推进成人在线课程可用性评估的社会技术-教学启发式

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Online Learning Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.24059/olj.v25i4.2439
Isa Jahnke,Nathan Riedel,Kanupriya Singh,Joi Moore
{"title":"推进成人在线课程可用性评估的社会技术-教学启发式","authors":"Isa Jahnke,Nathan Riedel,Kanupriya Singh,Joi Moore","doi":"10.24059/olj.v25i4.2439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online courses often include interface designs that do not support a positive learner experience. Literature shows a variety of heuristics to detect issues of online courses. While heuristic-based inspection of usability is a dominant method for evaluating digital systems, these methods cannot be easily transferred to online courses. To close this gap, we identified an initial set of social, technical, and pedagogical related items (STP) heuristics based on literature. Next, we analyzed this set using empirical data from two online courses. In total, we analyzed 195 problems with the goal to substantiate a final set of 14 STP heuristics. This new set allows for efficiently evaluating online courses by supporting evaluators and instructional designers in uncovering the most crucial issues and improving the learner experience. Finally, based on this work, we discuss a definition of learner experience for the emerging field of learner experience design and research. ","PeriodicalId":54195,"journal":{"name":"Online Learning","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Sociotechnical-Pedagogical Heuristics for the Usability Evaluation of Online Courses for Adult Learners\",\"authors\":\"Isa Jahnke,Nathan Riedel,Kanupriya Singh,Joi Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.24059/olj.v25i4.2439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online courses often include interface designs that do not support a positive learner experience. Literature shows a variety of heuristics to detect issues of online courses. While heuristic-based inspection of usability is a dominant method for evaluating digital systems, these methods cannot be easily transferred to online courses. To close this gap, we identified an initial set of social, technical, and pedagogical related items (STP) heuristics based on literature. Next, we analyzed this set using empirical data from two online courses. In total, we analyzed 195 problems with the goal to substantiate a final set of 14 STP heuristics. This new set allows for efficiently evaluating online courses by supporting evaluators and instructional designers in uncovering the most crucial issues and improving the learner experience. Finally, based on this work, we discuss a definition of learner experience for the emerging field of learner experience design and research. \",\"PeriodicalId\":54195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Learning\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线课程通常包括不支持积极的学习者体验的界面设计。文献展示了各种启发式方法来检测在线课程的问题。虽然基于启发式的可用性检查是评估数字系统的主要方法,但这些方法不能轻易转移到在线课程中。为了缩小这一差距,我们根据文献确定了一组初始的社会、技术和教学相关项目(STP)启发式方法。接下来,我们使用两个在线课程的经验数据来分析这个集合。总的来说,我们分析了195个问题,目标是证实14个STP启发式的最终集合。这套新标准允许通过支持评估人员和教学设计师发现最关键的问题和改善学习者体验来有效地评估在线课程。最后,在此基础上,针对学习者体验设计与研究这一新兴领域,探讨了学习者体验的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing Sociotechnical-Pedagogical Heuristics for the Usability Evaluation of Online Courses for Adult Learners
Online courses often include interface designs that do not support a positive learner experience. Literature shows a variety of heuristics to detect issues of online courses. While heuristic-based inspection of usability is a dominant method for evaluating digital systems, these methods cannot be easily transferred to online courses. To close this gap, we identified an initial set of social, technical, and pedagogical related items (STP) heuristics based on literature. Next, we analyzed this set using empirical data from two online courses. In total, we analyzed 195 problems with the goal to substantiate a final set of 14 STP heuristics. This new set allows for efficiently evaluating online courses by supporting evaluators and instructional designers in uncovering the most crucial issues and improving the learner experience. Finally, based on this work, we discuss a definition of learner experience for the emerging field of learner experience design and research. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Learning
Online Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emergent Themes from Study of a Highly Flexible Hybrid Learning Program Culturally- and Linguistically-Responsive Online Teacher Learning Professional Development "I Sing the Body Electric": Embodied Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework Measuring Faculty Engagement in Online Formative or Whole-Person Education “But They’re Grad Students, They Should Know This”: Preliminary Findings from a Writing Center’s Hybrid Approach to Supporting Postgraduates in Qatar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1