刚性柱支土工合成筋路堤稳定性评价

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1680/jgein.23.00070
H. Liu, Q. Luo, M. H. El Naggar, K. Liu, T. Wang
{"title":"刚性柱支土工合成筋路堤稳定性评价","authors":"H. Liu, Q. Luo, M. H. El Naggar, K. Liu, T. Wang","doi":"10.1680/jgein.23.00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field observations and centrifuge tests indicate that progressive column bending failure accompanies most instabilities of rigid column-supported and geosynthetic-reinforced (RCGR) embankments. However, recognized guidelines specifically for evaluating the overall stability of such systems featuring bending failure remain limited. This study presents a general methodology to calculate the factor of safety (<i>FS</i>) for RCGR embankments using the limit equilibrium method. The focus is on deep-seated slope failures, wherein rigid columns progressively fracture due to subsoil overstressing. The Concentric Arches model, along with tensioned geosynthetic analysis, informs the determination of vertical and horizontal loads on the column heads. The column's resisting moment stems from its flexural and compression resistance. A mobilization factor for the net thrust on each column is defined to capture the progressive failure. The methodology involves an iterative computational procedure to identify the critical slip surface and the <i>FS</i> utilising Fellenius’ method. The solution is validated against three case studies, including both centrifuge models and field tests, as well as finite element analysis. The results indicate that the soil mass contributes the most to resisting sliding and overall stability, followed by the columns and geosynthetics. In addition, axial force mainly provides the resisting moment of columns.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":"602 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating stability of rigid column-supported and geosynthetic-reinforced embankments\",\"authors\":\"H. Liu, Q. Luo, M. H. El Naggar, K. Liu, T. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgein.23.00070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Field observations and centrifuge tests indicate that progressive column bending failure accompanies most instabilities of rigid column-supported and geosynthetic-reinforced (RCGR) embankments. However, recognized guidelines specifically for evaluating the overall stability of such systems featuring bending failure remain limited. This study presents a general methodology to calculate the factor of safety (<i>FS</i>) for RCGR embankments using the limit equilibrium method. The focus is on deep-seated slope failures, wherein rigid columns progressively fracture due to subsoil overstressing. The Concentric Arches model, along with tensioned geosynthetic analysis, informs the determination of vertical and horizontal loads on the column heads. The column's resisting moment stems from its flexural and compression resistance. A mobilization factor for the net thrust on each column is defined to capture the progressive failure. The methodology involves an iterative computational procedure to identify the critical slip surface and the <i>FS</i> utilising Fellenius’ method. The solution is validated against three case studies, including both centrifuge models and field tests, as well as finite element analysis. The results indicate that the soil mass contributes the most to resisting sliding and overall stability, followed by the columns and geosynthetics. In addition, axial force mainly provides the resisting moment of columns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"volume\":\"602 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现场观察和离心试验表明,柱支撑和土工合成加固(RCGR)路堤的大多数失稳都伴随着柱的渐进式弯曲破坏。然而,公认的专门用于评估这种具有弯曲破坏的系统的整体稳定性的指南仍然有限。本文提出了用极限平衡法计算RCGR路堤安全系数的一般方法。重点是深层边坡破坏,其中刚性柱逐渐断裂,由于底土过度应力。同心拱模型,以及张拉土工合成分析,通知柱头上的垂直和水平载荷的确定。柱的抗弯矩来源于其抗弯抗压能力。定义了每个柱上净推力的动员系数,以捕获渐进破坏。该方法包括一个迭代计算程序,以确定临界滑动面和FS利用费勒纽斯的方法。该解决方案通过三个案例研究进行了验证,包括离心机模型和现场测试,以及有限元分析。结果表明,土体对抗滑和整体稳定的贡献最大,其次是柱和土工合成材料。此外,轴向力主要提供柱的阻力力矩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating stability of rigid column-supported and geosynthetic-reinforced embankments
Field observations and centrifuge tests indicate that progressive column bending failure accompanies most instabilities of rigid column-supported and geosynthetic-reinforced (RCGR) embankments. However, recognized guidelines specifically for evaluating the overall stability of such systems featuring bending failure remain limited. This study presents a general methodology to calculate the factor of safety (FS) for RCGR embankments using the limit equilibrium method. The focus is on deep-seated slope failures, wherein rigid columns progressively fracture due to subsoil overstressing. The Concentric Arches model, along with tensioned geosynthetic analysis, informs the determination of vertical and horizontal loads on the column heads. The column's resisting moment stems from its flexural and compression resistance. A mobilization factor for the net thrust on each column is defined to capture the progressive failure. The methodology involves an iterative computational procedure to identify the critical slip surface and the FS utilising Fellenius’ method. The solution is validated against three case studies, including both centrifuge models and field tests, as well as finite element analysis. The results indicate that the soil mass contributes the most to resisting sliding and overall stability, followed by the columns and geosynthetics. In addition, axial force mainly provides the resisting moment of columns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Na-CMC-amended clay: effect of mixing method on hydraulic conductivity and polymer elution A nonlinear analytical model for consolidated geotextile-encased sand columns Geotextile filters: from idealization to real behaviour (Giroud Lecture 2023) Mechanical characteristics of geogrids produced from recycled polyester Natural weathering effects of nonwoven geotextile exposed to different climate conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1