{"title":"作为一个失传的古典主义者:从个人和学科的断裂到恢复失去的传统和寻找回归之路","authors":"Lylaah L. Bhalerao","doi":"10.1353/apa.2023.a913464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> On Being a Lapsed Classicist:<span>From Personal and Disciplinary Rupture to Restoring Lost Traditions and Finding a Way Back<sup>*</sup></span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Lylaah L. Bhalerao </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p><span>Dem tell me</span><span>Dem tell me</span><span>Wha dem want to tell me</span></p> <p><span>Bandage up me eye with me own history</span><span>Blind me to my own identity</span></p> —John Agard, <em>Checking Out Me History</em> (2004) </blockquote> <p><small>when the pandemic began</small>, I was in the penultimate term of my Bachelor's degree in Classics and moving back into my family home in London. Now, I am in the third year of my PhD in Ancient World Studies and living in New York City, having moved across the Atlantic when borders were still closed, airports were empty, and travelers were all masked. For me, these last years of communal separation have spelled a rupture from Classics and from home; but also, a return to intellectual and cultural traditions embedded in my roots. Traditions that, as has become apparent to me, have also been severed from the discipline we call \"Classics.\" Here I attempt to tell a personalized disciplinary history: using the story of my Caribbean diaspora family (largely defined by physical and cultural rupture) and how it has impacted my relationship with antiquity as a microcosm, I meditate on how Classics has intentionally created rupture between itself and intellectual traditions of color. Furthermore, I am now asking whether it is possible to return to the discipline and to restore these intellectual traditions to a position of legitimacy and esteem. <strong>[End Page 335]</strong></p> <p>I spent a lot of time over the pandemic years feeling <em>angry</em>. No doubt we were all <em>angry</em>—at the universe, governments, our own circumstances. My <em>anger</em>, however, was directed at the discipline. <em>Anger</em>. It is one of the most widely studied words in the Classics.<sup>1</sup> However, it is not an emotion to which scholars feel entitled, it is not one we admit to having—not in the rational, objective world of academia and certainly not if we are in the minority of scholars of color. Add to that being a woman, and the reputation precedes itself. My <em>anger</em> had less to do with the pandemic itself than with the racial reckoning also occurring during this time and how Classics departments, particularly in the United Kingdom, addressed their own complicity in upholding discriminatory structures and ideologies.<sup>2</sup> The pandemic simply provided the time and space for two Classics degrees' worth of <em>anger</em> to rise to the surface.</p> <p>When I first thought about rupture and return, one moment of <em>anger</em> stood out clearly: in March 2022 I was researching into Afrocentrism for a paper on reclaiming Blackness in Greek and Roman North Africa, and I had just discovered that two of the most notable contributors to Afrocentric studies of antiquity, Ivan Van Sertima and George G.M. James,<sup>3</sup> were from Guyana—where my maternal family is from and my grandparents were born. James contended that Greek philosophy was stolen from Egypt while Van Sertima emphasized the African-ness, and indeed Blackness, of Egypt. All I could feel was <em>anger</em>, followed by confusion, sadness, and a lot of questions. Why were these scholars not a part of my classical education, not even as a brief mention? Why was I allowed to believe that my cultural heritage had not meaningfully engaged with my field of study? I had spent my institutional life explaining where Guyana was—clarifying that I did not, in fact, mean Ghana—and believing that my country of origin must not have an intellectual tradition since it was so unknown. What would it have meant to me when I was undergraduate, I wondered, to know that this was not the case?</p> <p>In that moment, I teetered on the tipping point between rupture and return. It came at the end of a two-year period of rupture: I wanted to break away from the field of Classics—and so I moved across the Atlantic in search of a more critical approach, locating myself in an Ancient World Studies department. Yet, it also hurtled me down a path of rediscovering the traditions of a heritage from which I felt ruptured and which had been excluded from the field of study in...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46223,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Being a Lapsed Classicist: From Personal and Disciplinary Rupture to Restoring Lost Traditions and Finding a Way Back\",\"authors\":\"Lylaah L. Bhalerao\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/apa.2023.a913464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> On Being a Lapsed Classicist:<span>From Personal and Disciplinary Rupture to Restoring Lost Traditions and Finding a Way Back<sup>*</sup></span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Lylaah L. Bhalerao </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p><span>Dem tell me</span><span>Dem tell me</span><span>Wha dem want to tell me</span></p> <p><span>Bandage up me eye with me own history</span><span>Blind me to my own identity</span></p> —John Agard, <em>Checking Out Me History</em> (2004) </blockquote> <p><small>when the pandemic began</small>, I was in the penultimate term of my Bachelor's degree in Classics and moving back into my family home in London. Now, I am in the third year of my PhD in Ancient World Studies and living in New York City, having moved across the Atlantic when borders were still closed, airports were empty, and travelers were all masked. For me, these last years of communal separation have spelled a rupture from Classics and from home; but also, a return to intellectual and cultural traditions embedded in my roots. Traditions that, as has become apparent to me, have also been severed from the discipline we call \\\"Classics.\\\" Here I attempt to tell a personalized disciplinary history: using the story of my Caribbean diaspora family (largely defined by physical and cultural rupture) and how it has impacted my relationship with antiquity as a microcosm, I meditate on how Classics has intentionally created rupture between itself and intellectual traditions of color. Furthermore, I am now asking whether it is possible to return to the discipline and to restore these intellectual traditions to a position of legitimacy and esteem. <strong>[End Page 335]</strong></p> <p>I spent a lot of time over the pandemic years feeling <em>angry</em>. No doubt we were all <em>angry</em>—at the universe, governments, our own circumstances. My <em>anger</em>, however, was directed at the discipline. <em>Anger</em>. It is one of the most widely studied words in the Classics.<sup>1</sup> However, it is not an emotion to which scholars feel entitled, it is not one we admit to having—not in the rational, objective world of academia and certainly not if we are in the minority of scholars of color. Add to that being a woman, and the reputation precedes itself. My <em>anger</em> had less to do with the pandemic itself than with the racial reckoning also occurring during this time and how Classics departments, particularly in the United Kingdom, addressed their own complicity in upholding discriminatory structures and ideologies.<sup>2</sup> The pandemic simply provided the time and space for two Classics degrees' worth of <em>anger</em> to rise to the surface.</p> <p>When I first thought about rupture and return, one moment of <em>anger</em> stood out clearly: in March 2022 I was researching into Afrocentrism for a paper on reclaiming Blackness in Greek and Roman North Africa, and I had just discovered that two of the most notable contributors to Afrocentric studies of antiquity, Ivan Van Sertima and George G.M. James,<sup>3</sup> were from Guyana—where my maternal family is from and my grandparents were born. James contended that Greek philosophy was stolen from Egypt while Van Sertima emphasized the African-ness, and indeed Blackness, of Egypt. All I could feel was <em>anger</em>, followed by confusion, sadness, and a lot of questions. Why were these scholars not a part of my classical education, not even as a brief mention? Why was I allowed to believe that my cultural heritage had not meaningfully engaged with my field of study? I had spent my institutional life explaining where Guyana was—clarifying that I did not, in fact, mean Ghana—and believing that my country of origin must not have an intellectual tradition since it was so unknown. What would it have meant to me when I was undergraduate, I wondered, to know that this was not the case?</p> <p>In that moment, I teetered on the tipping point between rupture and return. It came at the end of a two-year period of rupture: I wanted to break away from the field of Classics—and so I moved across the Atlantic in search of a more critical approach, locating myself in an Ancient World Studies department. Yet, it also hurtled me down a path of rediscovering the traditions of a heritage from which I felt ruptured and which had been excluded from the field of study in...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2023.a913464\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2023.a913464","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这里是内容的一个简短摘录,而不是摘要:作为一个失传的古典主义者:从个人和纪律的断裂到恢复失去的传统和找到回去的路*莱拉·l·巴莱奥(Lylaah L. Bhalerao)他们告诉我,他们告诉我,他们想告诉我什么,用我自己的历史给我包扎眼睛,让我看不到自己的身份——约翰·阿加德,《检查我的历史》(2004)当大流行开始时,我正在学习古典文学学士学位的第二个学期,正要搬回伦敦的家。现在,我在攻读古代世界研究博士学位的第三年,住在纽约市,跨过大西洋来到这里时,边境还没有关闭,机场空无一人,旅客们都戴着面具。对我来说,最近几年的集体分离意味着我与经典和家庭的决裂;但同时也是对根植于我的思想和文化传统的回归。在我看来,这些传统也已经从我们称之为“经典”的学科中分离出来了。在这里,我试图讲述一段个性化的学科历史:用我的加勒比移民家庭的故事(主要是由物质和文化的破裂来定义的),以及它如何影响我与古代作为一个缩影的关系,我思考经典是如何故意在它自己和有色人种的知识传统之间制造断裂的。此外,我现在要问的是,是否有可能回到这门学科,并将这些知识传统恢复到合法和受人尊重的地位。在流感大流行的几年里,我花了很多时间感到愤怒。毫无疑问,我们都很愤怒——对宇宙,对政府,对我们自己的处境。然而,我的愤怒是针对纪律的。愤怒。然而,这并不是学者们认为有资格拥有的一种情感,也不是我们承认拥有的一种情感——在理性、客观的学术界不是这样,如果我们是少数有色人种的学者,当然也不是这样。再加上作为一个女人,名声是第一位的。我的愤怒与其说是与流行病本身有关,不如说是与当时发生的种族清算有关,以及古典文学院系(尤其是英国的古典文学院系)如何解决自己在维护歧视性结构和意识形态方面的共谋问题这场大流行只是提供了时间和空间,让两个经典学位的愤怒浮出水面。当我第一次想到断裂和回归的时候,有一个愤怒的时刻很明显:2022年3月,我正在为一篇关于在希腊和罗马北非重新认识黑人的论文研究非洲中心主义,我刚刚发现,非洲中心主义研究中最著名的两位贡献者,伊万·范·塞尔蒂马和乔治·G.M.詹姆斯,来自圭亚那——我的母系和祖父母的出生地。詹姆斯认为希腊哲学是从埃及偷来的,而范·塞尔蒂玛则强调埃及的非洲性,实际上是黑人性。我能感觉到的只有愤怒,接着是困惑、悲伤和许多问题。为什么这些学者没有成为我古典教育的一部分,甚至没有作为一个简短的提及?为什么我可以相信我的文化遗产对我的研究领域没有意义?我一直在解释圭亚那在哪里——澄清我实际上指的不是加纳——并相信我的原籍国肯定没有知识传统,因为它太不为人知了。我想知道,当我还是本科生的时候,如果知道事实并非如此,那对我来说意味着什么?在那一刻,我在破裂和回归之间的临界点上摇摇欲坠。它是在两年的决裂期结束时出现的:我想要脱离古典学领域——所以我越过大西洋去寻找一种更批判性的方法,把自己定位在古代世界研究系。然而,它也让我走上了一条重新发现传统的道路,我感到与传统决裂,被排除在研究领域之外……
On Being a Lapsed Classicist: From Personal and Disciplinary Rupture to Restoring Lost Traditions and Finding a Way Back
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
On Being a Lapsed Classicist:From Personal and Disciplinary Rupture to Restoring Lost Traditions and Finding a Way Back*
Lylaah L. Bhalerao
Dem tell meDem tell meWha dem want to tell me
Bandage up me eye with me own historyBlind me to my own identity
—John Agard, Checking Out Me History (2004)
when the pandemic began, I was in the penultimate term of my Bachelor's degree in Classics and moving back into my family home in London. Now, I am in the third year of my PhD in Ancient World Studies and living in New York City, having moved across the Atlantic when borders were still closed, airports were empty, and travelers were all masked. For me, these last years of communal separation have spelled a rupture from Classics and from home; but also, a return to intellectual and cultural traditions embedded in my roots. Traditions that, as has become apparent to me, have also been severed from the discipline we call "Classics." Here I attempt to tell a personalized disciplinary history: using the story of my Caribbean diaspora family (largely defined by physical and cultural rupture) and how it has impacted my relationship with antiquity as a microcosm, I meditate on how Classics has intentionally created rupture between itself and intellectual traditions of color. Furthermore, I am now asking whether it is possible to return to the discipline and to restore these intellectual traditions to a position of legitimacy and esteem. [End Page 335]
I spent a lot of time over the pandemic years feeling angry. No doubt we were all angry—at the universe, governments, our own circumstances. My anger, however, was directed at the discipline. Anger. It is one of the most widely studied words in the Classics.1 However, it is not an emotion to which scholars feel entitled, it is not one we admit to having—not in the rational, objective world of academia and certainly not if we are in the minority of scholars of color. Add to that being a woman, and the reputation precedes itself. My anger had less to do with the pandemic itself than with the racial reckoning also occurring during this time and how Classics departments, particularly in the United Kingdom, addressed their own complicity in upholding discriminatory structures and ideologies.2 The pandemic simply provided the time and space for two Classics degrees' worth of anger to rise to the surface.
When I first thought about rupture and return, one moment of anger stood out clearly: in March 2022 I was researching into Afrocentrism for a paper on reclaiming Blackness in Greek and Roman North Africa, and I had just discovered that two of the most notable contributors to Afrocentric studies of antiquity, Ivan Van Sertima and George G.M. James,3 were from Guyana—where my maternal family is from and my grandparents were born. James contended that Greek philosophy was stolen from Egypt while Van Sertima emphasized the African-ness, and indeed Blackness, of Egypt. All I could feel was anger, followed by confusion, sadness, and a lot of questions. Why were these scholars not a part of my classical education, not even as a brief mention? Why was I allowed to believe that my cultural heritage had not meaningfully engaged with my field of study? I had spent my institutional life explaining where Guyana was—clarifying that I did not, in fact, mean Ghana—and believing that my country of origin must not have an intellectual tradition since it was so unknown. What would it have meant to me when I was undergraduate, I wondered, to know that this was not the case?
In that moment, I teetered on the tipping point between rupture and return. It came at the end of a two-year period of rupture: I wanted to break away from the field of Classics—and so I moved across the Atlantic in search of a more critical approach, locating myself in an Ancient World Studies department. Yet, it also hurtled me down a path of rediscovering the traditions of a heritage from which I felt ruptured and which had been excluded from the field of study in...
期刊介绍:
Transactions of the APA (TAPA) is the official research publication of the American Philological Association. TAPA reflects the wide range and high quality of research currently undertaken by classicists. Highlights of every issue include: The Presidential Address from the previous year"s conference and Paragraphoi a reflection on the material and response to issues raised in the issue.