《俄国和英国的家庭小说,1800-1880》作者:安娜·a·伯曼(书评)

IF 0.7 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES DICKENS QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1353/dqt.2023.a913290
Renata Goroshkova
{"title":"《俄国和英国的家庭小说,1800-1880》作者:安娜·a·伯曼(书评)","authors":"Renata Goroshkova","doi":"10.1353/dqt.2023.a913290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880</em> by Anna A. Berman <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Renata Goroshkova (bio) </li> </ul> Anna A. Berman. <em>The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880</em>. Oxford UP, 2023. Pp. x + 272. $101.99. ISBN 978-0-19-286662-2 (hb). <p>Berman explains the relevance and importance of this book by the fact that she is fighting against the \"aesthetic racism\" that, in the words of Elaine Freedgood, \"has placed the British and French nineteenth-century novel at the masterful, still center of […] novel history\" (qtd. 5), and confronting the unfairness of forgetting dominant literary figures. For, \"one could hardly claim that Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Turgenev were <em>not</em> important contributors to the nineteenth-century novel tradition\" (5). The book was written, obviously, before the recent events began, but being released in the middle of speculations about the cancelling of Russian culture, and on the background of rumors about the exclusion of Dostoevsky's novels from the curricula of American Universities, it becomes a heartening ray of sanity, revealing a unique perspective on how literature of both the British and the Russian empires digested and problematized social questions of their time, developing defensive mechanisms against toxic ideology and deleterious beliefs.</p> <p>Berman studies novels in the context of family history through the lens of different aspects of life, from laws related to family matters to the changing role of women in society, making a parallel between the family and the State: \"Viewed in this context, the depictions of family in the novels take on greater social and political weight. The pervasiveness of the theme of tyrannical fathers and patriarchal oppression could be understood as the closest authors could come to critiquing the autocracy\" (13–14). The society that is formed under a certain type of state government directly affects the ways in which families are created in this society, which, according to Berman, is overtly manifested in the structure of novels: \"family structure is indeed a crucial determinant of the plotlines each nation embraced\" (88). By understanding another and seeing the world from their perspective, we can learn more about ourselves, therefore, and the comparative aspect can be considered the main advantage of the book. Berman masterfully and convincingly compares the English and the Russian family structure that forms the novel space – \"the English had a linear model of family that focused on genealogy, origins, and descent, while the Russians were much more interested in <em>all</em> the family in the here and now\" (2) – and draws far-reaching conclusions: \"The English focus on futurity versus the Russian emphasis on the present can be explained by a more fundamental distinction between the two societies: stability, or lack thereof\" (36).</p> <p>This remarkable study of the family novel is multifaceted and provides the deepest insight into various cultural and historical matters related to the family in both countries. Berman explains how and why the content of <strong>[End Page 497]</strong> the concept \"family\" was changing over time in Russia and England, what was the reason for the increasing importance of surnames, and why family portraiture, pedigrees and heirlooms became wildly fashionable in Victorian England. Her knowledge of Russian history is exceptionally profound, as she demonstrates while, for example, elaborating on the role of the instability of the political order in forming \"the absentee-owner mentality\" (38, quoting John Randolph), or explaining why the Russians were against the Law of Single Inheritance and \"the nobles were not trying to increase their capital to enhance the prestige of their heirs\" (35), finding out what was a more pliable strategy for family survival in Russia. She brilliantly analyses the formation of the Russian national character and how writers understood the essence of Russianness, paying specific attention to the importance of brotherly love (quoting Dostoevsky – \"To become a real Russian … means just […] to become a brother to all people, a <em>panhuman</em>, if you like\" [79]), the idea that would later be vulgarized and utilized for propaganda purposes – in the same fashion as happened with the ideas of Nietzsche and Wagner in Nazi Germany.</p> <p>As a specialist in Russian Literature, Berman focuses on the interconnectedness of the Russian mentality with the Christian (Orthodox) worldview, and I find...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41747,"journal":{"name":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","volume":"76 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880 by Anna A. Berman (review)\",\"authors\":\"Renata Goroshkova\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dqt.2023.a913290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880</em> by Anna A. Berman <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Renata Goroshkova (bio) </li> </ul> Anna A. Berman. <em>The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880</em>. Oxford UP, 2023. Pp. x + 272. $101.99. ISBN 978-0-19-286662-2 (hb). <p>Berman explains the relevance and importance of this book by the fact that she is fighting against the \\\"aesthetic racism\\\" that, in the words of Elaine Freedgood, \\\"has placed the British and French nineteenth-century novel at the masterful, still center of […] novel history\\\" (qtd. 5), and confronting the unfairness of forgetting dominant literary figures. For, \\\"one could hardly claim that Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Turgenev were <em>not</em> important contributors to the nineteenth-century novel tradition\\\" (5). The book was written, obviously, before the recent events began, but being released in the middle of speculations about the cancelling of Russian culture, and on the background of rumors about the exclusion of Dostoevsky's novels from the curricula of American Universities, it becomes a heartening ray of sanity, revealing a unique perspective on how literature of both the British and the Russian empires digested and problematized social questions of their time, developing defensive mechanisms against toxic ideology and deleterious beliefs.</p> <p>Berman studies novels in the context of family history through the lens of different aspects of life, from laws related to family matters to the changing role of women in society, making a parallel between the family and the State: \\\"Viewed in this context, the depictions of family in the novels take on greater social and political weight. The pervasiveness of the theme of tyrannical fathers and patriarchal oppression could be understood as the closest authors could come to critiquing the autocracy\\\" (13–14). The society that is formed under a certain type of state government directly affects the ways in which families are created in this society, which, according to Berman, is overtly manifested in the structure of novels: \\\"family structure is indeed a crucial determinant of the plotlines each nation embraced\\\" (88). By understanding another and seeing the world from their perspective, we can learn more about ourselves, therefore, and the comparative aspect can be considered the main advantage of the book. Berman masterfully and convincingly compares the English and the Russian family structure that forms the novel space – \\\"the English had a linear model of family that focused on genealogy, origins, and descent, while the Russians were much more interested in <em>all</em> the family in the here and now\\\" (2) – and draws far-reaching conclusions: \\\"The English focus on futurity versus the Russian emphasis on the present can be explained by a more fundamental distinction between the two societies: stability, or lack thereof\\\" (36).</p> <p>This remarkable study of the family novel is multifaceted and provides the deepest insight into various cultural and historical matters related to the family in both countries. Berman explains how and why the content of <strong>[End Page 497]</strong> the concept \\\"family\\\" was changing over time in Russia and England, what was the reason for the increasing importance of surnames, and why family portraiture, pedigrees and heirlooms became wildly fashionable in Victorian England. Her knowledge of Russian history is exceptionally profound, as she demonstrates while, for example, elaborating on the role of the instability of the political order in forming \\\"the absentee-owner mentality\\\" (38, quoting John Randolph), or explaining why the Russians were against the Law of Single Inheritance and \\\"the nobles were not trying to increase their capital to enhance the prestige of their heirs\\\" (35), finding out what was a more pliable strategy for family survival in Russia. She brilliantly analyses the formation of the Russian national character and how writers understood the essence of Russianness, paying specific attention to the importance of brotherly love (quoting Dostoevsky – \\\"To become a real Russian … means just […] to become a brother to all people, a <em>panhuman</em>, if you like\\\" [79]), the idea that would later be vulgarized and utilized for propaganda purposes – in the same fashion as happened with the ideas of Nietzsche and Wagner in Nazi Germany.</p> <p>As a specialist in Russian Literature, Berman focuses on the interconnectedness of the Russian mentality with the Christian (Orthodox) worldview, and I find...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DICKENS QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"76 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DICKENS QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2023.a913290\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2023.a913290","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为摘要,这里有一个简短的内容摘录:书评:俄罗斯和英国的家庭小说,1800-1880,作者:安娜·a·伯曼。俄国和英国的家庭小说,1800-1880。牛津大学,2023年。第x + 272页。101.99美元。ISBN 978-0-19-286662-2 (hb)。伯曼解释了这本书的相关性和重要性,因为她正在与“审美种族主义”作斗争,用伊莱恩·弗里古德(Elaine Freedgood)的话来说,“审美种族主义已经把英国和法国19世纪的小说置于[…]小说史的卓越中心”。5)面对忘记主要文学人物的不公平。因为,“很难断言陀思妥耶夫斯基、托尔斯泰和屠格涅夫对19世纪小说传统没有重要贡献”(5)。显然,这本书是在最近的事件开始之前写的,但在关于取消俄罗斯文化的猜测中出版,并且在有关陀思妥耶夫斯基的小说被排除在美国大学课程之外的谣言的背景下,它成为了一种令人振奋的理智之光。以独特的视角揭示了英国和俄罗斯帝国的文学是如何消化和解决他们那个时代的社会问题的,如何发展出对抗有毒意识形态和有害信仰的防御机制的。伯曼通过生活的不同方面来研究家族史背景下的小说,从与家庭事务有关的法律到妇女在社会中角色的变化,将家庭与国家相提并论:“在这种背景下,小说中对家庭的描绘具有更大的社会和政治分量。暴虐父亲和父权压迫的主题无处不在,可以被理解为最接近于批评专制的作家”(13-14)。在某种类型的国家政府下形成的社会直接影响着这个社会中家庭的形成方式,根据伯曼的观点,这一点在小说的结构中得到了明显的体现:“家庭结构确实是每个国家所接受的情节的关键决定因素”(88)。通过理解别人,从别人的角度看世界,我们可以更多地了解自己,因此,比较的方面可以被认为是这本书的主要优点。伯曼巧妙而令人信服地比较了形成小说空间的英国人和俄罗斯人的家庭结构——“英国人有一个线性的家庭模型,关注家谱、起源和血统,而俄罗斯人对此时此刻的所有家庭更感兴趣”——并得出了深远的结论:“英国人关注未来,而俄罗斯人强调现在,这可以用两个社会之间更根本的区别来解释:稳定或缺乏稳定”(36)。这本对家庭小说的杰出研究是多方面的,对两国与家庭有关的各种文化和历史问题提供了最深刻的见解。伯曼解释了在俄罗斯和英国,“家庭”这个概念的内容是如何以及为什么随着时间的推移而改变的,姓氏越来越重要的原因是什么,以及为什么家族肖像、家谱和传家宝在维多利亚时代的英国变得非常流行。她对俄罗斯历史的了解非常深刻,例如,她阐述了政治秩序的不稳定在形成“缺席所有者心态”中的作用(38,引用约翰·伦道夫的话),或者解释了为什么俄罗斯人反对单一继承法和“贵族们不试图增加他们的资本来提高他们继承人的声望”(35),找出了在俄罗斯家庭生存的更灵活的策略。她出色地分析了俄罗斯民族性格的形成以及作家则已理解的本质,具体关注兄弟之爱的重要性(引用陀思妥耶夫斯基-”成为一个真正的俄罗斯……意味着只是[…]成为所有人的兄弟,全人类,如果你喜欢“[79]),即后来被莎士比亚和用于宣传目的,以相同的方式发生在纳粹德国的尼采和瓦格纳的想法。作为俄罗斯文学的专家,伯曼关注的是俄罗斯人的心态与基督教(东正教)世界观的相互联系,我发现……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880 by Anna A. Berman (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880 by Anna A. Berman
  • Renata Goroshkova (bio)
Anna A. Berman. The Family Novel in Russia and England, 1800–1880. Oxford UP, 2023. Pp. x + 272. $101.99. ISBN 978-0-19-286662-2 (hb).

Berman explains the relevance and importance of this book by the fact that she is fighting against the "aesthetic racism" that, in the words of Elaine Freedgood, "has placed the British and French nineteenth-century novel at the masterful, still center of […] novel history" (qtd. 5), and confronting the unfairness of forgetting dominant literary figures. For, "one could hardly claim that Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Turgenev were not important contributors to the nineteenth-century novel tradition" (5). The book was written, obviously, before the recent events began, but being released in the middle of speculations about the cancelling of Russian culture, and on the background of rumors about the exclusion of Dostoevsky's novels from the curricula of American Universities, it becomes a heartening ray of sanity, revealing a unique perspective on how literature of both the British and the Russian empires digested and problematized social questions of their time, developing defensive mechanisms against toxic ideology and deleterious beliefs.

Berman studies novels in the context of family history through the lens of different aspects of life, from laws related to family matters to the changing role of women in society, making a parallel between the family and the State: "Viewed in this context, the depictions of family in the novels take on greater social and political weight. The pervasiveness of the theme of tyrannical fathers and patriarchal oppression could be understood as the closest authors could come to critiquing the autocracy" (13–14). The society that is formed under a certain type of state government directly affects the ways in which families are created in this society, which, according to Berman, is overtly manifested in the structure of novels: "family structure is indeed a crucial determinant of the plotlines each nation embraced" (88). By understanding another and seeing the world from their perspective, we can learn more about ourselves, therefore, and the comparative aspect can be considered the main advantage of the book. Berman masterfully and convincingly compares the English and the Russian family structure that forms the novel space – "the English had a linear model of family that focused on genealogy, origins, and descent, while the Russians were much more interested in all the family in the here and now" (2) – and draws far-reaching conclusions: "The English focus on futurity versus the Russian emphasis on the present can be explained by a more fundamental distinction between the two societies: stability, or lack thereof" (36).

This remarkable study of the family novel is multifaceted and provides the deepest insight into various cultural and historical matters related to the family in both countries. Berman explains how and why the content of [End Page 497] the concept "family" was changing over time in Russia and England, what was the reason for the increasing importance of surnames, and why family portraiture, pedigrees and heirlooms became wildly fashionable in Victorian England. Her knowledge of Russian history is exceptionally profound, as she demonstrates while, for example, elaborating on the role of the instability of the political order in forming "the absentee-owner mentality" (38, quoting John Randolph), or explaining why the Russians were against the Law of Single Inheritance and "the nobles were not trying to increase their capital to enhance the prestige of their heirs" (35), finding out what was a more pliable strategy for family survival in Russia. She brilliantly analyses the formation of the Russian national character and how writers understood the essence of Russianness, paying specific attention to the importance of brotherly love (quoting Dostoevsky – "To become a real Russian … means just […] to become a brother to all people, a panhuman, if you like" [79]), the idea that would later be vulgarized and utilized for propaganda purposes – in the same fashion as happened with the ideas of Nietzsche and Wagner in Nazi Germany.

As a specialist in Russian Literature, Berman focuses on the interconnectedness of the Russian mentality with the Christian (Orthodox) worldview, and I find...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DICKENS QUARTERLY
DICKENS QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Dickens's Mudfog Charles Dickens and Georgina Hogarth: A Curious and Enduring Relationship by Christine Skelton (review) Writing to Control the Narrative: Charles Dickens, PTSD, and the Staplehurst Rail Crash The Year that Shaped the Victorian Age: Lives, Loves and Letters of 1845 by Michael Wheeler (review) The Dickens Checklist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1