. While the innovation and timeliness are the major criteria for its acceptance, technical robustness and readability will also be considered in the review process. We particularly encourage papers with early evaluation or feasibility studies.
期刊最新文献
The I/O Driven Server: From SmartNICs to Data Movement Controllers On Integrating eBPF into Pluginized Protocols Can We Save the Public Internet? The October 2023 Issue Recent Trends on Privacy-Preserving Technologies under Standardization at the IETF
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1