投机交易、前景理论与交易成本

IF 1.1 2区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Finance and Stochastics Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1007/s00780-022-00494-7
Alex S. L. Tse, Harry Zheng
{"title":"投机交易、前景理论与交易成本","authors":"Alex S. L. Tse, Harry Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s00780-022-00494-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A speculative agent with prospect theory preference chooses the optimal time to purchase and then to sell an indivisible risky asset to maximise the expected utility of the round-trip profit net of transaction costs. The optimisation problem is formulated as a sequential optimal stopping problem, and we provide a complete characterisation of the solution. Depending on the preference and market parameters, the optimal strategy can be “buy and hold”, “buy low, sell high”, “buy high, sell higher” or “no trading”. Behavioural preference and market friction interact in a subtle way which yields surprising implications on the agent’s trading patterns. For example, increasing the market entry fee does not necessarily curb speculative trading, but instead may induce a higher reference point under which the agent becomes more risk-seeking and in turn is more likely to trade.</p>","PeriodicalId":50447,"journal":{"name":"Finance and Stochastics","volume":"230 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speculative trading, prospect theory and transaction costs\",\"authors\":\"Alex S. L. Tse, Harry Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00780-022-00494-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A speculative agent with prospect theory preference chooses the optimal time to purchase and then to sell an indivisible risky asset to maximise the expected utility of the round-trip profit net of transaction costs. The optimisation problem is formulated as a sequential optimal stopping problem, and we provide a complete characterisation of the solution. Depending on the preference and market parameters, the optimal strategy can be “buy and hold”, “buy low, sell high”, “buy high, sell higher” or “no trading”. Behavioural preference and market friction interact in a subtle way which yields surprising implications on the agent’s trading patterns. For example, increasing the market entry fee does not necessarily curb speculative trading, but instead may induce a higher reference point under which the agent becomes more risk-seeking and in turn is more likely to trade.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance and Stochastics\",\"volume\":\"230 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance and Stochastics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-022-00494-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance and Stochastics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-022-00494-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有前景理论偏好的投机代理人选择购买和出售不可分割风险资产的最佳时间,以使交易成本的往返净利润的预期效用最大化。优化问题被表述为一个顺序最优停止问题,我们提供了解决方案的完整特征。根据偏好和市场参数的不同,最优策略可以是“买入并持有”、“低买高卖”、“高买高卖”或“不交易”。行为偏好和市场摩擦以一种微妙的方式相互作用,对代理人的交易模式产生了令人惊讶的影响。例如,增加市场准入费并不一定会抑制投机交易,反而可能导致更高的参考点,在这个参考点下,代理人变得更愿意寻求风险,从而更有可能进行交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Speculative trading, prospect theory and transaction costs

A speculative agent with prospect theory preference chooses the optimal time to purchase and then to sell an indivisible risky asset to maximise the expected utility of the round-trip profit net of transaction costs. The optimisation problem is formulated as a sequential optimal stopping problem, and we provide a complete characterisation of the solution. Depending on the preference and market parameters, the optimal strategy can be “buy and hold”, “buy low, sell high”, “buy high, sell higher” or “no trading”. Behavioural preference and market friction interact in a subtle way which yields surprising implications on the agent’s trading patterns. For example, increasing the market entry fee does not necessarily curb speculative trading, but instead may induce a higher reference point under which the agent becomes more risk-seeking and in turn is more likely to trade.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance and Stochastics
Finance and Stochastics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Finance and Stochastics is to provide a high standard publication forum for research - in all areas of finance based on stochastic methods - on specific topics in mathematics (in particular probability theory, statistics and stochastic analysis) motivated by the analysis of problems in finance. Finance and Stochastics encompasses - but is not limited to - the following fields: - theory and analysis of financial markets - continuous time finance - derivatives research - insurance in relation to finance - portfolio selection - credit and market risks - term structure models - statistical and empirical financial studies based on advanced stochastic methods - numerical and stochastic solution techniques for problems in finance - intertemporal economics, uncertainty and information in relation to finance.
期刊最新文献
On the Guyon–Lekeufack volatility model Stationary covariance regime for affine stochastic covariance models in Hilbert spaces Robustness of Hilbert space-valued stochastic volatility models A Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard model with leverage in Hilbert space for commodity forward markets Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1