{"title":"导论:国际机构、公共治理和未来工作规则","authors":"Franz Christian Ebert,Tonia Novitz","doi":"10.1163/15723747-01701001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue takes the centenary of the International Labour Organization as an occasion to reflect on the roles of international institutions in governing labour standards. While at the time of its creation the ILO played a solitary role as the custodian of international labour standards, the culmination of various experiments with international regulation,1 the ILO today is not the only international institution seeking to exercise governance in relation to the world of work. Instead, a number of institutional actors, both at the global and regional level, have emerged in this area, including the World Bank Group, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Their activities can complement but often also compete or even conflict with those of the ILO, of which the economic and financial crisis in the Eurozone is a powerful reminder.2 Meanwhile, the ILO has been struggling to ensure consensus among its tripartite constituents in the Post-Cold War-period and continues to be subject to significant internal conflict.3 Indeed, the ILO","PeriodicalId":42966,"journal":{"name":"International Organizations Law Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: International Institutions, Public Governance and Future Regulation of Work\",\"authors\":\"Franz Christian Ebert,Tonia Novitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15723747-01701001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue takes the centenary of the International Labour Organization as an occasion to reflect on the roles of international institutions in governing labour standards. While at the time of its creation the ILO played a solitary role as the custodian of international labour standards, the culmination of various experiments with international regulation,1 the ILO today is not the only international institution seeking to exercise governance in relation to the world of work. Instead, a number of institutional actors, both at the global and regional level, have emerged in this area, including the World Bank Group, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Their activities can complement but often also compete or even conflict with those of the ILO, of which the economic and financial crisis in the Eurozone is a powerful reminder.2 Meanwhile, the ILO has been struggling to ensure consensus among its tripartite constituents in the Post-Cold War-period and continues to be subject to significant internal conflict.3 Indeed, the ILO\",\"PeriodicalId\":42966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01701001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Organizations Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01701001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: International Institutions, Public Governance and Future Regulation of Work
This special issue takes the centenary of the International Labour Organization as an occasion to reflect on the roles of international institutions in governing labour standards. While at the time of its creation the ILO played a solitary role as the custodian of international labour standards, the culmination of various experiments with international regulation,1 the ILO today is not the only international institution seeking to exercise governance in relation to the world of work. Instead, a number of institutional actors, both at the global and regional level, have emerged in this area, including the World Bank Group, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Their activities can complement but often also compete or even conflict with those of the ILO, of which the economic and financial crisis in the Eurozone is a powerful reminder.2 Meanwhile, the ILO has been struggling to ensure consensus among its tripartite constituents in the Post-Cold War-period and continues to be subject to significant internal conflict.3 Indeed, the ILO
期刊介绍:
After the Second World War in particular, the law of international organizations developed as a discipline within public international law. Separate, but not separable. The International Organizations Law Review purports to function as a discussion forum for academics and practitioners active in the field of the law of international organizations. It is based on two pillars; one is based in the world of scholarship, the other in the world of practice. In the first dimension, the Journal focuses on general developments in international institutional law.