互文探究与解释性创造:蒲柏。威廉·威尔斯·布朗《越狱》的实验舞台

Ilka Saal
{"title":"互文探究与解释性创造:蒲柏。威廉·威尔斯·布朗《越狱》的实验舞台","authors":"Ilka Saal","doi":"10.1515/jcde-2023-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution discusses Pope.L’s 2018 provocative restaging of William Wells Brown’s anti-slavery play <jats:italic>The Escape: Or, A Leap of Freedom</jats:italic> (1858) at the Art Institute of Chicago. Drawing on Linda Hutcheon’s theory of adaptation, it argues against a source-oriented assessment of the production, which would prioritize the original over its interpretation and delimit aesthetic evaluation to questions of fidelity. It proposes to consider <jats:italic>Pope.L: The Escape</jats:italic> as an interpretive creation in its own right. Engaging in a complex intertextual and intercultural dialogue with its antetext, Pope.L’s staging brings into focus particular aspects of the contemporary moment. While Brown’s play presents race as first and foremost a performative category and stresses the possibility of autopoiesis qua performance, Pope.L reduces slavery to an ontological condition. Its title and manifold multimedia performances notwithstanding, there is no escape from enslavement in <jats:italic>Pope.L: The Escape</jats:italic>. Performance remains contained in and prescribed by an ongoing condition of physical and psychic enslavement. With this radical adaptation, Pope.L responds to what Paul Gilroy identifies as the “ontological turn” in recent Black thought. In light of the ongoing structural and quotidian violence against People of Color, this approach insists on the central significance of the bodily experience of racializing attributions for understanding social relations as well as Black collectivity. It also provocatively asks whether the performative does indeed suffice to unsettle the structural coordinates of anti-Blackness that continue to impact and overdetermine contemporary lives.","PeriodicalId":41187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English","volume":"200 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intertextual Inquiry and Interpretive Creation: Pope.L’s Experimental Staging of William Wells Brown’s The Escape\",\"authors\":\"Ilka Saal\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jcde-2023-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution discusses Pope.L’s 2018 provocative restaging of William Wells Brown’s anti-slavery play <jats:italic>The Escape: Or, A Leap of Freedom</jats:italic> (1858) at the Art Institute of Chicago. Drawing on Linda Hutcheon’s theory of adaptation, it argues against a source-oriented assessment of the production, which would prioritize the original over its interpretation and delimit aesthetic evaluation to questions of fidelity. It proposes to consider <jats:italic>Pope.L: The Escape</jats:italic> as an interpretive creation in its own right. Engaging in a complex intertextual and intercultural dialogue with its antetext, Pope.L’s staging brings into focus particular aspects of the contemporary moment. While Brown’s play presents race as first and foremost a performative category and stresses the possibility of autopoiesis qua performance, Pope.L reduces slavery to an ontological condition. Its title and manifold multimedia performances notwithstanding, there is no escape from enslavement in <jats:italic>Pope.L: The Escape</jats:italic>. Performance remains contained in and prescribed by an ongoing condition of physical and psychic enslavement. With this radical adaptation, Pope.L responds to what Paul Gilroy identifies as the “ontological turn” in recent Black thought. In light of the ongoing structural and quotidian violence against People of Color, this approach insists on the central significance of the bodily experience of racializing attributions for understanding social relations as well as Black collectivity. It also provocatively asks whether the performative does indeed suffice to unsettle the structural coordinates of anti-Blackness that continue to impact and overdetermine contemporary lives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2023-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2023-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了Pope。L 2018年在芝加哥艺术学院重新演绎威廉·威尔斯·布朗(William Wells Brown)的反奴隶制戏剧《逃跑:或者,自由的飞跃》(1858年)。借鉴琳达·哈钦的改编理论,它反对对作品进行以来源为导向的评估,这种评估会优先考虑原作而不是对原作的解释,并将审美评价限定在保真度的问题上。它建议考虑蒲柏。L:《越狱》本身就是一部解释性的作品。与前文教皇进行复杂的互文和跨文化对话。L的舞台剧突出了当代的某些方面。布朗的戏剧将种族首先呈现为一个表演范畴,并强调了作为表演的自我创生的可能性。L将奴役化简为一种本体论条件。尽管它的名字和多种多媒体表演,但在《教皇》中没有逃脱奴役。L: Escape。表演仍然包含在一种持续的身体和精神奴役状态中。通过这种激进的适应,波普。L回应了保罗·吉尔罗伊(Paul Gilroy)所说的近期黑人思想中的“本体论转向”。鉴于针对有色人种的持续的结构性和日常暴力,这种方法坚持种族化归因的身体体验对于理解社会关系和黑人集体的中心意义。它还提出了一个具有挑衅性的问题,即表演是否确实足以动摇反黑人的结构坐标,这种结构坐标继续影响和过度决定当代生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intertextual Inquiry and Interpretive Creation: Pope.L’s Experimental Staging of William Wells Brown’s The Escape
This contribution discusses Pope.L’s 2018 provocative restaging of William Wells Brown’s anti-slavery play The Escape: Or, A Leap of Freedom (1858) at the Art Institute of Chicago. Drawing on Linda Hutcheon’s theory of adaptation, it argues against a source-oriented assessment of the production, which would prioritize the original over its interpretation and delimit aesthetic evaluation to questions of fidelity. It proposes to consider Pope.L: The Escape as an interpretive creation in its own right. Engaging in a complex intertextual and intercultural dialogue with its antetext, Pope.L’s staging brings into focus particular aspects of the contemporary moment. While Brown’s play presents race as first and foremost a performative category and stresses the possibility of autopoiesis qua performance, Pope.L reduces slavery to an ontological condition. Its title and manifold multimedia performances notwithstanding, there is no escape from enslavement in Pope.L: The Escape. Performance remains contained in and prescribed by an ongoing condition of physical and psychic enslavement. With this radical adaptation, Pope.L responds to what Paul Gilroy identifies as the “ontological turn” in recent Black thought. In light of the ongoing structural and quotidian violence against People of Color, this approach insists on the central significance of the bodily experience of racializing attributions for understanding social relations as well as Black collectivity. It also provocatively asks whether the performative does indeed suffice to unsettle the structural coordinates of anti-Blackness that continue to impact and overdetermine contemporary lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Intertextual Inquiry and Interpretive Creation: Pope.L’s Experimental Staging of William Wells Brown’s The Escape Creative Interpretation and the Politics of Failure “They Think We’re Foul-Mouthed Sluts”: Discomfort, Bourgeois Spectatorship, and Fellow Feelings of Feminism in Patricia Cornelius’s SHIT Relations with/to the Text: Four Plays on the Move Creative Appropriations: Everyman on the Contemporary Stage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1