考察学生和教师对差异化实践、学生参与和教师素质的看法

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Advanced Academics Pub Date : 2020-06-13 DOI:10.1177/1932202x20931457
Manoj Chandra Handa
{"title":"考察学生和教师对差异化实践、学生参与和教师素质的看法","authors":"Manoj Chandra Handa","doi":"10.1177/1932202x20931457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare students’ and teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and the qualities of an effective teacher by fostering student voice. Participants included 802 students and 867 teachers from Northern Sydney government schools in Australia. The researcher used a convergent parallel mixed methods design, including online questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Years 5 to 12 gifted students (n = 38) from four schools acted as co-researchers at the methodological level. The student co-researchers co-designed and disseminated the student survey, and interviewed their own teachers. Significant differences were found between the students’ and the teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and the qualities of an effective teacher. The study’s findings highlight the need for a shared understanding of perspectives by both teachers and students to foster schoolwide optimal learning and teaching processes.","PeriodicalId":46535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Academics","volume":"281 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Differentiated Practices, Student Engagement, and Teacher Qualities\",\"authors\":\"Manoj Chandra Handa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1932202x20931457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to compare students’ and teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and the qualities of an effective teacher by fostering student voice. Participants included 802 students and 867 teachers from Northern Sydney government schools in Australia. The researcher used a convergent parallel mixed methods design, including online questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Years 5 to 12 gifted students (n = 38) from four schools acted as co-researchers at the methodological level. The student co-researchers co-designed and disseminated the student survey, and interviewed their own teachers. Significant differences were found between the students’ and the teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and the qualities of an effective teacher. The study’s findings highlight the need for a shared understanding of perspectives by both teachers and students to foster schoolwide optimal learning and teaching processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Academics\",\"volume\":\"281 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Academics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x20931457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Academics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x20931457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是通过培养学生的声音来比较学生和教师对差异化实践、学生参与和有效教师素质的看法。参与者包括来自澳大利亚北悉尼公立学校的802名学生和867名教师。研究者采用了收敛平行混合方法设计,包括在线问卷调查和面对面访谈。来自四所学校的5至12年级的天才学生(n = 38)在方法层面上担任共同研究人员。学生共同研究人员共同设计和传播学生调查,并采访了他们自己的老师。学生和教师对差异化实践、学生参与和有效教师素质的看法存在显著差异。该研究的结果强调了教师和学生对观点的共同理解的必要性,以促进全校最佳的学习和教学过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Differentiated Practices, Student Engagement, and Teacher Qualities
The purpose of this study was to compare students’ and teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and the qualities of an effective teacher by fostering student voice. Participants included 802 students and 867 teachers from Northern Sydney government schools in Australia. The researcher used a convergent parallel mixed methods design, including online questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Years 5 to 12 gifted students (n = 38) from four schools acted as co-researchers at the methodological level. The student co-researchers co-designed and disseminated the student survey, and interviewed their own teachers. Significant differences were found between the students’ and the teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and the qualities of an effective teacher. The study’s findings highlight the need for a shared understanding of perspectives by both teachers and students to foster schoolwide optimal learning and teaching processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Academics
Journal of Advanced Academics EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Word: Relationships Course Correction: Navigating Equity in Ninth-Grade Advanced Placement Navigating AP Research: Unveiling Applied Technology High School Students’ Perspectives, Gains, and Challenges Enhancing the Professional Skills of Future Biologists Through Laboratory Training Call for Proposals: Special Issue on AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1