{"title":"哪些舒伯特品种是海森伯格品种?","authors":"Laura Escobar, Martha Precup, John Shareshian","doi":"10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>After proving that every Schubert variety in the full flag variety of a complex reductive group <i>G</i> is a general Hessenberg variety, we show that not all such Schubert varieties are adjoint Hessenberg varieties. In fact, in types A and C, we provide pattern avoidance criteria implying that the proportion of Schubert varieties that are adjoint Hessenberg varieties approaches zero as the rank of <i>G</i> increases. We show also that in type A, some Schubert varieties are not isomorphic to any adjoint Hessenberg variety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49423,"journal":{"name":"Transformation Groups","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Schubert Varieties are Hessenberg Varieties?\",\"authors\":\"Laura Escobar, Martha Precup, John Shareshian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>After proving that every Schubert variety in the full flag variety of a complex reductive group <i>G</i> is a general Hessenberg variety, we show that not all such Schubert varieties are adjoint Hessenberg varieties. In fact, in types A and C, we provide pattern avoidance criteria implying that the proportion of Schubert varieties that are adjoint Hessenberg varieties approaches zero as the rank of <i>G</i> increases. We show also that in type A, some Schubert varieties are not isomorphic to any adjoint Hessenberg variety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transformation Groups\",\"volume\":\"61 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transformation Groups\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation Groups","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-023-09825-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Which Schubert Varieties are Hessenberg Varieties?
After proving that every Schubert variety in the full flag variety of a complex reductive group G is a general Hessenberg variety, we show that not all such Schubert varieties are adjoint Hessenberg varieties. In fact, in types A and C, we provide pattern avoidance criteria implying that the proportion of Schubert varieties that are adjoint Hessenberg varieties approaches zero as the rank of G increases. We show also that in type A, some Schubert varieties are not isomorphic to any adjoint Hessenberg variety.
期刊介绍:
Transformation Groups will only accept research articles containing new results, complete Proofs, and an abstract. Topics include: Lie groups and Lie algebras; Lie transformation groups and holomorphic transformation groups; Algebraic groups; Invariant theory; Geometry and topology of homogeneous spaces; Discrete subgroups of Lie groups; Quantum groups and enveloping algebras; Group aspects of conformal field theory; Kac-Moody groups and algebras; Lie supergroups and superalgebras.