讨论:“Unconsciousness-Raising”

IF 0.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS Psychoanalytic Dialogues Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1080/10481885.2023.2226033
Alexandra Woods
{"title":"讨论:“Unconsciousness-Raising”","authors":"Alexandra Woods","doi":"10.1080/10481885.2023.2226033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>In discussing Nick Malherbe’s important exploration of liberation psychology and psychoanalysis, I attempt to sharpen analysis of the oppressive impact of traditional psychology/psychoanalysis (especially so in the U.S.). I consider oppressive hierarchies of privilege within the capitalist order in which <i>all</i> institutions, movements and individuals are implicated. I draw particularly from the intersectional theories of the Black feminists of the Combahee River Collective and their successors, and I consider struggles around privilege within other activist movements like ACT UP. This exploration leads me to raise questions about Malherbe’s sharp distinction between “consciousness- raising” and “unconsciousness-raising.” I explore, and raise some questions about, Malherbe’s vivid case illustration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47032,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Dialogues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion: “Unconsciousness-Raising”\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10481885.2023.2226033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>In discussing Nick Malherbe’s important exploration of liberation psychology and psychoanalysis, I attempt to sharpen analysis of the oppressive impact of traditional psychology/psychoanalysis (especially so in the U.S.). I consider oppressive hierarchies of privilege within the capitalist order in which <i>all</i> institutions, movements and individuals are implicated. I draw particularly from the intersectional theories of the Black feminists of the Combahee River Collective and their successors, and I consider struggles around privilege within other activist movements like ACT UP. This exploration leads me to raise questions about Malherbe’s sharp distinction between “consciousness- raising” and “unconsciousness-raising.” I explore, and raise some questions about, Malherbe’s vivid case illustration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalytic Dialogues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalytic Dialogues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2023.2226033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Dialogues","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2023.2226033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在讨论尼克·马尔赫贝对解放心理学和精神分析的重要探索的同时,我试图对传统心理学/精神分析的压迫性影响(尤其是在美国)进行尖锐的分析。我考虑的是资本主义秩序中压迫性的特权等级制度,所有的机构、运动和个人都牵涉其中。我特别从Combahee River Collective的黑人女权主义者及其继承者的交叉理论中汲取灵感,我还考虑了其他激进运动中围绕特权的斗争,比如ACT UP。这种探索使我对Malherbe对“意识提升”和“无意识提升”的尖锐区分提出了疑问。我对Malherbe生动的案例进行了探索,并提出了一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discussion: “Unconsciousness-Raising”

ABSTRACT

In discussing Nick Malherbe’s important exploration of liberation psychology and psychoanalysis, I attempt to sharpen analysis of the oppressive impact of traditional psychology/psychoanalysis (especially so in the U.S.). I consider oppressive hierarchies of privilege within the capitalist order in which all institutions, movements and individuals are implicated. I draw particularly from the intersectional theories of the Black feminists of the Combahee River Collective and their successors, and I consider struggles around privilege within other activist movements like ACT UP. This exploration leads me to raise questions about Malherbe’s sharp distinction between “consciousness- raising” and “unconsciousness-raising.” I explore, and raise some questions about, Malherbe’s vivid case illustration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoanalytic Dialogues
Psychoanalytic Dialogues PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Launched in 1991, Psychoanalytic Dialogues was founded on the premise that within the diverse world of psychoanalysis there had developed a set of overlapping perspectives that regarded relational configurations of self and others, real and fantasied, as the primary units of human motivation and psychodynamic explanation. These perspectives emerged within interpersonal psychoanalysis; British objct relations theories; self psychology; the empirical traditions of infancy research and child development; and certain currents of contemporary Freudian thought. This common relational model has come to provide a vitalizing framework within which clinical contributions can be situated and developed.
期刊最新文献
Racial Rage, Racial Guilt: The Uses of Anger in Asian America Undoing the Dissociation of the Unthought Subject The Stork Dense Temporalities and Displaced Risk: Musing with Stephen About Ankle Monitor Surveillances, Skin Sanding, and Snatcheries Form, Shape, and Content of an Industrious Unconscious—Becoming with Noisy Storks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1