将家庭农民的感知与气象记录和国家气候变化预测相结合,以增强特定地点的适应知识

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s11027-023-10093-2
Andrea Soledad Enriquez, Manuela Fernández, María Valeria Aramayo, Juan De Pascuale, Paula Ocariz, Pablo Tittonell
{"title":"将家庭农民的感知与气象记录和国家气候变化预测相结合,以增强特定地点的适应知识","authors":"Andrea Soledad Enriquez, Manuela Fernández, María Valeria Aramayo, Juan De Pascuale, Paula Ocariz, Pablo Tittonell","doi":"10.1007/s11027-023-10093-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adaptation strategies to climate change (CC) that do not consider local perspectives tend to fail at specific sites. Searching for complementary actions, we aimed to assess how farmers’ perceptions about climatic hazards match past and future climate data. An original common coding was developed to combine qualitative and quantitative data using climate trend indicators. In our case study, we compared climate perceptions of family farmers from seven localities of northern Patagonia, Argentina, collected from seven participatory risk assessment workshops, with meteorological records from six local weather stations (1999–2020) and national projected CC scenarios (simulations to 2039). In the context of a semiarid region, people’s greatest concern was found to be focused on the scarcity of water resources. Despite this focus, results showed that temperature (<i>T</i>) had greater predictability from farmers than precipitation (<i>P</i>): perceptions were better associated with past and future <i>T</i> variable trends (<i>T</i> mean, <i>T</i> min, and <i>T</i> max), than with <i>P</i> ones (average rainfall and number of days with rainfall events &gt; 10 mm). We discussed social and technical causes of matches or mismatches among the views. The information resulting from the comparison of perceived climatic hazards and climate data can be used to improve climate communication with farmers, to collectively assess, design, and prioritize site-specific adaptation measures and future actions. The detailed description of our methodology would allow others to take advantage of local and technical knowledge to overcome climate change challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":54387,"journal":{"name":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating family farmers’ perceptions with meteorological records and national climate change projections to enhance site-specific adaptation knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Soledad Enriquez, Manuela Fernández, María Valeria Aramayo, Juan De Pascuale, Paula Ocariz, Pablo Tittonell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11027-023-10093-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Adaptation strategies to climate change (CC) that do not consider local perspectives tend to fail at specific sites. Searching for complementary actions, we aimed to assess how farmers’ perceptions about climatic hazards match past and future climate data. An original common coding was developed to combine qualitative and quantitative data using climate trend indicators. In our case study, we compared climate perceptions of family farmers from seven localities of northern Patagonia, Argentina, collected from seven participatory risk assessment workshops, with meteorological records from six local weather stations (1999–2020) and national projected CC scenarios (simulations to 2039). In the context of a semiarid region, people’s greatest concern was found to be focused on the scarcity of water resources. Despite this focus, results showed that temperature (<i>T</i>) had greater predictability from farmers than precipitation (<i>P</i>): perceptions were better associated with past and future <i>T</i> variable trends (<i>T</i> mean, <i>T</i> min, and <i>T</i> max), than with <i>P</i> ones (average rainfall and number of days with rainfall events &gt; 10 mm). We discussed social and technical causes of matches or mismatches among the views. The information resulting from the comparison of perceived climatic hazards and climate data can be used to improve climate communication with farmers, to collectively assess, design, and prioritize site-specific adaptation measures and future actions. The detailed description of our methodology would allow others to take advantage of local and technical knowledge to overcome climate change challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10093-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10093-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不考虑当地视角的气候变化适应战略往往在特定地点失败。为了寻找补充行动,我们旨在评估农民对气候灾害的看法如何与过去和未来的气候数据相匹配。开发了一种原始的通用编码,利用气候趋势指标将定性和定量数据结合起来。在我们的案例研究中,我们将来自阿根廷巴塔哥尼亚北部7个地区的家庭农民的气候感知与6个当地气象站的气象记录(1999-2020年)和国家预测的CC情景(模拟到2039年)进行了比较。在半干旱地区,人们最关心的是水资源的缺乏。尽管如此,结果表明,农民对温度(T)的可预测性比降水(P)更强:感知与过去和未来的T变量趋势(T均值、T最小值和T最大值)的关系更好,而与P变量趋势(平均降雨量和降雨天数)的关系更大。我们讨论了视图之间匹配或不匹配的社会和技术原因。将感知到的气候灾害与气候数据进行比较所得到的信息可用于改善与农民的气候沟通,集体评估、设计和优先考虑特定地点的适应措施和未来行动。对我们方法的详细描述将使其他人能够利用当地的技术知识来克服气候变化的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating family farmers’ perceptions with meteorological records and national climate change projections to enhance site-specific adaptation knowledge

Adaptation strategies to climate change (CC) that do not consider local perspectives tend to fail at specific sites. Searching for complementary actions, we aimed to assess how farmers’ perceptions about climatic hazards match past and future climate data. An original common coding was developed to combine qualitative and quantitative data using climate trend indicators. In our case study, we compared climate perceptions of family farmers from seven localities of northern Patagonia, Argentina, collected from seven participatory risk assessment workshops, with meteorological records from six local weather stations (1999–2020) and national projected CC scenarios (simulations to 2039). In the context of a semiarid region, people’s greatest concern was found to be focused on the scarcity of water resources. Despite this focus, results showed that temperature (T) had greater predictability from farmers than precipitation (P): perceptions were better associated with past and future T variable trends (T mean, T min, and T max), than with P ones (average rainfall and number of days with rainfall events > 10 mm). We discussed social and technical causes of matches or mismatches among the views. The information resulting from the comparison of perceived climatic hazards and climate data can be used to improve climate communication with farmers, to collectively assess, design, and prioritize site-specific adaptation measures and future actions. The detailed description of our methodology would allow others to take advantage of local and technical knowledge to overcome climate change challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth''s biosphere is being transformed by various anthropogenic activities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change addresses a wide range of environment, economic and energy topics and timely issues including global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, acid deposition, eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, species extinction and loss of biological diversity, deforestation and forest degradation, desertification, soil resource degradation, land-use change, sea level rise, destruction of coastal zones, depletion of fresh water and marine fisheries, loss of wetlands and riparian zones and hazardous waste management. Response options to mitigate these threats or to adapt to changing environs are needed to ensure a sustainable biosphere for all forms of life. To that end, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change provides a forum to encourage the conceptualization, critical examination and debate regarding response options. The aim of this journal is to provide a forum to review, analyze and stimulate the development, testing and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies at regional, national and global scales. One of the primary goals of this journal is to contribute to real-time policy analysis and development as national and international policies and agreements are discussed and promulgated.
期刊最新文献
Trends in climate adaptation solutions for mountain regions Social networks can mitigate climate change-related food insecurity risks in dryland farming systems in Ghana Biochar-enhanced soilless farming: a sustainable solution for modern agriculture Exploiting time zone differences to harmonize electricity supplies: case study of the Central Asian Region Russia on the pathways to carbon neutrality: forks on roadmaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1