用自动定理证明器形式化验证超越定点和浮点算法

IF 1.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Formal Aspects of Computing Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543670
Samuel Coward, Lawrence Paulson, Theo Drane, Emiliano Morini
{"title":"用自动定理证明器形式化验证超越定点和浮点算法","authors":"Samuel Coward, Lawrence Paulson, Theo Drane, Emiliano Morini","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present a method for formal verification of transcendental hardware and software algorithms that scales to higher precision without suffering an exponential growth in runtimes. A class of implementations using piecewise polynomial approximation to compute the result is verified using MetiTarski, an automated theorem prover, which verifies a range of inputs for each call. The method was applied to commercial implementations from Cadence Design Systems with significant runtime gains over exhaustive testing methods and was successful in proving that the expected accuracy of one implementation was overly optimistic. Reproducing the verification of a sine implementation in software, previously done using an alternative theorem-proving technique, demonstrates that the MetiTarski approach is a viable competitor. Verification of a 52-bit implementation of the square root function highlights the method’s high-precision capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50432,"journal":{"name":"Formal Aspects of Computing","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Verification of Transcendental Fixed- and Floating-point Algorithms using an Automatic Theorem Prover\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Coward, Lawrence Paulson, Theo Drane, Emiliano Morini\",\"doi\":\"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We present a method for formal verification of transcendental hardware and software algorithms that scales to higher precision without suffering an exponential growth in runtimes. A class of implementations using piecewise polynomial approximation to compute the result is verified using MetiTarski, an automated theorem prover, which verifies a range of inputs for each call. The method was applied to commercial implementations from Cadence Design Systems with significant runtime gains over exhaustive testing methods and was successful in proving that the expected accuracy of one implementation was overly optimistic. Reproducing the verification of a sine implementation in software, previously done using an alternative theorem-proving technique, demonstrates that the MetiTarski approach is a viable competitor. Verification of a 52-bit implementation of the square root function highlights the method’s high-precision capabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formal Aspects of Computing\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formal Aspects of Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal Aspects of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一种超越硬件和软件算法的形式化验证方法,该方法可扩展到更高的精度,而不会在运行时遭受指数增长。使用分段多项式近似来计算结果的一类实现使用MetiTarski进行验证,MetiTarski是一个自动定理证明器,它验证每个调用的输入范围。该方法被应用于Cadence Design Systems的商业实现,与详尽的测试方法相比,它在运行时获得了显著的收益,并且成功地证明了一个实现的预期准确性过于乐观。在软件中再现正弦实现的验证(以前使用替代定理证明技术完成)表明,MetiTarski方法是一个可行的竞争对手。对52位平方根函数实现的验证突出了该方法的高精度能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formal Verification of Transcendental Fixed- and Floating-point Algorithms using an Automatic Theorem Prover

We present a method for formal verification of transcendental hardware and software algorithms that scales to higher precision without suffering an exponential growth in runtimes. A class of implementations using piecewise polynomial approximation to compute the result is verified using MetiTarski, an automated theorem prover, which verifies a range of inputs for each call. The method was applied to commercial implementations from Cadence Design Systems with significant runtime gains over exhaustive testing methods and was successful in proving that the expected accuracy of one implementation was overly optimistic. Reproducing the verification of a sine implementation in software, previously done using an alternative theorem-proving technique, demonstrates that the MetiTarski approach is a viable competitor. Verification of a 52-bit implementation of the square root function highlights the method’s high-precision capabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Formal Aspects of Computing
Formal Aspects of Computing 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to publish contributions at the junction of theory and practice. The objective is to disseminate applicable research. Thus new theoretical contributions are welcome where they are motivated by potential application; applications of existing formalisms are of interest if they show something novel about the approach or application. In particular, the scope of Formal Aspects of Computing includes: well-founded notations for the description of systems; verifiable design methods; elucidation of fundamental computational concepts; approaches to fault-tolerant design; theorem-proving support; state-exploration tools; formal underpinning of widely used notations and methods; formal approaches to requirements analysis.
期刊最新文献
A Calculus for the Specification, Design, and Verification of Distributed Concurrent Systems Trace Semantics for C++11 Memory Model SecCT: Secure and scalable count query models on encrypted genomic data On Formal Methods Thinking in Computer Science Education FuSeBMC v4: Improving code coverage with smart seeds via BMC, fuzzing and static analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1